Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:15:29.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fathers and Sons: Politics and Myth in Recent Zambian Drama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Abstract

The conflict of generations is a theme familiar enough in western drama – but less expected in an African context, with its strong traditions of ‘respectful, submissive behaviour towards the old in general, and towards one's parents in particular’. Yet a theme of aggression between fathers and sons has, argues Stewart Crehan, been discernible in a significant proportion of the plays staged in the last three festivals of the Zambian National Theatre Arts Association. He analyzes some of these plays, and examines the implications of the theme in the various social circumstances of contemporary Zambian society, besides discussing the ‘mythical dimension’ which is also involved. Stewart Crehan is currently Senior Lecturer in the Department of Literature and Languages at the University of Zambia, and has been active in Zambian theatre as a playwright, actor, director, and adjudicator. He is author of a critical study and selected edition of the work of William Blake, and has published various articles on literature from the eighteenth to twentieth centuries, and on African drama and literature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banham, Martin, African Theatre Today (Pitman, 1976).Google Scholar
Chifunyise, Stephen, ‘Triumph of a New People's Theatre’, Sunday Times of Zambia, 4 01 1981.Google Scholar
Foner, Nancy, Ages in Conflict: a Cross-Cultural Perspective on Inequality Between Old and Young (Columbia University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo, in The Pelican Freud Library, Vol. 13 (Penguin Books, 1985).Google Scholar
de Graft, J. C., ‘Roots in African Drama and Theatre’, African Literature Today, 8 (Heinemann, 1976), p. 125.Google Scholar
Kalu, Wilhemina, ‘The Impact of Urbanization on the Life Patterns of the Ga Adolescent’, in Fuchs, Estelle, ed., Youth in a Changing World: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Adolescence (Mouton, 1976), p. 137–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalumba, Katete, ‘Working with the Rural Poor in Zambia’ (Dept of Social Development Studies, University of Zambia, 1982).Google Scholar
Kasoma, Kabwe, ‘Is There Such a Thing as African Theatre?’, paper written for the First International Colloquium/Workshop on the Social Role of Theatre in Africa (Lagos, 1978)Google Scholar
Kerr, David, ‘Didactic Theatre in Africa’ (Dept of Literature and Languages, University of Zambia, 1980)Google Scholar
Mbilinyi, Marjorie, ‘Secondary Education’, in Educalion for Liberation and Development: the Tanzanian Experience, ed. Hinzen, H. and Hundsdorfer, V. H. (Unesco, 1979), p. 103–13.Google Scholar
Mudenda, Gilbert, ‘Class Formation and Class Struggle in Contemporary Zambia’, in Magubane, Bernard and Ntalaja, Nzongola, ed., Proletarianization and Class Struggle in Africa (Synthesis Publications, San Francisco, 1983), p. 95118.Google Scholar
Mwansa, Dickson, ‘Zambian Political Theatre’, Index on Censorship, II, 2 (1982), p. 33–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwansa, Dickson, ‘Theatre as a Tool for Communication’, IFDA Dossier, 42 (1984), p. 2432.Google Scholar
Reed, John, ‘Zambian Fiction’, in Killam, G. D., ed., The Writing of East and Central Africa (Heinemann, 1984), p. 8299.Google Scholar
Scudder, Thayer, and Colson, Elizabeth, Secondary Education and the Formation of an Elite: the Impact of Educalion on Gwembe District, Zambia (Academic Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Turner, Victor, Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors (Cornell University Press. 1974).Google Scholar
Turner, Victor, ‘Social Dramas and Stories about Them’, in On Narrative, ed. Mitchell, W. J. T. (University of Chicago Press, 1981), p. 137–64.Google Scholar