Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:46:04.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Materialism’, Dialectics, and Editing Shakespeare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Alan Posener
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past few years we have encouraged the simmering in these pages of a continuing debate about the relationship between the bibliographical and scholarly problems of editing Elizabethan texts, changing perceptions of ‘authority’, and the theatrical and political conceptions, old and new, which may affect all these. Brian Parker, in NTQ24 (1990), and Stanley Wells, in NTQ26 (1991), were early contributors, and in NTQ34 (1992) Graham Holderness and Bryan Loughrey took up the argument, specifically questioning the editorial principles of the recent Oxford Shakespeare. Here, Alan Posener takes up the debate, criticizing the methodology and terminology adopted by Holderness and Loughrey, and some of the conclusions to which these led. Alan Posener is a British expatriate living in Berlin who – after stints in radical left-wing politics and teaching – became a writer, specializing in popular biography. He is currently rewriting one of the standard German biographies of William Shakespeare.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 10 , Issue 39 , August 1994 , pp. 263 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. Julius Caesar, Arden edition, p. 166, reprinted from Anglia, XXII (1809), P. 458.Google Scholar

2. See under ‘Komödie” in Der Grosse Duden, Bd. 7: Etymologie (Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut Mannheim, 1963).Google Scholar

3. I looked the word up in my grandmother's crossword-puzzle dictionary, the Imperial Reference Dictionary (London: Newnes, 1954).Google Scholar Just to make sure, I checked in Webster's Encyclopaedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, 1989 edition. And ‘shovel’ as equalling ‘shovelful’ is in both.