Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T02:19:09.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Albert Filozov and the Method of Physical Actions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Abstract

As a complementary piece to her preceding article on the formative significance of The Seagull to Stanislavsky's early thinking, Bella Merlin here looks at the play in the context of Stanislavsky's later work, when he was developing the Method of Physical Actions – an approach to a text which placed improvisation and the physical exploration of a scene at the centre of the actor's rehearsal process. This was in some ways a contravention of what was becoming codified in the West (through limited material being available in translation) as the psychological basis of the system. In 1995, Bella Merlin undertook a ten-month course of actor-training at the State Institute of Cinematography in Moscow, where she worked with acting ‘master’, Albert Filozov, who had trained with Mikhail Kedrov, one of the first developers of Stanislavsky's work following his death in 1938. Here, she examines the roots of Filozov's training and the nature of the Method of Physical Actions in theory and in practice. Bella Merlin trained as an actress in Britain and Russia, and has worked extensively in theatre and television. She is currently a lecturer in Drama and Theatre Arts at Birmingham University, where her area of research is acting processes and the psycho-physical nature of performance. This article is based on a paper delivered at the ‘Flight of the Seagull’ conference at the Alexandrinsky Theatre, St Petersburg, in November 1996, to celebrate the one-hundredth anniversary of the premiere of The Seagull.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. Stanislavsky, K. S., Creating a Role, trans. Hapgood, Elizabeth Reynolds (London: Methuen, 1988)Google Scholar.

2. Interview with Albert Filozov at VGIK, 19 July 1995.

3. ‘Konstantin Sergeyevich used to say that when we say “physical actions”, we are fooling the actor. They are psycho-physical actions, but we call them physical in order to avoid any unnecessary philosophizing. As for physical actions, they are concrete and easily under-stood. Precision of action – concreteness in its fulfilment in a given performance – this is the foundation of our art. If I know the exact action and its logic, then it becomes for me a score; how I carry out the action, according to the score, here, before this audience – that is creativity’. Kedrov, cited in Toporkov, V. O., Stanislavksy in Rehearsal: the Final Years, trans. Edwards, Christine (New York: Theatre Arts, 1979), p. 211Google Scholar.

4. Interview with Filozov, 19 July 1995.

5. Ibid.

6. Ibid.

7. Strasberg, Lee, cited in Strasberg at the Actors Studio: Tape-Recorded Sessions, ed. by Hethmon, Robert H. (New York: Theatre Communications Group, 1991), p. 111Google Scholar.

8. Ibid.

9. Ibid., p. 112.

10. Interview with Filozov, 19 July 1994. (The emphasis is mine.)

11. Ibid.

12. Ibid.

13. Stanislavsky, cited in Gorchakov, N. M., Stanislavsky Directs, trans. Goldina, Miriam (New York: Limelight, 1991)Google Scholar.

14. Chekhov, Anton, The Seagull, trans. Frayn, Michael (London: Methuen, 1990), p. 19Google Scholar.

15. Ibid., p. 7.

16. Stanislavsky, Creating a Role, p. 160.