Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T23:19:39.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Development of Textual Criticism since B. H. Streeter1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Bell, H. I. and Skeat, T. C. (ed.), Fragments of an Unknown Gospel and other Early Christian Papyri (London, 1935).Google Scholar

3 v. Dobschütz IV

(1933) Aland VII (1969)

pap. 48 81 +33

majusc. 208 267 +59

minusc. 2370 2764 +394

lect. 1609 2143 +534

Total 4235 5255 +1020

4 Manilii, M.Astronomica, recensuit Housman, A. E.. Editio minor (Cambridge, 1932). p. ix.Google Scholar

5 Lucani, M. AnnaeiBelli Civilis, Libri Decem, ed. Housman, A. E. (Oxford, 1926), pp. VI f.Google Scholar

1 Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J. A., The New Testament in the Original Greek (Cambridge, 1881), 2, 3959, especially pp. 53–7.Google Scholar

2 Ibid. pp. 90–107.

3 Cf. also Metzger, B. M., The Text of the New Testament (second edition Oxford, 1968), pp. 221–3.Google Scholar

4 Westcott, and Hort, , op. cit. p. 99.Google Scholar

5 La Tradition manuscrite du Lai de l'ombre, réflexions sur l'art d'éditor les anciens textes’, Romania 54 (1928), 161–96, 321–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Ibid. p. 338.

7 Ibid. p. 356.

1 Initiation à la Critique Textuelle Néotestamentaire (Paris, 1934), p. 60.Google Scholar

2 Genealogical method: its achievements and limitations’, J.B.L. 66 (1947), 109–33.Google Scholar

3 Ibid. p. 113.

4 Ibid. p. 114.

5 Ibid. p. 109.

1 Colwell, E. C., ‘Method in locating a newly-discovered manuscript within the manuscript tradition of the Greek New Testament’, T. u. U. 73 (1959), 757–77.Google Scholar

2 Ibid. p. 759.

3 Colwell, E. C. with Sparks, I. A., Wisse, F., Reynolds, P. R., ‘The International Greek New Testament Project: a status report’, J.B.L. 87 (1968), 187–97.Google Scholar

4 Rand, E. K., ‘Text of the Vulgate’, H.T.R. 18 (1924), 197264.Google Scholar

5 Ibid. pp. 262 f.

1 Texts and Studies VII, 3 (C.U.P. 1902).Google Scholar

2 H.T.R. XVI (1923), 267–86.Google Scholar

3 Ibid. pp. 285 f.

4 Streeter, B. H., The Four Gospels, a Study of Origins (fourth impression, revised, Macmillan, 1930), pp. 91100.Google Scholar

5 The Caesarean Text of the Gospel of Mark’, H.T.R. 21 (1928), 207404.Google Scholar

6 J.T.S. XXVI, (1925), 278–94; p. 285.Google Scholar

7 Ibid. pp. 378–80.

8 Lake, Silva, ‘Family Π and the Codex Alexandrines’, Studies and Documents 5 (1937).Google Scholar

9 , K. and Lake, S., ‘Family 13 (the Ferrar Group)’, Studies and Documents 11 (1941).Google Scholar

1 Oxford, 1914.

2 Streeter, , op. cit. pp. 129–48.Google Scholar

3 The Western Text in the Gospels and Acts’, Proc. Brit. Acad. 24 (1938), 287–315.Google Scholar

4 Oxford, 1933, reprinted 1970.

5 Ibid. p. viii.

6 Ibid. pp. xlv-lii.

1 Western non-interpolations’, J.B.L. 91 (1972), 369–79.Google Scholar

2 Zuntz, G., The Text of the Epistles, a Disquisition upon the Corpus Paulinum, The Schweich Lectures 1946 (London, 1953).Google Scholar

1 Ibid. p. 11.

2 Ibid. pp. 58–159.

3 Ibid. pp. 142 ff.

4 Ibid. p. 156.

5 Ibid. pp. 158 f.

6 Ibid. p. 214.

7 Ibid. p. 271.

1 Ibid. p. 58.

2 Ibid. p. 59.

3 Ibid. p. 283.

1 Reuss, Eduard, Bibliotheca Novi Testamenti graeci cuius editions ab initio typographiae ad nostram aetatem impressas quotquot reperiri potuerunt (Brunsvigae, 1872).Google Scholar

2 Cf. Metzger, , op. cit. p. 146.Google Scholar

3 Nouum Testamentum Graece secundum textum Westcotto-Hortianum; Euangelium secundum Marcum (Oxonii 1935)Google Scholar; Euangelium secundum Matthaeum (1940).Google Scholar

4 J.T.S. XLIII (1942), 8392.Google Scholar Cf. also the criticisms of Kilpatrick, G. D., ‘The Oxford Greek New Testament’, in the same volume, pp. 30–4.Google Scholar

5 Manson, , op. cit. p. 89.Google Scholar

6 The Four Gospels, pp. 147 f.Google Scholar

7 The Byzantine text in New Testament criticism’, J.T.S. 43 (1942), 2530.Google Scholar

8 Kilpatrick, op. cit.

9 Duplacy, Jean, ‘Une Tâche Importante en Difficulté: l'édition du Nouveau Testament Grec’, N.T.S. 14 (19671968), 457–68.Google Scholar

10 Ibid. p. 461.

1 London, 1958.

2 Three vols. (Leipzig, 18941900).Google Scholar

3 Rome, 1933; ninth edition, 1964.

4 Madrid, 1943; fourth edition, 1959.

5 The Greek New Testament, ed. Aland, K., Black, M., Martini, C. M., Metzger, B. M. and Wikgren, A. (first edition 1966, second edition 1968).Google Scholar

6 Metzger, B. M., A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament: A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament (third edition) (United Bible Societies, 1971).Google Scholar

1 Richard Bentley, Proposals for Printing a new edition of the Greek Testament and St. Hierom's Latin Version, with a full answer to all the remarks of a late pamphleteer, By a Member of Trinity College in Cambridge (1721). Bentley's Works, ed. Dyce, A. (London, 1838), 3, 475538.Google Scholar

2 Bentley's Letter to Archbishop Wake, Dyce, op. cit. III, 478.Google Scholar

3 Housman, A. E., Selected Prose (Cambridge, 1961), p. 132.Google Scholar

1 Zuntz, , The Text of the Epistles, p. 13.Google Scholar