Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T15:47:00.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI. The Poems (2)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Get access

Extract

The four longer poems which constitute the second scroll have received their share of attention. Apart from the standard commentaries, the wedding-hymn for Manlius Torquatus and Junia Aurunculeia has been the subject of an extended commentary by P. Fideli and some pertinent remarks by Gordon Williams; the second wedding-hymn elicited a major article by no less a scholar than E. Fraenkel; Attis and Peleus and Thetis have attracted a host of interpreters.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Surveys in the Classics , Volume 20: Catullus , 1988 , pp. 32 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Fedeli, P.,Carme 61 di Catullo (Fribourg, 1972)Google Scholar; G. Williams (1968), pp. 199-202.

2. In JRS 45 (1955), 1-8.

3. For bibliography see Quinn (1970, 1973) and Ferguson (1985). Note especially Cairns (1972), pp. 62-3; Elder, J.P. in AJPh 68 (1947), 394–403 Google Scholar; Harkins, P.W. in TAPhA 90 (1959), 102-16Google Scholar; Musurillo, H., Symbol and Myth in Ancient Poetry (New York, 1961), pp. 104-6Google Scholar; Rubino, C.A. in Ramus 3 (1974), 152-75CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sandy, G.N. in TAPhA 99 (1968), 389-99Google Scholar and AJPh 92 (1971), 185-95.

4. U. v. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff (1924), ii, 298.

5. R. Jenkyns(1982), p. 149.

6. Klingner, F., Catulls Peleus-Epos (Munich, 1956)Google Scholar.

7. Conveniently J. Ferguson (1985), pp. 193-4 on the basis of earlier writers.

8. J. C Bramble (1970).

9. D. Konstan (1977).

10. Marion L. Daniels (1972).

11. M. C. J. Putnam (1961).

12. Copley, F.P. in TAPhA 80 (1949), 245-53Google Scholar; Giangrande, G. in QUCC 9 (1970), 84–131 Google Scholar; Levin, D.N. in CPh 54 (1967), 109-11Google Scholar; Richardson, L. in AJPh 88 (1967), 423-33Google Scholar.

13. The literature is large. Among much else see Copley, F.O. in CPh (1957), 29–32 Google Scholar; Kinsey, T.E in Latomus 26 (1967), 35–53 Google Scholar; Levine, P. in CSCA 9 (1976), 61–88 Google Scholar; Pennisi, G. in Emerita 27 (1959), 213-38Google Scholar; Prescott, H.W. in TAPhA 71 (1940), 473–500 Google Scholar; K. Quinn (1972), pp. 179-90; Skinner, M.B. in TAPhA 103 (1972), 495–512; C. Witke (1968), pp. 27-51.Google Scholar

14. Curran, L.C. in Arion 6 (1966), 24-7Google Scholar.

15. Einarson, B. in CPh 61 (1966), 187-8Google Scholar; Fordyce (1961), pp. 373-7; Harrison, E. in CR 29 (1915), 198-9Google Scholar; Neudling (1955); Ramage, E.S. in CPh 54 (1959), 44-5Google Scholar; Sturtevant, C.H., The Pronunciations of Greek and Latin (Philadelphia, 2 1940), pp. 155-60Google Scholar.

16. See Khan, H. Akbar in Hommages à Marcel Renard (Brussels, 1969), pp. 3–11 Google Scholar.

17. Quinn, K., Latin Explorations (London, 1968), pp. 80-3Google Scholar; Robinson, C.E. in G&R 12 (1965), 62-3Google Scholar; Williams (1968), pp. 185-7.