No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 June 2014
The first three books of Odes have been the most popular of Horace's works in modern scholarship, as they have consistently been his most popular poems since the Renaissance. This popularity has meant that they have played a key role as objects of modern Latin scholarship's particular concerns and developments – for example intertextuality, genre, metapoetry, the poetic book, narratology, and political colouring. This chapter will try to highlight the most important and stimulating items of scholarship from a vast range of work.
1 For the period 1945–75 Babcock 1981 is a helpful guide to criticism of the Odes.
2 Nisbet and Hubbard 1970: xxii.
3 Nisbet 1962; Hubbard 1973.
4 Nisbet and Hubbard 1970: xxiii–iv.
5 For this and other key facts on metre in the Odes, see Nisbet and Hubbard 1970: xxxviii–xlvi.
6 Lowrie 1995.
7 Nisbet and Hubbard 1970: xxiii.
8 See especially Dunn et al. 1997.
9 Collected in Fowler 2000.
10 Davis 1991: 2.
11 Here his argument has been extended by Mindt 2007.
12 Cf. Barchiesi 2001a.
13 Nisbet and Hubbard 1970: xiii–xvii.
14 Barchiesi 1996, 2001c; Harrison 2001a.
15 Paschalis 2002.
16 See especially Cavarzere 1996. For the term, see Fraenkel 1957: 159 n. 2.
17 See, for example, Holzberg 2008.
18 For a useful survey of views to 1992, see Cremona 1993.
19 Griffiths 2002.
20 Lowrie 2009a: 5.
21 Fowler 1995: 267.
22 Santirocco 1986: 153–66 (earlier version reprinted in Lowrie 2009a); Lyne 1995: 102–38.
23 Citroni 1995: 271–376 (English version in Lowrie 2009a).
24 Hubbard 1973: 18.
25 See e.g. Harrison 2001c: 11. For interesting work on the poet's construction and manipulation of the reader in the Odes, see e.g. Sutherland 2002.
26 See, for example, Rossi 1998. English translations of both Heinze and Rossi in Lowrie 2009a.
27 For the latter, see e.g. Habinek 2005.
28 E.g. Murray 1985; Lefèvre 1993; Lyons 2007.
29 See, for example, Richlin 1991.
30 Oliensis 2007: 221.
31 For the latter, see Griffin 1985.
32 E.g. Murray 1990.
33 Murray 1985.
34 Griffin 1985.
35 Mette 1961.
36 See especially Davis 1991: 118–26.
37 Commager 1957, reprinted in Lowrie 2009a.
38 Davis 2007.
39 Cf. Nisbet 1959.
40 Mariotti 1996–8: ii.78–98.
41 Kilpatrick 1986: ix; W. Johnson 1993: ix.
42 See e.g. Macleod 1979.
43 E.g. Williams 1968: 1–30; Allen et al. 1972.
44 See Harrison 1988.
45 Altman 1982.
46 Itself now a highly fashionable area of research: see Morello and Morrison 2007.
47 Harrison 1995c.
48 Stoicism was also supported by Maurach 1968.
49 Cf. e.g. Harrison 1995c.