Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T15:09:44.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Root production and turnover and carbon budgets of two contrasting grasslands under ambient and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1997

A. H. FITTER
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of York, York YO1 5YW, UK
J. D. GRAVES
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of York, York YO1 5YW, UK
J. WOLFENDEN
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YO, UK
G. K. SELF
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of York, York YO1 5YW, UK
T. K. BROWN
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of York, York YO1 5YW, UK
D. BOGIE
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of York, York YO1 5YW, UK
T. A. MANSFIELD
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YO, UK
Get access

Abstract

Monoliths of two contrasting vegetation types, a species-rich grassland on a brown earth soil over limestone and a species-poor community on a peaty gley, were transferred to solardomes and grown under ambient (350 μl l−1) and elevated (600 μl l−1) CO2 for 2 yr. Shoot biomass was unaltered but root biomass increased by 40–50% under elevated CO2. Root production was increased by elevated CO2 in the peat soil, measured both as instantaneous and cumulative rates, but only the latter measure was increased in the limestone soil. Root growth was stimulated more at 6 cm depth than at 10 cm in the limestone soil. Turnover was faster under elevated CO2 in the peat soil, but there was only a small effect on turnover in the limestone soil. Elevated CO2 reduced nitrogen concentration in roots and might have increased mycorrhizal colonization. Respiration rate was correlated with N concentration, and was therefore lower in roots grown at elevated CO2. Estimates of the C budget of the two communities, based upon root production and on net C uptake, suggest that C sequestration in the peat soil increases by c. 0·2 kg C m−2 yr−1 (=2 t ha yr−1) under elevated CO2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)