Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:28:18.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leaf structure and specific leaf mass: the alpine desert plants of the Eastern Pamirs, Tadjikistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1999

VLADIMIR I. PYANKOV
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Physiology, Urals State University, Ekaterinburg 620083, Russia
ALEXANDRA V. KONDRATCHUK
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Physiology, Urals State University, Ekaterinburg 620083, Russia
BILL SHIPLEY
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1K 2R1, Canada
Get access

Abstract

This study examines interrelationships between eight leaf attributes (specific leaf mass, area, dry mass, lamina thickness, mesophyll cell number per cm2, mesophyll cell volume, chloroplast volume, and number of chloroplasts per mesophyll cell) in field-grown plants of 94 species from the Eastern Pamir Mountains, at elevations between 3800 and 4750 m. Unlike most other mountain areas, the Eastern Pamirs, Karakorum system, Tadjikistan provide localities where low temperatures and radiation combine with moisture stress at high altitudes. For all the attributes measured, significant differences were found between plants with different mesophyll types. Leaves with dorsiventral palisade structure (dorsal palisade, ventral spongy mesophyll cells) had thicker leaves with larger but fewer mesophyll cells, containing more and larger chloroplasts. These differences in mesophyll type are reflected in differences in the total surface of mesophyll cells per unit leaf area (Ames/A) or volume (Ames/V). Plants with isopalisade leaf structure (palisade cells under both dorsal and ventral surfaces) are more commonly xerophytes and their increased values of Ames/A and Ames/V decrease CO2 mesophyll resistance, which is an important adaptation to drought. Path analysis shows the critical importance of mesophyll cell volume in leading to the covariance between the different leaf attributes and hence to specific leaf mass (SLM), even though mesophyll cell volume is not itself strongly correlated with SLM. This is because mesophyll cell volume increases SLM through its effects on leaf thickness and chloroplast number per cell, but decreases SLM through its negative effect on mesophyll cell density.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Trustees of the New Phytologist 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)