Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T07:29:08.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unfolding macroprudential mechanisms: central bank-led mechanisms during the post-Global Financial Crisis Turkish experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2022

Sinan Akgünay*
Affiliation:
Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The Global Financial Crisis of 2008 was followed by an increased volatility in capital flows, posing considerable macro-financial risks, especially for emerging markets. Turkey addressed these macro-financial risks between 2010 and 2011. Principal decision makers at the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey took policy actions by introducing policy mixes that trigger causal mechanisms informing the behaviour of bankers and their customers at the macro level to contain such risks. Utilising insights from causal mechanisms theory, critical realism, and realist evaluation, this article explores how the Central Bank implemented the policy mix. Our central argument is that at the macro level (i.e., structural and institutional contexts), causal mechanisms link actions with micro-level contexts (i.e., perceptions and reasoning of the target audience), whilst at the micro level, multiple causal mechanisms link policy outcomes with actor behaviour through non-linear feedback mechanisms. Our article contributes to the causal mechanisms literature by linking policy mixes and policy outcomes via causal mechanisms that informed agential actions and outcomes containing macro-financial risks.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akçelik, Y, Aysan, AF and Oduncu, A (2013) Central Banking in Making during the Post-crisis World and the Policy-Mix of the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice 2, 518.Google Scholar
Akkaya, Y and Gürkaynak, R (2012) Cari açık, bütçe dengesi, finansal istikrar ve para politikası: Heyecanlı bir dönemin izi. Iktisat İşletme ve Finans 27, 93119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alper, K, Kara, H and Yörükoğlu, M (2012) Rezerv Opsiyon Mekanizması. CBT EconomicGoogle Scholar
Alper, K, Kara, H and Yörükoğlu, M (2013a) Alternative Tools to Manage Capital Flow Volatility. BIS Papers 73, 335352.Google Scholar
Alper, K, Kara, H and Yörükoğlu, M (2013b) Reserve Option Mechanism. Central Bank Review 13, 114 Google Scholar
Anderson, PJJ, Blatt, R, Christianson, MK, Grant, MA, Marquis, C, Neuman, EJ, Sonenshein, S and Sutcliffe, MK (2006) Understanding Mechanisms in Organizational Research Reflections from a Collective Journey. Journal of Management Inquiry 15, 102113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aysan, AF, Fendoglu, S and Kilinc, M (2015) Macroprudential Policies as Buffer against Volatile Cross-border Capital Flows. The Singapore Economic Review 60, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A (2013) New Political Economy of the Macroprudential Ideational Shift. New Political Economy 18, 112139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakır, C (2017) How can interactions among interdependent structures, institutions, and agents inform financial stability? What we have still to learn from Global Financial Crisis. Policy Sciences 50, 217239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakır, C (2021) Actions, contexts, mechanisms and outcomes in macroprudential policy design and implementation. Public Policy and Administration 36, 205231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakır, C (2022) Why do comparative public policy and political economy scholars need an analytic eclectic view of structure, institution and agency? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 5, 430451.Google Scholar
Bakır, C and Çoban, MK (2018) Policy analysis and capacity in the Central Bank of Turkey. In Bakır, C and Ertan, G (eds), Policy Analysis in Turkey. Bristol: Policy Press, 215233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakır, C and Çoban, MK (2019) How can a seemingly weak state in the financial services industry act strong? New Perspectives on Turkey 61, 7196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakır, C and Jarvis, DSL (2017) Contextualising the context in policy entrepreneurship and institutional change. Policy and Society 36, 465478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakır, C, Akgünay, S and Çoban, MK (2021) Why does the combination of policy entrepreneur and institutional entrepreneur roles matter for the institutionalization of policy ideas? Policy Sciences 54, 397422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaskar, R (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R (2008) A Realist Theory of Science, 2nd ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Başçı, E (2011) The Turkish Experience. Bank of Indonesia and IMF Joint Conference, 11 March.Google Scholar
Başçı, E (2012) Monetary Policy of CBRT after GFC. Insight Turkey, 2 February.Google Scholar
Başçı, E and Kara, H (2011) Finansal Istikrar ve Para Politikası. Working Paper no. 11/08. Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, May.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W and Abrahamsen, A (2005) Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomed Science 36, 421441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennet, A and Checkel, J (ed) (2015) Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biesbroek, R, Termeer, CJAM, Klostermann, J and Kabat, P (2014) Rethinking barriers to adaptation: Mechanism-based explanation of impasses in the governance of an innovative adaptation measure. Global Environmental Change 26, 108118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buechler, MS (2011) Understanding Social Movements: Theories from the Classical Era to the Present. Paradigm Publishers. Google Scholar
Bunge, M (1997) Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27, 410465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, M (2004) How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34, 182210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, GA and Reinhart, MC (2000) Fear of floating. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 379408.Google Scholar
Capano, G and Howlett, M (2021) Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design. Public Policy and Administration 36, 141162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Bank of Republic of Turkey (2011a) Finansal İstikrar Raporu Aralık 2010. Ankara: TCMB.Google Scholar
Central Bank of Republic of Turkey (2011b) Finansal İstikrar Raporu Aralık 2010. Ankara: TCMB.Google Scholar
Central Bank of Republic of Turkey (2012) Yıllık Rapor 2011. Ankara: TCMB.Google Scholar
Coleman, P (2019) An examination of positivist and critical realist philosophical approaches. International Journal of Caring Sciences 12, 12181224.Google Scholar
Davis, G and Marquis, C (2005) Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century. Organization Science 16, 332343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, TG and Lynch, JF (2009) Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative Political Studies 42, 11431166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, A (2017) Applying critical realism in qualitative research methodology meets method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20, 181194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J (2008) The mechanismic worldview: Thinking inside the box. British Journal of Political Science 3, 161179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J (2010) Causal mechanisms: Yes, but…. Comparative Political Studies 43, 14991526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, H (1974) Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, P (2005) Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, P and Bearman, P (eds) (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, P and Swedberg, R (1998) Social mechanisms: An introductory essay. In Hedström, P and Swedberg, R (eds.) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, P and Wennberg, K (2016) Causal mechanisms in organization and innovation studies. Linkoping, Institute of Analytical Sociology Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Hedström, P and Ylikoski, P (2010) Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 36, 4967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, K and Dickson, K (2021) Realist synthesis: A critique and an alternative. Journal of Critical Realism 20, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2011) Recent Experiences in Managing Capital Flows: Cross-Cutting Themes and Possible Policy Framework. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2011/021411a.pdf.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2012) Turkey financial system stability assessment. Report 12/261.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2016) Turkey’s experience with macroprudential policy. BIS Papers 86: 123139.Google Scholar
Kara, H (2012) Monetary policy in Turkey after the global crisis. Working Paper 12(17). Ankara: CBRT.Google Scholar
Kara, H (2015) Faiz Koridoru ve Para Politikası Duruşu. TCMB: Ekonomi Notları.Google Scholar
Kara, H (2016) Turkey’s Experience with Macroprudential Policy. BIS Papers 86. Basle: BIS.Google Scholar
Kuorikoski, J (2009) Two concepts of mechanism: Componential causal system and abstract form of interaction. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23, 143160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D (2012) Explanatory autonomy and Coleman’s Boat THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 27, 137151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J (2001) Beyond correlational analysis: Recent innovations in theory and method. Sociological Forum 16, 575593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J (2016) Mechanisms, Bayesianism, and process tracing. New Political Economy 21, 493499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, R (2004) Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of Social Sciences 34, 237259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, R (2016) Process tracing, abstraction, and varieties of cognitive interest. New Political Economy 21, 484488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, R (2006) Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, R (2013) The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pawson, R and Tilley, N (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schelling, CT (1978) Micromotives and Misbehaviour. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Streeck, W and Thelen, K (Eds.) (2005) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C (2001) Mechanisms in political processes. Annual Review of Political Science 4, 2141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yağcı, M (2017) Institutional entrepreneurship and organisational learning: Financial stability policy design in Turkey. Policy and Society 36, 539555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yağcı, M (2018) The political economy of central banking in Turkey: The macroprudential policy regime and self-undermining feedback. South European Society and Politics 23, 525545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, D (2011) Revisiting the Tinbergen Rule: Use the macroprudential tools to maintain financial stability. Banque de France, Financial Stability Review 15, 159163.Google Scholar
Yin, RK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar