Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:58:26.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Missing Links in Poverty Analysis in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization: Some Lessons from Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Fikret Şenses
Fikret Şenses*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Middle East Technical University, 06531, Ankara, Turkey, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main objective of this essay is to point out the missing links between neoliberalism on the one hand, and a comprehensive analysis of poverty and effective policies to tackle it, on the other. After identifying the main channels through which neoliberalism affects poverty, I will draw attention to the inadequacy of the neoliberal approach in coming to terms with the main reasons behind poverty, as well as in developing a comprehensive and effective mechanism for its alleviation. I emphasize the role of international institutions in determining the dominant development discourse and changes in the importance given to the issue of poverty over time. The essay links the ineffectiveness of existing poverty alleviation policies to distributional imbalances at both the global and domestic levels. Against the background of the main constraints and opportunities for effective poverty alleviation policies in individual countries, it emphasizes the need for a poverty alleviation strategy as an integral part of a broader development strategy and identifies its main premises. It calls for action on the academic, domestic and international fronts and stresses the central role of the state, a more balanced reliance on domestic and international markets, emphasis on productive employment creation, the development of effective redistribution mechanisms, and the creation of effective domestic and international constituencies as the main components of such a strategy.

Keywords

neoliberalismpoverty alleviationinternational institutionsdomestic and international coalitionsrole of the stateTurkey
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 38: Special Issue on Poverty and Social Exclusion , Spring 2008 , pp. 61 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adaman, Fikret, and Bulut, Tuğçe. Diyarbakır’dan İstanbul’a 500 Milyonluk Umut Hikayeleri, İstanbul: İletişim, 2007.Google Scholar
Akyüz, Y. “Global Rules and Markets: Constraints over Policy Autonomy in Developing Countries.” Paper presented at the International Institute for Labour Studies of the ILO, Geneva, March 2007.Google Scholar
Andersen, J. G. “The Danish Welfare State as ‘Politics for Markets’: Combining Equality and Competitiveness in a Global Economy.” New Political Economy 12, no. 1 (2007): 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydın, Zülküf. “The State, Civil Society, and Environmentalism.” In Environmentalism in Turkey: Between Democracy and Development?, edited by Adaman, Fikret and Arsel, Murat, 53–69. Ashgate: Aldershot, 2005.Google Scholar
Boratav, Korkut. “Uzaklardan bir Ses.” Cumhuriyet, 4 May 2005.Google Scholar
Doğruel, Fatma, and Doğruel, A. Suut. “Türkiye'de Bölgesel Gelir Farklılıkları ve Büyüme.” In İktisat Üzerine Yazılar I Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sınıflar Korkut Boratav'a Armağan, edited by Köse, Ahmet Haşim, Şenses, Fikret and Yeldan, Erinç, İstanbul: İletişim, 2003.Google Scholar
Erdoğan, Necmi, ed. Yoksulluk Halleri: Türkiye'de Kent Yoksulluğunun Toplumsal Görünümleri, İstanbul: İletişim, 2007.Google Scholar
Griffin, Penny. “The World Bank.” New Political Economy, 11 no. 4 (2006): 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayadev, Arjun. “Capital Account Openness and the Labour Share of Income.” Cambridge journal of Economics 31, no. 3 (2007): 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadirbeyoğlu, Zeynep. “Assessing the Efficacy of Transnational Advocacy Networks.” In Environmentalism in Turkey: Between Democracy and Development?, edited by Adaman, Fikret and Arsel, Murat, 101–116. Ashgate: Aldershot, 2005.Google Scholar
Kajimbwa, Monsiapile. “NGOs and their Role in Global South.” The International Journal of Not-For-Profit-Law 9, no. 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Kanbur, Ravi. “Economic Policy, Distribution and Poverty: The Nature of Disagreements.” World Development 29, no. 6 (2001): 1083–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyman, Fuat. “Modernity, Democracy, and Civil Society.” In Environmentalism in Turkey: Between Democracy and Development?, edited by Adaman, Fikret and Arsel, Murat, 35–50. Ashgate: Aldershot, 2005.Google Scholar
Morduch, Jonathan. “The Microfinance Schism.” World Development 28, no. 4 (2000): 617–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Önder, Harun, and Şenses, Fikret. “Türkiye'de Yoksulluk ve Yoksulluk Düşüncesi.” In iktisat. Siyaset, Devlet Üzerine Yazılar. Prof. Dr. Kemali Saybasılı'ya Armağan, edited by Ülman, Burak and Akça, İsmet, 199–221. İstanbul: Bağlam, 2005.Google Scholar
Pamuk, Şevket. Economic Change in Twentieth Century Turkey: Is the Class More than Half Full? The American University of Paris, Working paper No: 41, 2007.Google Scholar
Panic, M. “Does Europe Need Neoliberal Reforms?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31, no. 1 (2007): 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. “Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank's Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform.” Journal of Economic Literature 44, no. 4 (2006): 973–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şenses, Fikret. “Economic Crisis as an Instigator of Distributional Conflict: The Turkish Case in 2001.” In The Turkish Economy in Crisis, edited by Öniş, Ziya and Rubin, Barry, 92–119. London: Frank Cass, 2003.Google Scholar
Şenses, Fikret. Küreselleşmenin Öteki Yüzü: Yoksulluk. İstanbul: İletişim, 2001.Google Scholar
Şenses, Fikret. “Yoksullukla Mücadele: Temel Yaklaşımlar, Sorunlar, Kurumlar ve Öneriler.” Cumhuriyet, 31 January 2005.Google Scholar
Şenses, Fikret. “Yoksullukla Mücadelenin Neresindeyiz? Gözlem ve Öneriler.” In iktisat Üzerine Yazılar I, Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sınıflar, edited by Köse, Ahmet Haşim, Şenses, Fikret and Yeldan, Erinç, 319–356. İstanbul: İletişim, 2003.Google Scholar
Şenses, Fikret, and Koyuncu, Murat. “Socioeconomic Effects of Economic Crises: A Comparative Analysis of the Experiences of Indonesia, Argentina and Turkey.” In Neoliberal Globalization as New Imperialism: Case Studies on Reconstruction of the Periphery, edited by Köse, Ahmet Haşim, Şenses, Fikret and Yeldan, Erinç, 197–223. New York: Nova Publishers, 2008.Google Scholar
Thorbecke, E. “The Evolution of the Development Doctrine, 1950-2005.” In WIDER Conference on the Future of Development Economics, 2005. Helsinki, 2006.Google Scholar
UNDP Human Development Report 2007/2008. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Wade, R. H. “Is Globalization Reducing Poverty and Inequality.” World Development 32, no. 4 (2004): 567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, Robert Hunter. “Making the World Development Report 2000: Attacking Poverty.” World Development 29, no. 8 (2001): 1435–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahid, Abu N. M. “The Grameen Bank and Poverty Alleviation in Bangladesh: Theory, Evidence and Limitations.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 53, no. 1 (1994): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Heloise. “The Imposition of a Global Development Architecture: The Example of Microcredit.” Review of International Studies 28 (2002): 537–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar