Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:03:14.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Literary Portrayal of Mehmed II in Turkish Historical Fiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Halim Kara
Halim Kara*
Affiliation:
Department of Turkish Language and Literature, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the portrayal of Mehmed II, the conqueror of Istanbul, in Turkish historical fiction, as well as the literary and ideological implications of his portrayal with regard to Turkish national identity. Since the early Turkish Republic, Mehmed II has been described as a major character in over thirty historical novels. The article argues that over time the literary characterization of Mehmed II in Turkish fiction has undergone substantial change. During the early republican period, historical fiction adopted an ambivalent attitude toward Mehmed II. While one historical novel under discussion focuses mostly on Mehmed II's despotism and aggressive tendencies, another novel contemplates his military bravery and his ability to govern. However, with the arrival of the multi-party system in 1950, these ambivalent approaches toward Mehmed II changed, and he began to be portrayed as the ideal Turkish statesman, gaining the status of a national hero. The latter attitude toward him dominated historical fiction writing as late as in the early 1990s. At that time, Turkish historical meta-fiction began to portray a more complex and ambiguous Mehmed II, thus both challenging as well as re-producing his previous representations.

Keywords

Mehmed IITurkish historical fictionhistorical fictionhistory and criticismidentity
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 36: Special Issue on Literature and the Nation , Spring 2007 , pp. 71 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
Aytaç, Gürsel. Çağdaş Türk Romanları Üzerine incelemeler. Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları, 1999.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. S/Z: An Essay. Translated by Miller, Richard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1974.Google Scholar
Byatt, A.S.On Histories and Stories: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Copeaux, Etienne. Türk Tarih Tezinden Türk-islam Sentezine, İstanbul: İletişim, 2006.Google Scholar
Cowart, David. History and the Contemporary Novel. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Evin, Ahmet Ö. “Novelists: New Cosmopolitanism versus Social Pluralism.” In Turkey and the West: Changing Political and Cultural Identities, edited by Heper, Metin, Öncü, Ayşe and Kramer, Heinz, 92–115. London: I. B. Tauris, 1993.Google Scholar
Fleishman, Avrom. The English Historical Novel: Walter Scott to Virginia Woolf. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Furrer, Priska. “Kurgusal İletişimde Osmanlı Tarihinin Yeniden Kurulması ve irdelenmesi.” In Tarih ve Roman, edited by Çeri, Bahriye, 77–92. İstanbul: Can Yayınları, 2001.Google Scholar
Gerçek, Şenel. “Boğazkesen ve Tarihsel Roman.” In Tarih ve Roman, edited by Çeri, Bahriye, 41–65. İstanbul: Can Yayınları, 2001.Google Scholar
Gürsel, Nedim. Boğazkesen: Fatih'in Romanı, İstanbul: Can Yayınları, 2001.Google Scholar
Gürsel, Nedim. “Tarihsel Roman Tarihi Yorumlayan Romandır.” Gösteri May 1997, 74–75.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodern: History, Theory, Fiction. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Jusdanis, Gregory. Belated Modernity and Aesthetic Culture: Inventing National Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Koçak, Orhan. “1920'lerden 1970'lere Kültür Politikaları.” In Modern Türkiye'de Siyasi Düşünce: Kemalizm, vol. 2, edited by İnsel, Ahmet, 371–424. İstanbul: İletişim, 2002.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Historical Novel. Translated by Mitchell, Hannah and Mitchell, Stanley. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Moran, Berna. Türk Romanına Eleştirel Bir Bakış 3: Sevgi Soysal'dan Bilge Karasu'ya. İstanbul: İletişim, 1998.Google Scholar
[Sertelli], Fahrettin, İskender, İstanbulu Nasıl Aldık? İstanbul: Muallim Ahmet Halit Kütüphanesi, 1930.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D.National Identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Şapolyo, Enver D. Fatih İstanbul Kapılarında, İstanbul: Rafet Zaimler Yayınevi, 1953.Google Scholar
Tan, Turhan. Akından Akına. İstanbul: İnkılap Kitabevi, 1960.Google Scholar
Tanpınar, Ahmet Hamdi. Yahya Kemal, İstanbul: Dergah Yayınları, 1995.Google Scholar
Taşkın, Yüksel. “Muhafazakar Bir Proje Olarak Türk-islam Sentezi.” In Modern Türkiye'de Siyasi Düşünce: Muhafazâkarhk, vol. 5, edited by Çiğdem, Ahmet, 361–401. İstanbul: İletişim, 2003.Google Scholar
Taştan, Zeki. “Türk Romanında İstanbul'un Fethi ve Fatih.” In Türk Edebiyatında istanbul'un Fethi ve Fatih, edited by Yetiş, Kazım, 217–436. İstanbul: Kitabevi, 2005.Google Scholar
Tepedelenlioğlu, Nizamettin Nazif. Kara Davud. Vol. 1. İstanbul: Türkiye Matbaası, 1928.Google Scholar
Tepedelenlioğlu, Nizamettin Nazif. Kara Davud. İstanbul: Ak Basın ve Yayın, 1973.Google Scholar
Tepedelenlioğlu, Nizamettin Nazif. Kara Davud. Vol. 2. İstanbul: Türkiye Matbaası, 1929.Google Scholar
Türkeş, A. Ömer. “Milli Edebiyattan Milliyetçi Romanlara.” In Modern Türkiye'de Siyasi Düşünce: Milliyetçilik, vol. 4, edited by Bora, Tanıl, 811-28. İstanbul: İletişim, 2003.Google Scholar
Türkeş, A. Ömer. “Romana Yazılan Tarih.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 91 (2001/2002): 166–213.Google Scholar
Uysal-Elkatip, Zeynep. “‘Modernleşen’ Türk Edebiyatına Bir Bakış.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 81 (1999): 127-38.Google Scholar
Yörük, Zafer. “Politik Psişe Olarak Türk Kimliği.” In Modern Türkiye'de Siyasi Düşünce: Milliyetçilik, vol. 4, edited by Tanıl, Bora, 309-23. İstanbul: İletişim, 2003.Google Scholar