Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:30:27.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domesticating the avant-garde in a nationalist era: Aesthetic modernism in 1930s Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2015

Duygu Köksal
Duygu Köksal*
Affiliation:
The Atatürk Institute for Modern Turkish History, Boğaziçi University, 34342 Bebek, İstanbul, Turkey, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the rise of aesthetic modernism in Turkey’s early republican era (i.e., the late 1920s and the 1930s), with an emphasis on the influence of international cultural currents on Turkey’s intelligentsia. The paper concentrates on the modernist ideas and works of the D Group, who advocated a high modernism in the plastic arts, and the literary modernism of the socialist poet Nâzım Hikmet (Ran). Firstly, it addresses the historiographical argument that aesthetic modernism in Turkey was a derivative enterprise, a low-grade replica of European modernism. Secondly, it argues that the early republican intelligentsia found itself in a dilemma with regard to modernist currents. For them, aesthetic modernism was a sign of the modern epoch, but it also carried a radical potential for a critique of bourgeois modernity. Aesthetic modernism not only promised change, functionality, and renewal, but also manifested such disturbing symptoms of modernity as individualism, melancholy, degeneration, and restlessness. The paper reaches the conclusion that figures such as the D Group artists and Nâzım Hikmet translated the avant-garde international currents of aesthetic modernism into the early republican context, opting for positive and optimistic versions of modernism rather than adopting its more alienating, pessimistic, and despairing features. Through their works, an intellectual debate on aesthetic modernism was initiated in early republican Turkey.

Keywords

Aesthetic modernismnationalisminternationalismNâzım HikmetD Grouprepublican Turkey.
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 52 , May 2015 , pp. 29 - 53
Copyright
© New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguiar, Marian. “Nazım Hikmet’s Modernism of Development.” Journal of Modern Literature 30, no. 4 (Summer 2007): 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahıska, Meltem. “Occidentalism: The Historical Fantasy of the Modern.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 102, no. 2–3 (Spring–Summer 2003): 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, Feroz. The Making of Modern Turkey. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Akcan, Esra. Architecture in Translation: Germany, Turkey and the Modern House. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Artun, Deniz. Paris’ten Modernlik Tercümeleri: Académie Julian’da İmparatorluk ve Cumhuriyet Öğrencileri. İstanbul: İletişim, 2007.Google Scholar
Aslanoğlu, İnci. “1930’lar: Türk Mimarisinde Erken Modernizm.” In Cumhuriyetin Mekanları, Zamanları, İnsanları, edited by Elvan Altan Ergut and Bilge İmamoğlu, 25–29. Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları, 2010.Google Scholar
Bahun-Radunovic, Sanja and Pourgoris, Marinos, eds. The Avant-Garde and the New Margin: New Territories of Modernism. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Baltacıoğlu, İsmail Hakkı. “Resim Devrimini Nasıl Yaptım?” Yeni Adam 119 (1936): 4.Google Scholar
Bedri, Rahmi (Eyüboğlu). “Yeniler ve Yeni Resim.” AR (March 1938): 6–9.Google Scholar
Ben-Ghiat, Ruth. Fascist Modernities: Italy, 1922–1945. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Berk, İlhan and Edgü, Amelie. Yurt Gezileri ve Yurt Resimleri, 1938–1943. İstanbul: Milli Reassürans, 1998.Google Scholar
Berk, Nurullah. “Sanat ve Devlet.” AR, no. 12 (December 1937): 1–2.Google Scholar
Berk, Nurullah. Modern Painting and Sculpture in Turkey. Translated by Belinda Bather. Ankara: Turkish Press, Broadcasting and Tourism Department, 1950.Google Scholar
Berman, Marshall. All That is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Verso, 1982.Google Scholar
Bozdoğan, Sibel. Modernism and Nation-Building: Turkish Architectural Culture in the Early Republic. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bozdoğan, Sibel and Akcan, Esra. Turkey: Modern Architectures in History. London: Reaktion Books, 2012.Google Scholar
Clark, Katerina. “European and Russian Cultural Interactions with Turkey: 1910s–1930s.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 33, no. 2 (2013): 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dino, Abidin. “D Grubu Üzerine.” From Yazko Somut (1983). Quoted in Abidin Dino: Kültür, Sanat ve Politika Üzerine Yazılar, edited by Turgut Çeviker, 396–401. İstanbul: Adam Yayınları, 2000.Google Scholar
Dranas, Ahmet Muhip. “Resimde Ümanizma.” Güzel Sanatlar, no. 2 (1939–40): 131–154.Google Scholar
Elliott, David. “The Battle for Art.” In Art and Power: Europe under the Dictators 1930–1945, edited by Dawn Ades, Tim Benton, David Elliott, and Iain Boyd Whyte, 31–35. London: Thames and Hudson, 1995.Google Scholar
Ertürk, Nergis. “Surrealism and the Turkish Script Arts.” Modernism/Modernity 17, no. 1 (January 2010): 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falih, Rıfkı (Atay). Moskova, Roma. Ankara: Muallim Halit Kitabevi, 1932.Google Scholar
Falih, Rıfkı (Atay). “Faşizm Havası (Roma, Tiran, Atina).” Hakimiyeti Milliye, 1931.Google Scholar
Griffin, Roger. Modernism and Fascism: The Sense of a Beginning under Mussolini and Hitler. New York: Palgrave and Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İsmail, Hakkı (Baltacıoğlu). Demokrasi ve Sanat. İstanbul: Kanaat Kütüphanesi, 1931.Google Scholar
Juric, Dubravka and Suvakovic, Misko, eds. Impossible Histories: Historical Avant-Gardes, Neo-Avant-Gardes, and Post-Avant-Gardes in Yugoslavia, 1918–1991. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kahraman, Hasan Bülent. Türk Şiiri, Modernizm, Şiir. Ankara: Büke Yayınları, 2000.Google Scholar
Kapur, Geeta. When Was Modernism: Essays on Contemporary Cultural Practice in India. New Delhi: Tulika, 2000.Google Scholar
Koçak, Orhan. Modern ve Ötesi: Elli Yılın Sanatına Kenar Notları. İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2007.Google Scholar
Koçak, Orhan. “Yahya Kemal’le Nâzım Hikmet Arasından Nâzım Hikmet.“ In Kopuk Zincir: Modern Şiir Üzerine Denemeler, 9–23. İstanbul: Metis, 2012.Google Scholar
Köksal, Duygu. “Art and Power in Turkey: Culture, Aesthetics and Nationalism during the Single Party Era.” New Perspectives on Turkey 31 (Fall 2004): 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köksal, Duygu. “Cumhuriyet İdeolojisi ve Estetik Modernizm: Baltacıoğlu, Yeni Zamanlar ve Bauhaus.” In Bauhaus: Modernleşmenin Tasarımı, Türkiye’de Mimarlık, Sanat, Tasarım Eğitimi ve Bauhaus, edited by Ali Artun and Esra Aliçavuşoğlu, 241–253. İstanbul: İletişim, 2009.Google Scholar
Lewis, Pericles. The Cambridge Introduction to Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Memet, Fuat (Bengü). Nâzım Hikmet. İstanbul: Adam Yayınları, 2000.Google Scholar
Naef, Silvia. A la Recherche d’une Modernité Arabe: l’Evolution des Arts Plastique en Egypte, au Liban et en Irak. Geneva: Slatkine, 1996.Google Scholar
Nâzım, Hikmet. Resimli Ay (July 1938): 28–29.Google Scholar
Nâzım, Hikmet. Kemal Tahir’e Mapusaneden Mektuplar. İstanbul: AD Yayıncılık, 1996.Google Scholar
Nâzım, Hikmet. Yazılar 1. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2002.Google Scholar
Nâzım, Hikmet. Nâzım Hikmet, Beyond the Walls: Selected Poems. Translated by Ruth Christie, Richard McKane, and Talat Sait Halman. London: Anvil Press Poetry and Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2002.Google Scholar
Nâzım, Hikmet. Poems of Nazım Hikmet. Translated by Randy Blasing and Mutlu Konuk. New York: Persea Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Necip, Fazıl (Kısakürek). “Sanat Hakkında.” Varlık 52 (1 September 1935): 50.Google Scholar
Gökalp, Ziya. Principles of Turkism. Translated by Robert Devereux. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1968.Google Scholar
Göral, Özgür Sevgi. “Patlamaya Hazır Bir Şimdi: Putları Yıkıyoruz.” Toplum ve Bilim 94 (2002): 189–211.Google Scholar
Gürbilek, Nurdan. “Dandies and Originals: Authenticity, Belatedness and the Turkish Novel.” South Atlantic Quarterly 102, no. 2–3 (Spring–Summer 2003): 599–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitter, Partha. The Triumph of Modernism: India’s Artists and the Avant-Garde, 1922–1947. London: Reaktion Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Öndin, Nilüfer. Cumhuriyet’in Kültür Politikası ve Sanat, 1923–1950. İstanbul: İnsancıl Yayınları, 2003.Google Scholar
Özaslan, Nuray and Akalın, Aysu. “Architecture and Image: The Example of Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 47, no. 6 (2011): 911–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özsezgin, Kaya. Cumhuriyetin 75. Yılında Türk Resmi. Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 1998.Google Scholar
Parla, Taha. Ziya Gökalp, Kemalizm ve Türkiye’de Korporatizm. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1993.Google Scholar
Safa, Peyami. “Leopold Levy’nin Sergisi.” AR, no. 4 (April 1938): 4–5.Google Scholar
Sand, Jordan. House and Home in Modern Japan: Architecture, Domestic Space and Bourgeois Culture, 1880–1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2003.Google Scholar
Sülker, Kemal. Nâzım Hikmet’in Gerçek Yaşamı. İstanbul: Yalçın Yayınları, 1987.Google Scholar
Süreyya, Şevket. “Benerji Kendini Niçin Öldürdü?” Kadro, no. 4 (April 1932): 31–39.Google Scholar
Timms, Edward and Göksu, Saime. Romantic Communist: The Life and Work of Nazım Hikmet. London: Hurst & Company, 1999, 2006.Google Scholar
Tunçay, Mete. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nde Tek-Parti Yönetimi’nin Kurulması (1923–1931). Ankara: Yurt, 1981.Google Scholar
Üstel, Füsun. İmparatorluktan Ulus-Devlete Türk Milliyetçiliği: Türk Ocakları (1912–1931). İstanbul: İletişim, 1997.Google Scholar
Weisenfeld, Gennifer. Mavo, Japanese Artists and the Avant-Garde (1905–1931). Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. “When Was Modernism?” In The Politics of Modernism: Against the New Conformists, 31–48. London and New York: Verso, 1989.Google Scholar
Yakup, Kadri (Karaosmanoğlu). “Şairin Bize Anlatacağı Bir Şey Kaldı mı?” Kadro, no. 1 (January 1932): 28–30.Google Scholar
Yakup, Kadri (Karaosmanoğlu). “Bedii Heyecan.” Kadro 6 (June 1932): 19–20.Google Scholar
Yakup, Kadri (Karaosmanoğlu). “Eski Yeni.” Kadro 12 (December 1932): 25–26.Google Scholar
Yakup, Kadri (Karaosmanoğlu). “Niçin Sanatsızız?” Kadro 13 (January 1933): 32–33.Google Scholar
Yaman, Zeynep Yasa. “Türk Resminde Etkilenme ve Taklit Olgusu I.” Türkiye’de Sanat, no. 14 (May–August 1994): 26–34.Google Scholar
Yaman, Zeynep Yasa. “Sanat Tarihimizde Eski Bir Konu: Müstakil Ressamlar ve Heykeltıraşlar Birliği mi, d grubu mu?” Türkiye’de Sanat 20 (September/October 1955): 34–43.Google Scholar
Yaman, Zeynep Yasa. “Türkiye’de Kübizm ve Yeni Sanat.” Sanat Dünyamız (Winter 1993): 59–66.Google Scholar