Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:00:27.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical voices against the Bologna Process in Turkey: Neo-liberal governance in higher education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2015

Ayhan Kaya
Ayhan Kaya*
Affiliation:
Department of International Relations, Jean Monnet Chair of European Politics of Interculturalism, İstanbul Bilgi University, Eski Silahtarağa Elektrik Santralı, 34060 Eyüp, İstanbul, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes critical voices raised against the Bologna Process by various stake-holders of higher education in Turkey, such as rectors, professors, international office staff, students, and civil society organizations. The data collected through in-depth interviews were analyzed using the discourse analysis method on the basis of the interlocutors’ reflections on the Bologna Process. It is claimed in the article that most universities in Turkey have attempted a process of internationalization and institutionalization, but that there have been several impediments during the implementation of the Bologna Process. Rising Euroskepticism in Turkey has also changed the process of Europeanization in the universities. It is revealed that the structural changes made in line with the Bologna Process are perceived by several different stake-holders as neo-liberal acts, and are presented as activities of internationalization, but not of Europeanization.

Keywords

Higher educationEuropeanizationinternationalizationBologna Processneo-liberalismTurkey
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 52 , May 2015 , pp. 105 - 133
Copyright
© New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Author’s Note: I would like to express my gratitude to Ayşe Tecmen for her invaluable support as my research assistant during the course of the field research for the FP7 Project entitled “Identities and Modernities in Europe.” I am also grateful to Bianca Kaiser, Atsuko Ichijo, and Senem Aydın for their remarks and suggestions on the manuscript as well as to the reviewers of the journal for their very constructive criticisms and suggestions.

References

Arkın, Figen. “Quality Assurance or Assuring Quality: The Experience of Turkish Higher Education on Bologna Process and Quality Assurance.” EUL Journal of Social Sciences 4, no. 2 (December 2013): 55–69.Google Scholar
Barblan, Andris, Gürüz, Kemal, and Ergüder, Üstün. Higher Education in Turkey: Institutional Autonomy and Responsibility in a Modernising Society: Policy Recommendations in A Historical Perspective (Magna Charta Universitatum Observatory Publications, 2008). http://www.magna-charta.org/pdf/proceedings_atti_2008.pdf.Google Scholar
Blitz, Brad K. “From Monnet to Delors: Educational Co-operation in the European Union.” Contemporary European History 12, no. 2 (2009): 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bologna Process National Report, Turkey, 2004–2005. http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Documents/National_Report_Turkey_05.pdf.Google Scholar
Bologna Process National Report, Turkey, 2005–2007. http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Documents/National_Report_Turkey2007.pdf.Google Scholar
Bologna Process National Report, Turkey, 2007–2009. http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Documents/National_Report_Turkey_2009.pdf.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tania and Risse, Thomas. “Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe.” In The Politics of Europeanization, edited by Kevin Featherstone and Claudio M. Radaelli, 57–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tania and Thomas, Risse. “When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change.” EUI Working Papers 56 (2000).Google Scholar
Börzel, Tania. “Member State Responses to Europeanization.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2002): 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, Simon J. and Radaelli, Claudio M.. “The Europeanisation of National Policy.” Queen’s Papers on Europeanisation 1 (2004).Google Scholar
Dölen, Emre. Türkiye Üniversite Tarihi 1: Osmanlı Döneminde Darülfünun 1863–1922. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Erçetin, Şule. “Turkish Higher Education Institutions in Bologna Process.” Humanity and Social Sciences Journal 1, no. 1 (2006): 18–27.Google Scholar
Erdoğan, Armağan. Türk Yükseköğretiminin Yeniden Yapılanma Çalışmaları: Küresel Eğilimler ve Uluslararasılaşma Çerçevesinde Değerlendirmeler. Ankara: SDEY Press, 2013.Google Scholar
European Commission. Teaching and Learning: Towards the Learning Society. Brussels: European Commission, 1995. http://europa.eu/documents/comm/white_papers/pdf/com95_590_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth. “The Bologna Process and the Knowledge-based Economy: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach.” In Higher Education and the Knowledge-based Economy in Europe, edited by Bob Jessop, Norman Fairclough, and Ruth Wodak, 109–126. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2008.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Governmentality.” Ideology and Consciousness 6 (1979): 5–21.Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo. Letters to Christina: Reflections on My Life and Works. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Penguin Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Grek, Sotiria. “From Symbols to Numbers: The Shifting Technologies of Education Governance in Europe.” European Educational Research Journal 7, no. 2 (2008): 208–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Internationalisation and Trade in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges. OECD, 2004. http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/33730019.pdf.Google Scholar
Kaya, Ayhan. Europeanization and Tolerance in Turkey: The Myth of Toleration. London: Palgrave, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, Ruth. “The Bologna Process and the Lisbon Research Agenda: The European Commission’s Expanding Role in Higher Education Discourse.” European Journal of Education 41, no. 2 (2006): 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirişçi, Kemal. “Turkey’s ‘Demonstrative Effect’ and the Transformation of the Middle East.” Insight Turkey 13, no. 2 (2011): 33–55.Google Scholar
Kok, Wim. Facing the Challenge: The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment. Luxembourg: European Communities, 2004.Google Scholar
Mızıkacı, Fatma. “Prospects for European Integration: Turkish Higher Education.” Higher Education in Europe 30, no. 1 (2005): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mızıkacı, Fatma. “Quality Systems and Accreditation in Higher Education: An Overview of Turkish Higher Education.” Quality in Higher Education 9, no. 1 (2003): 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumark, Fritz. Boğaziçi’ne Sığınanlar: Türkiye’ye İltica Eden Alman Bilim, Siyaset ve Sanat Adamları 1933–1953. Translated by Talip Doğan Karlıbel. İstanbul: Neden Kitap, 2008.Google Scholar
Olssen, Mark and Peters, Michael A.. “Neo-liberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism.” Journal of Education Policy 20, no. 3 (2005): 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Önal, Nevzat Evrim, ed. Bologna Süreci Sorgulanıyor: AB'nin Akademik Tahakkümünün Sosyalist Tahlil, Eleştiri ve Reddiyesi. İstanbul: Yazılıma, 2011.Google Scholar
Öncü, Ayşe. “Academics: The West in the Discourse of University Reform.” In Turkey and the West: Changing Political and Cultural Identities, edited by Metin Heper, Ayşe Öncü, and Heinz Kramer, 142–176. London: I.B. Tauris and Co., 1993.Google Scholar
Özalay-Şanlı, Eren. “Evaluating Current Turkish Politics in Light of Democratization and Europeanization Theories: The Case of Education Reforms.” Boğaziçi Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies 25, no. 2 (2011): 7–25.Google Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. “AKP at the Crossroads: Erdoğan’s Majoritarian Drift.” South European Society and Politics (2014). doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.920571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özel, Soli. “A Moment of Elation: The Gezi Protests/Resistance and the Fading of the AKP Project.” In The Making of a Protest Movement in Turkey: #occupygezi, edited by Umut Özkırımlı, 7–24. London: Palgrave, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pépin, Luce. The History of European Cooperation in Education and Training: Europe in the Making – An Example. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. “The New Institionalism and European Integration.” In European Integration Theory, edited by Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez, 125–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Presidency Conclusions. Lisbon European Council, March 23–24, 2000. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm.Google Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio M. “Europeanisation: Solution or Problem?” European Integration Online Papers 8, no. 16 (2004): 143–164.Google Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio M. “Policy Transfer in the European Union: Institutional Isomorphism as a Source of Legitimacy.” Governance 13, no. 1 (2000): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Roberts, Peter. “Neo-liberalism, Performativity and Research.” Review of Education 53, no. 4 (2007): 349–365.Google Scholar
Robertson, Susan L. and Keeling, Ruth. “Stirring the Lions: Strategy and Tactics in Global Higher Education.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 6, no. 2 (2008): 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Angelo. “Studying Anthropology in the Age of the University Reform.” Social Anthropology 18, no. 1 (2010): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. “Governing by Numbers: Figuring out Democracy.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 16, no. 7 (1991): 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas and Miller, Peter. “Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government.” The British Journal of Sociology 43, no. 2 (1992): 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
T.C. Başbakanlık Secretariat General for EU Affairs. Turkey’s European Union Communication Strategy (EUCS). Ankara, January 2010. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/strateji/abis_en1.pdf.Google Scholar
Shore, Cris and Taitze, Mira. “Who ‘Owns’ the University? Institutional Autonomy and Academic Freedom in an Age of Knowledge Capitalism.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 10, no. 2 (2012): 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarman, Bülent. The European Union and the Modernization of the Turkish Education System. New York: Cambria Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Thorsten, Husén. “The Idea of the University: Changing Roles, Current Crisis and Future Challenges.” In Higher Education in an International Perspective: Critical Issues, edited by Zaghloul Morsy and Phillip G. Altbach, 3–20. New York: Garland Publishing, 1996.Google Scholar
Torfing, Jacob. “Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, edited by David Howarth and Jacob Torfing, 1–32. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Wickham, James. “Worshipping at the Shrine of the Knowledge-based Society?” In Innovation in Low-Tech Firms and Industries, edited by Hartmut Hirsh-Kreinsen and David Jacobson, 267–284. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. The Discourses of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. London: MacMillan Palgrave, 2010.Google Scholar
Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). Türkiye’nin Yüksek Öğretim Stratejisi. Ankara: YÖK, 2007. http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/30217/yok_strateji_kitabi/27077070-cb13-4870-aba1-6742db37696b.Google Scholar
Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). Vakıf Üniversiteleri Raporu. Ankara: YÖK, 2007.Google Scholar
Yükseköğretim Kanunu (Kanun No. 2547). Law on Higher Education (Law No. 2547). Resmî Gazete, no. 17506, November 6, 1981.Google Scholar