Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:19:04.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anti-, non-, or post-Saidian?: The challenge of discussing German Orientalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Malte Fuhrmann
Malte Fuhrmann*
Affiliation:
Orient-lnstitut İstanbul, Susam Sok, 16-18/8, TR-34433 Cihangir-İstanbul, Turkey, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 47: Special Issue on Turkey's Experience with Neoliberal Policies and Globalization , Fall 2012 , pp. 221 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berman, Nina. Orientalismus, Kolonialismus und Moderne: Zum Bild des Orients in der deutschsprachigen Kuttur um 1900. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1996.Google Scholar
Federal Archives — Military Archive, Freiburg i. Br., Imperial Navy Series; ΒΑ-MA RM 40/214.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer ed. “German Orientalism.” Special issue, Comparative Studies on Africa, South Asia and the Middle East 24, no. 2 (2004).Google Scholar
Kontje, Todd Curtis. German Orientalisms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öztürk, Ali Osman. Alman Oryantalizmi: 19. Yüzyıl Alman Kültüründe Türk Motifi. Ankara: Vadi, 2000.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Vintage, 1978.Google Scholar