Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:28:17.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Structures: Coercion versus Co-ordination. Some Lessons for Turkey*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Fikret Adaman  and
Zeynep Kadirbeyoğlu
Fikret Adaman
Affiliation:
Department of Economies, Boğaziçi University, [email protected]
Zeynep Kadirbeyoğlu
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Boğaziçi University, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 20 , Spring 1999 , pp. 143 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors thank Pat Devine and Ziya Öniş for their stimulating comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

Amin, A. and Thomas, D. 1996. “The Negotiated Economy: State and Civic Institutions in Denmark,” Economy and Society, 25(2), pp.255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adaman, F. and Sertel, M.R. 1997. “The Changing Role of the State: the Turkish Case,” in Handoussa, H. (ed.), Economic Transition in the Middle East, Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, pp. 167–182.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, N.J. 1982. “Directly-Unproductive Profit-Seeking (DUP) Activities,” Journal of Political Economy, 90, pp. 988–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, N.J. 1987. “Directly-Unproductive Profit-Seeking (DUP) Activities,” in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Buchanan, M.J. and Tollison, R.D. (eds) 1984. Toward a Theory of Rent-Seeking Society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Buğra, A. 1994. State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative State. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Cadot, O. 1987. “Corruption as a Gamble,” Journal of Public Economics, 33, pp. 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumings, B. 1998. “The Korean Crisis and the End of ‘Late’ Development,” New Left Review, 231, pp.43–72.Google Scholar
Devine, P. 1988. Democracy and Economic Planning. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dore, R. 1997. “The Distinctiveness of Japan,” in Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (eds), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London: Sage Publications, pp. 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, B. 1994. Politician's Dilemma. Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İnsel, A. 1995. Türkiye Toplumunun Bunalımı. Istanbul: Birikim Yayınlan.Google Scholar
Insel, A. 1996. Düzen ve Kalkınma Kıskacında Türkiye: Kalkınma Sürecinde Devletin Rolü. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.Google Scholar
Kelly, G., Kelly, D. and Gamble, A. (eds) 1997. Stakeholder Capitalism. Hampshire: London.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, R. 1988. Controlling Corruption. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, O.A. 1990. “Government Failures in Development,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3), pp. 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, O.A. 1994. “Economists' Changing Perceptions of Government,” Weltwirtschaftliche Archive, 127, pp. 417–431.Google Scholar
Levine, D.L. and Tyson, L.D. 1990. “Participation, Productivity, and the Firm's Environment,” in Blinder, A.S. (ed.), Paying for Productivity. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, pp. 183–237.Google Scholar
Long, D. 1997. “Book Review of Weiss and Hobson (1997),” Australian Journal of Political Science, 32:1, pp.139-41.Google Scholar
Mann, M. 1988. States, War and Capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Olson, M. 1965. Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oniş, Z. 1998. State and Market: The Political Economy of Turkey in Comparative Perspective. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University.Google Scholar
Oniş, Z. and Sunar, I. 1992. Sanayileşmede Yönetim ve Toplumsal Uzlaşı. İstanbul: TUSİAD Yayınları.Google Scholar
Sunar, I. 1996. “State, Society, and Democracy in Turkey,” in Mastny, V. and Nation, R.C. (eds), Turkey between East and West. Colorado: Westview Press, pp.141–154.Google Scholar
Sunley, P. 1997. “Book Review of Weiss and Hobson (1997),” Political Geography, 16:5, pp.435-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, R. 1998. “The Asian Debt-and-development Crisis of 1997-?: Causes and Consequences,” World Development, 26:8, pp.1535–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, L. and Hobson, J.M. 1995. States and Economic Development: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar