Article contents
Extract
At the present time women are becoming more and more integrated into the public and professional spheres; they are taking posts of responsibility not only within the home, but outside of it, where they are being accepted not just as feminists but as members of the community with particular skills and aptitudes, which are not, moreover, merely ‘womanly’ skills and aptitudes. In many professional situations it is now no longer sensible to ask whether the applicant for a post is a man or a woman; the only criteria applied are those of professional competence. This change within the secular society is not reflected within Church communities. Women are systematically discriminated against; the most crude and powerful symbol of this is their exclusion from the sanctuary. Now, it is argued that ‘tradition’ supports this discrimination and any attack on it is an attack on the living and holy tradition of the Church, and moreover that woman’s place is sharply and strictly defined in scripture. We shall not be able to examine both of these objections, but must content ourselves with a partial examination of the second. Partial because we shall only look at the four Gospels and not at the Old Testament or the other writings of the New Testament. Also much of the work that has been done on this question is based on a study of the role of the Mother of God, but very little has been attempted in the study of the roles of other women mentioned in the Gospel narratives. Therefore, we shall concentrate on this area, hoping to discuss the unique and all-important place of the Mother of God later. Finally we should make clear that in spite of the content, this article is not a statement of a merely ‘feminist’ point of view. Issues will be raised that go far beyond the single problem of the status of women; rather this problem should be seen as one of many which present a moral challenge to the Church and which are all interrelated. Sexual discrimination is only one form of discrimination which may afflict a ‘Christian’ community.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1971 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
page 291 note 1 Orthodox Jewish Prayer Book Quoted in Rabbinic Theology, edited by Montifiore, C. G. and Loewe, H. (London, 1938), 507Google Scholar.
page 292 note 1 Moore, G. F., Judaism (Cambridge, 1927), p. 130Google Scholar.
page 292 note 2 See Timothy 1, 13‐15, where Paul's rabbinic training is apparent.
page 292 note 3 Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 12, p. 157Google Scholar. (Also: ‘May the words of Torah be burned, they should not be handed over to women’, J. Sota, 10a.8, quoted Theological Dictionary, p. 781.)
page 292 note 4 Ibid., Vol. 10, p. 294.
page 293 note 1 This does not mean, of course, that the inner circle of disciples resembled in every other respect a rabbinic circle, rather that it should be seen in this context.
page 293 note 2 Gordon, G. H., Before the Bible (London, 1962), pp. 184‐95Google Scholar.
page 294 note 1 cf. R. Jose ben Johnan, quoted in Judaism, p. 269.
page 294 note 2 Barclay, W., Commentary on St Matthew's Gospel (Edinburgh, 1965)Google Scholar, Vol. II, p. 313.
page 295 note 1 cf. Matt. 24, 19; Luke 21, 23.
page 295 note 2 1431 and 1436 Rabbinu Anthology.
page 295 note 3 Theological Dictionary, p. 783.
page 296 note 1 Quoted in W. Barclay's Commentary, op. cit., Vol. 11, p. 219.
page 296 note 2 Ibid.
page 296 note 3 The translation used here was the New English Bible.
page 297 note 1 Lagrange, M. J., Commentary on St John's Gospel (Paris, 1921), p. 585Google Scholar.
page 298 note 1 The group included Salomc but not Mary, the Mother of Jesus.
- 2
- Cited by