Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:16:18.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When the Gates of Hell Fall Down: towards a modern theology of the justice of God

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Colin Gunton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The teaching that the wicked will go to hell has about it a certain logic and justice. We may not think that a loving God would wish to consign anyone to eternal torment, but that the final destination of the evil should be different from that of the good is not, on the face of the matter, unjust. A case for the extinction of the utterly evil was argued by Ulrich Simon in his Theology of Auschwitz. May it not be the case that some become so corrupted by the evil of their ways that there is nothing left for them but annihilation? ‘Extirpation is congruous with the feverish activists in annihilation. Damnation is the silent seal on their wickedness. Unforgiven and unforgivable they go to the doom which their own fantasies and crimes have already sought on earth.’ Could justice demand anything less?

Why then has the doctrine of hell fallen into such disrepute? The main cause is that we have lost the concept of the justice of God. A number of reasons for the loss can be listed. First, there is the form the doctrine often took in the tradition. At least from the time of Augustine there has been a tendency to teach that the justice of God consisted in the fact that he could, had he wished, have consigned the whole of the human race to hell, but that he graciously (gratuitously?) saved a few brands from the burning. It is not wholly an accident that folk belief has often held that an unbaptised child will go to hell.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 69 , Issue 821 , November 1988 , pp. 488 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Footnotes

1

Some of the material for this paper will appear in my forthcoming book, The Actuality of Atonement, Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1989.

References

2 Simon, Ulrich, A neology of Auschwitz. London, SPCK, 1978Google Scholar (1c 1967) p. 74.

3 Surin, Kenneth, Theology and the Problem of Evil. London: Blackwell, 1986Google Scholar.

4 MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue. London: Duckworth, 1981Google Scholar; Whose Justice? Which Rationality? London: Duckworth, 1988Google Scholar.

5 After Virtue, ch. 2.

6 Whose Justice?, p. 392.

7 See here Kuitert, H.M., Everything is Politics but Politics is not Everything. London: SCM Press, 1986Google Scholar.

8 Forsyth, P.T., The Justification of God. London: Duckworth, 1916Google Scholar.

9 Forsyth, P.T., The Church, the Gospel and Society. London: Independent Press, 1962, p. 20Google Scholar.

10 Barth, Karl, Church Dogmatics, Vol. 3/1. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1958 pp. 366ffGoogle Scholar.

11 Balthasar, Hans Urs von, The Glory of the Lord, Vol. 1. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1982, p. 472CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Yoder, John Howard, The Priestly Kingdom. Social Ethics as Gospel. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984, p. 43Google Scholar.

13 After Virtue, p. 245.