Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T05:12:30.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thomas D. Sullivan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 80 , Issue 938 , April 1999 , pp. 202 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 Etienne, Gilson, The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, translated by L.K. Shook, equivalent of the 5th and last French edition, (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1956), p. 22Google Scholar.

2 Mark Jordan, ‘Neo-Thomism,’ in Ted Honderich, ed., The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 615.

3 J.J.C. Smart and J.J. Haldane, Atheism and Theism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), 132.

4 Aquinas, for example, claims it is evident that ‘every whole is greater than its parts’ Analysts mindful of Galileo and Cantor will spontaneously ask whether Aquinas means to include infinite sets.