Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:45:05.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ten Reasons why Thomas Aquinas is Important for Ethics Today

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recently several works that study Thomas Aquinas’s ethics have been published. Why is it, too, that a return to Thomas’s ethics yields insights into his writings that have escaped us for decades, even centuries? Why is he a perennial font of reflection that prompts new writers to find fresh insights at the end of the second millennium?

The answer rests, I believe, in the fact that he captures an understanding of the moral life that is enormously helpful in forming a vision of the type of people we ought to become. In an age that wants to respect the individual conscience while maintaining a sense of the objectively right and wrong, Thomas provides a framework in which we can achieve both. In order to demonstrate how Thomas accomplishes this, I advance along the way ten key points that Thomas makes that serve as sign posts to our conclusions.

1. Rather than retreat from public life. Thomas believes that good religious life, like good theology, can be at home in the life of the city. At the age of six, Thomas’s parents sent him to the famous Benedictine Abbey, Monte Casino, where they (reasonably) hoped that he would become abbot. At fifteen, he leaves the order and, after five years of studies in Naples, enters the relatively new order of SL Dominic. As urban areas emerge for the first time in human history, the fifteen year old Thomas makes his first adult decision to leave an order that requires a vow of permanence and enters a new order already known for their work of preaching in the cities and teaching in the medieval universities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 Keenan, James, Goodness and Rightness in Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologiae (Washington: Georgetown, 1992)Google Scholar; Nelson, Daniel Mark, The Priority of Prudence: Virtue and Natural Law in Thomas Aquinas (University Park, PA: Penn. State Press, 1992)Google Scholar; Porter, Jean, The Recovery of Virtue (Westminster Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Yearley, Lee, Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

2 Scriptum super libros Sententiarum, IV, 38. 2. 4 q.a 3; See also IV. 27. 1. 2. q.a. 4 ad3; IV. 27.3.3.

3 Dedek, John, “Intrinsically Evil Acts: The Emergence of a Doctrine,”Recherches de theologie ancienne et medievale SO (1983): 191226Google Scholar; “Intrinsically Evil Acts: An Historical Study of the Mind of St. Thomas,”The Thomist 43 (1979) 385413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 See my “Distinguishing Charity As Goodness and Prudence As Rightness: A Key To Thomas' Pars Secunda”The Thomist 56 (1992) 407426;CrossRefGoogle Scholar“The Problem with Thomas Aquinas's Concept of Sin,”Heythrop Journal, July 1994.