Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:25:18.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sublime Policing: Sociology and Milbank's City of God

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Kieran Flanagan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sociology is a necessary evil on the academic landscape. It is the discipline we all like to hate. Somehow, sociology fits everywhere and yet belongs nowhere in particular. It does not have the finesse of philosophy, the vision of theology or the grace of classics, but as a mongrel child of the Enlightenment it plays about with their deepest insights. Sociology reflects modernity, but in a way that confirms an instinctive dislike of its basis. In the academic game of musical chairs, sociology is left standing, when the waltz ceases, and other disciplines sit awaiting the next score. Yet behind this facade of dislike, an odder and deeper crisis confronts sociology.

In the past two decades, philosophy, literary studies, history and classics have all become entwined in sociology which stands at the analytical crossroads directing a busy traffic in concepts up the high road of modernity. But as its rhetoric becomes woven into the humanities, the distinctive voice of sociology has become muted. Critical theory, embracing linguistics, post-structuralism, phenomenology and post-modernism, to name a few, now have squatter’s rights within sociological theory. Textual exegesis forms the basis of much critical philosophy which sociology has to recognise, but is uncertain how to use. Whereas Dilthey laid the philosophical basis for the autonomy of the cultural sciences against the clutches of the natural sciences, an equivalent exercise has yet to be undertaken for sociology in relation to the competing demands of other disciplines also to speak of culture. Despite their sophistication, modern philosophers such as Rorty, MacIntyre, Derrida and Levinas yield slight sociological insights. There are two sides to the analytical coins to be spent in the cultural marketplace. Sociology makes its own purchases, and these are not the debased offerings of the ‘thick’, incapable of reading the classical texts of philosophy in all their nuances. Too often one gets thick philosophical works with a very thin amount of sociology sandwiched in the centre. Anyhow, sociology has its own problems in dealing with culture.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 73 , Issue 861 , June 1992 , pp. 333 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 For an accessible account of his significance, see Robbins, Derek, The Work of Pierre Bourdieu, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991Google Scholar.

2 See Giddens, Anthony, Modernity and Self‐Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.Google Scholar

3 Mills, John Orme, ‘God, Man and Media: on a problem arising when theologians speak of the modem world’, in Martin, David. Mills, John Orme and Pickering, W.S.F., eds, Sociology and Theology. Alliance and Conflict, Brighton: ?he Harvester Press, 1980, p. 136Google Scholar.

4 Milbank, John, Theology and Social Theory. Beyond Secular Reason, Oxford Basil Blackwell, 1990 p.397Google Scholar.

5 ibid., p.208.

6 Lepenies, Wolf, Between Literature and Science: the Rise of Sociology, trans. Hollingdale, R.J., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

7 John Milbank, Theology and Social Theory, op cit., p.97.

8 ibid. p.109.

9 Blumenberg, Hans, The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, trans. Wallace, Robert M., Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1985Google Scholar

10 von Balthasar, Hans Urs, Theo‐Drama. Theological Dramatic Theory, vol.1. trans. Harrison, Graham, San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1988Google Scholar, see especially Part III B, pp. 493–54.

11 See for example, Martin, David, Tongues of Fire. The Explosion of Protestantism in South America, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991Google Scholar.

12 Gutierrez, Gustavo, ‘Theology and the Social Sciences’ in Sigmund, Paul E., Liberation Theology at the Crossroads. Democracy or Revolution? New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, p.219Google Scholar.

13 ibid, p.221.

14 Bourdieu, Pierre, In Other Words. Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990, p.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 John Milbank, Theology and Social Theory, op.cit., p.81.

16 Simmel, Georg, ‘The Crisis of Culture’ in Lawrence, P.A., Georg Simmel: Sociologist and European, London: Nelson, 1976, p.259Google Scholar.

17 John Milbank, Theology and Social Theory, op.cit., p.225.