Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:38:46.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Singular Iniquities: Josephine Butler and Marietta Higgs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A little over a century ago Josephine Butler was beginning to learn, with reluctance and dismay, the extent of organised child prostitution in Britain. When she tried to convey what she had learned she was often reviled as dirty-minded, corrupting and unwomanly. Her work did much to erect legal protection for children, but the possibility and practice of child sexual exploitation continued, as shown in the case notes of bodies such as the NSPCC. In 1987 a tide of hostility was unleashed against another woman, paediatrician Marietta Higgs, who had in the normal course of her work discovered signs of sexual abuse in a small and statistically unsurprising proportion of the children she cared for.

Why is it so often women—supposedly the weaker sex, less tough-minded than men—who seem to be left to face up to the most cruel and sordid social practices, and even vicariously to bear the blame for them? And why, a century after Josephine Butler’s work, is society still so ill-equipped to deal with child sexual abuse?

Josephine Butler’s involvement with girls and women forced into poverty and prostitution began in 1865 in Liverpool, when she visited the city’s vast workhouse and met some of its 5000 inhabitants. Though frightened and horrified at the conditions, and doubtful of her welcome, she sat down on the floor and began to pick oakum with the women and talk to them about their lives. Shortly afterwards she took into her house a girl called Marion who had been seduced at fifteen and abandoned, and was dying of consumption. Others followed and Josephine set up a ‘House of Rest’ for incurably ill women.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 See for instance Ferguson, H. ‘Cleveland 1898: has anything changed in 90 years?’The Guardian, 3rd May 1989, p. 27.

2 Information about Josephine Butler is drawn from Petrie, G. A Singular Iniquity: the Campaigns of Josephine Butler. Macmillan, 1971Google Scholar.

3 Butler‐Sloss, E. Report of the Inquiry into Child Abuse in Cleveland, 1987. HMSO, 1988, pp. 99–107.

4 A vivid description of the atmosphere of intimidation and silencing of the community in Cleveland can be found in Campbell, Bea, Unofficial Secrets: Child Sexual Abuse–the Cleveland Case. Virago, 1988, pp. 194203.Google Scholar

5 Butler‐Sloss, ibid., pp. 164–166, 201.