Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T10:47:28.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Power—Tool of Social Analysis and Theological Concept: A Case of Confrontation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The tool of social analysis

Power has become a central concept in the analysis of political and social institutions. Its newly-found utility in part stems from the growth of Marxist analysis, which so many academics in the social sciences who are not necessarily Marxists have accepted to various degrees.

Until recently, the more common concept was authority—an idea that was once popular particularly amongst political theorists. Authority as an analytical tool has ceased to have pride of place because of its abstract nature and ideological overtones. The tendency today is to speak of power structures, not authority structures. Authority exists but it can be overthrown by another authority. The question is not so much the nature of the authorities but the fact that one is able to vanquish the other. How is the triumph achieved? The answer is simply that one authority has more power than the other and thus overcomes it. The concept of authority is still referred to and continues to be valuable, but the model of power is more useful, since it is that of a conflict in which sheer strength wins the day. Power implies opposition and final triumph. That is what politics is about. Some would see the whole of history as a power struggle. As Lenin has written: ‘Great questions in the life of nations are settled only by force.’

The extensive use now made of the concept of power has brought with it the problems of definition, and within the social sciences the issue virtually constitutes a subject in itself.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

REFERENCES

Adams, R.N. 1975 Energy and structure: A Theory of Social Power, University of Texas Press, Austin and London .Google Scholar
Beidelman, T.O. 1971 The Translation of Culture, Tavistock, London .Google Scholar
Lukes, S. 1974 Power: A Radical View, Macmillan, London .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. 1852 The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, in Karl Marx, Frederick Engels, Collected Works, Laurence and Wishart, London , Vol. 11.Google Scholar
Peabody, R.L. 1968 Authority’in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Macmillan Free Press, New York .Google Scholar
Pickering, W.S.F. 1984 Protestantism and Power: Some Sociological Observations’, Social Compass (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Richardson, A., (ed.) 1950 A Theological Word Book of the Bible, S.C.M. Press, London .Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1947 The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Oxford University Press, New York .Google Scholar
Wrong, D.. 1979 Power, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar