Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:19:14.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Not the Whole Story: Another Response to John Milbank's Theology and Social Theory: Part I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

John Daniels
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is the province of knowledge to narrate and the privilege of wisdom to listen. With apologies to Oliver Wendell Holmes

It is already ten years since John Milbank published Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. Its impact was immediately apparent, the journals Modern Theology and New Blackfriars dedicating entire numbers to discussing some of the many issues arising from it. For it is unquestionably a daunting achievement: a relatively simple thesis elaborated at considerable length and taking on in the process a whole range of authors from a variety of disciplines and across history. To do the book justice in a few words is almost impossible; but it surely remains the case that whatever one’s views of Milbank’s conclusions, it is difficult not to respect both the scholarship and ambition which it represents.

A number of the many issues raised in the course of the book have already been addressed by subsequent reviewers and authors. It might seem curious that there is still something left to be said fully a decade later; and yet there is so much meat contained in the book that it remains a banquet of inspiration and controversy in many ways. In this paper I wish to focus my engagement with Milbank’s ideas by considering his account of the work of Paul Ricoeur. Although he discusses Ricoeur only very briefly—a few pages (pp. 263-8) out of more than four hundred—I hope to show how dealing with this small part leads us to engage with a central element of Milbank’s thesis. Before embarking in earnest on this task, there are two points which need to be declared.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 82 , Issue 962 , April 2001 , pp. 188 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

Ayres, L., 1995, ‘Representation, theology and faith’ in Rethinking Metaphysics, eds Jones, L. G. & Fowl, S. E., pp. 23–46. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brueggeman, W., 1984, The Message of the Psalms. Minneapolis: Augsburg.Google Scholar
Daniels, J., 1997, ‘Religion, religious studies and the life‐world’, Scottish Journal of Religious Studies 18: 35–50.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W., 1979, Dilthey: Selected Writings, trans. & ed. Rickman, H. P.. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.‐G., 1989, Truth and Method, trans. Weinsheimer, J. & Marshall, D. G.. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1962, Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, J. & Robinson, E.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1966, ‘Conversation on a country path about thinking’ in Discourse on Thinking, trans. Anderson, J. M. & Freund, E. H., pp. 58–90. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1993a, ‘Letter on humanism’ in Basic Writings, ed. Farrell Krell, D., pp. 217–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1993b, ‘On the essence of truth’ in Basic Writings, ed. Farrell Krell, D., pp. 115–38. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kepnes, S.D., 1986, ‘Bridging the gap between understanding and explanation approaches to the study of religion’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 25: 504–12.10.2307/1385914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lash, N., 1992, ‘Not exactly politics or power’, Modern Theology 8: 354–64.10.1111/j.1468-0025.1992.tb00287.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeuw, G. van der, 1986, Religion in Essence and Manifestation, trans. Turner, J. E.. Princeton: University Press.10.1515/9781400858026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, G., 1992, ‘Christianity at the end of the story or the return of the master narrative’, Modern Theology 8: 365–84.10.1111/j.1468-0025.1992.tb00288.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, G., 1999, Telling God's Story: Bible, Church and Narrative Theology. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Lyon, D., 1992, ‘Against secular reason: Milbank on Augustine and postmodernism’, Crux 28 42–5.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A., 1985, Afer Virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A., 1988, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Milbank, J., 1990, Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milbank, J., 1997, The Word Made Strange: Theology, Language, Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Plato, , 1974, The Republic, trans. Tee, H.D.P.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1971, ‘The model of the text: meaningful action considered as text’, Social Research 38: 529–563.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1978a, ‘The hermeneutical function of distanciation’ in Exegesis, eds Antoine, G. et al, pp. 297–319. Pittsburgh: Pickwick Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1978b, The Rule Of Metaphor: trans. Czerny, R.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1981, ‘Phenomenology and hermeneutics’ in Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, trans. Thomson, J. B., pp. 101–28. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1984, Time and Narrative, Vol. I, trans. McLaughlin, K. & Pellauer, D.. London: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226713519.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1988, Time and Narrative, Vol. III, trans. Blarney, K. & Pellauer, D.. London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1992, Oneself as Another, trans. Blarney, K.. London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.H., 1993, ‘Transcendental sociology? A critique of John Milbank's Theology and Social Theory’, Scottish Journal of Theology, 46: 523–35.10.1017/S0036930600045282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, G., 1993, Judaism and Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schutz, A., 1962a, ‘On multiple realities’ in Collected Papers I: the Problem of Social Reality, pp. 207–59. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A., 1962b, Symbol reality and society’ in Collected Papers I: the Problem of Social Reality, pp. 287–356. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A., 1975, ‘Some structures of the life‐world’ in Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy, pp. 116–32. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-1700-8_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, R.A., 1990, ‘Misconceptions of the social sciences’, Zygon, 25 263–78.10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00792.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolowski, R., 1974, Husserlian Meditations. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar