No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2024
The rhetoric of ‘New World Order’ came to prominence in the period of glasnost and its dramatic denouement in the events of 1989, the fall of the Berlin Wall and the demise of communism. First coined by Gorbachev in 1986, the phrase New World Order became popular particularly with Western leaders, most notably in America and Britain, as a way of describing the future development of international relations after the end of the Cold War. At the same time as Fukuyama was declaring the ‘end of history’, Western politicians were announcing that a new kind of international order would be established with the demise of communism. In the Cold War era, so the argument ran, the USSR and her allies had blocked the enforcement of international legality through the UN, and had fermented regional conflicts and wars for her own interests. The New World Order would allow the development of a new peace where the freedoms taken for granted in the West might be seen to spread throughout the world without the great obstacle which the enemy of communism, and the superpower conflict, had previously represented. The United Nations could now at last take on the role prepared for it after the Second World War. America and her allies old and new would be able to ensure peace in the world.
1 Chomsky, Noam, ‘The US in the Gulf Crisis’, in Bresheeth, Haim and Yuval‐Davis, Nira (eds), The Gulf War and the New World Order, London, Zed Books, 1991, pp. 13–29Google Scholar.
2 Ibid.
3 Peffley, Mark and Hurwitz, Jon, ‘International Events and Foreign Policy Beliefs: Public Response to Changing Soviet‐US Relations’, The American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 36, No. 2, (May 1992), pp. 431–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Haim Bresheith, ‘The Search for the New Satan’ in Bresheeth and Niva Yuval‐Davis op. cit, pp. 243–256.
5 Henry Kissinger, Los Angeles Times, 16 August 1991.
6 Edward Said, ‘Empire in the Sand’, The Guardian Supplement, 12 January 1991, pp. 4–7.
7 Haim Bresheith, ‘The Search for the New Satan’ in Bresheeth and Niva Yuval‐Davis op. cit, pp. 243–256.
8 Said, Edward, Orientalism, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1985Google Scholar.
9 Ibid, pp. 1,2.
10 Bauman, Zygmunt, Intimations of Postmodernity, London, Routledge, 1992, p. 58Google Scholar.
11 Ibid, p. 59.
12 See Krasner, Stephen D., Structural Conflict. The Third World Against Global Liberalism, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1985Google Scholar, for an elaborate exposition of this proposition.
13 The Challenge to the South. Report of the South Commission, 1989, Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar.
14 Neumann, Iver B. and Welsh, Jennifer M., ‘The Other in European Self definition: an addendum to the Literature on international society. Review of International Studies 1991, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 See further Gibbon, Michael T., ‘The Ethic of Postmodernism’, Political Theory, Vol. 19, No. 1. February 1991, pp. 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Edward Said, Covering Islam. How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World, London, Routledge Kegan Paul, 1981, p. 164.
17 Steiner, George, Real Presences. Is there anything in what we say? London, Faber, 1989Google Scholar.
18 Taylor, Charles, Sources of the Self, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 515–518Google Scholar.
19 Steiner, Real Presences.
20 Ibid, p. 229.
21 Ford, J. Massyngbaerde, My Enemy is My Guest. Jesus and Violence in Luke, Maryknoll, Orbis, 1984Google Scholar, ch. 5.
22 Rowan Williams, ‘The Enemy in the New Testament’, a paper delivered at the Bradford Peace Studies Seminar, Bradford University, September 1992.
23 Ibid.
24 Hauerwas, Stanley, Against the Nations. War and Survival in a Liberal Society, Minnesota. Winston, 1985, p. 196Google Scholar.
25 ‘The Epistle to Diognetus’ in Early Christian Writings. The Apostolic Fathers, transl. Staniforth, Maxwell, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1968, pp. 169, 186Google Scholar.
26 Hauerwas, Stanley and Willimon, William H., Resident Aliens, Nashville, Abingdon, 1989, p. 42Google Scholar.
27 Hauerwas, Against the Nations. See also Taylor, Charles, ‘Conolly, Foucault, and Truth’, Political Theory, Vol. 13, No. 3, August 1985, pp. 377–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access