Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:29:30.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Insights into Matthew 27: 24–25

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Matthew’s gospel contains passages difficult for Jewish Christian relations for the final text, as we have it, seems to contain passages hostile to Jews which irritate Jewish Christian dialogue. History, however, may show these so called ‘anti Semitic’ passages of this gospel in a new, and quite different light.

The key text which today causes perhaps the greatest agony for those involved in Jewish Christian dialogue is the verse in the passion narrative of Matthew’s gospel: Mt. 27: 25 ‘His blood be upon us and upon our children’. For these commentators, the idiom ‘his blood be upon’ means ‘the responsibility of the death of Jesus is on our heads’. The action of Pilate washing his hands, seems to be drawing a contrast between Pilate and the people: Pilate seems to be declaring his innocence of the death of Jesus and says ‘My hands are clean of this man’s blood . . .’ By contrast the people seem to be accepting responsibility for the death of Jesus. Pilate is not guilty, but the ‘people’ are guilty. By this saying, they also incriminate their heirs in this guilt Some try to get round these ‘anti-semitisms’ (Matt. 23: 32-36, 7: 21-23, 8:11-12, 23: 33-46, 27: 25) by saying that ‘anti-semitic montages’ are only a secondary element introduced to the text added at a later, Greek, stage of the development of the gospels.

There is, of course, at present a fairly strong lobby, even among some Christians, who want to find ‘antisemitisms’ within the new Testament, for reasons which are sometimes distant from the academic interests of biblical criticism. It is necessary I think to examine these texts anew, both in the interest of the historical evidence available and in the interests of integrity within Jewish Christian relations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 Jesus and the Transformation of Judaism, Riches, J (DLT 1980) p. 68Google Scholar.

2 Sane sources indicate the vigour of the ‘Judaeo Christian’ Church. L'Archéologie Judeo‐chréienne by I Mancini OFM — Franciscan Press Jerusalem (Italian 1968, English 1970, French 1977). Theologie du Judéo‐christianisme — J Daniélou. Tournai 1958 (English 1976 DLT). The Archaeology of the New Testament, Jack Finnegan, (Princeton 1969). The House of St Peter at Capharnaum, V Corbo, (Franciscan Press. Jerusalem 1972). The Origins of Latin Christianity— J Daniélou (DLT 1977). Antioch and Rome— R E Brown and John P Meier — (G Chapman 1983).

3 T Jesus and the Transformation of Judaism p. 175.

4 Redating the New Testament, J A T Robinson. (Philadelphia 1976).

5 J Murphy O'Connor OP, (Lectures, École Biblique Jerusalem).

6 Exodus 12: 21–42.

7 Bible et Liturgie, J Daniélou pp 219–227.

8 The Biblical Foundation for Mission, D Senior and C Stuhlmueller SCM 1983 p. 245–6

9 The Language and Imagery of the Bible. Caird, G B (Duckworth 1980 (p. 117Google Scholar ff).

10 Jews and Christians in Antioch. Meeks, W and Wilken, R (Scholars Press 1978)Google Scholar.

11 The Community of the Beloved Disciple, Brown, R E. G Chapman 1979Google Scholar footnote on page 42.