Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:04:37.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

God's Flesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two years ago, under the pretext of reviewing a motley collection of books, I offered some reflections on the play dimension of life and spirituality. Now, two years later, a little sadder perhaps if no wiser, I want to take up my cudgels again, on a similar pretext. In 1970 I suggested that one of the crucial issues, often veiled by the more popular conservative-progressive polarity, is that of Tradition—a glance at the behaviour of children revealing a close relationship between tradition and play. In various ways Tradition is again the issue raised by the books under consideration this time.

Mauss’ General Theory of Magic, already quite a classic, but now for the first time translated into English, and Furst’s collection, Flesh of the Gods, demonstrate how far experience is socially determined—to such an extent, it appears, that sorcerers in some societies, even though they are aware of the sleight of hand and other tricks involved in their own practice, nevertheless remain convinced of the validity of the whole magical system within which they operate.

Flesh of the Gods is a collection of essays by American ‘ethno- botanists’ on the ritual use of drugs in tribal societies. There are some signs that ethnobotany is a bit of a tribal religion itself (there is a kind of credo by R. Gordon Wasson), but all the same much of the material presented here is quite interesting. One thing that emerges over and over again is that members of a drug-using culture spontaneously all have the same, and the expected, experiences, often with no prompting from the shamanistic leader; outsiders, however, taking identical doses of the drug in an identical setting, experience nothing of the sort.

One consequence of this is, of course, the possibility of building up utterly self-contained and invulnerable systems of self-delusion. Such seems to be Mauss’ verdict on magic, though he recognizes its social significance. Although there may be much talk about experiences, in fact there is a tendency towards ritualization and formalism, the emphasis being on form rather than content.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

page 38 note 1 ‘I'm Nobody—Who are You?’New Blackfriars, June 1970.

page 38 note 2 A General Theory of Magic, by Mauss, Marcel, trans. Brain, Robert. Routledge and Regan Paul. £2.25. 148 pp. 1972Google Scholar.

Flesh of the Gods, The Ritual Use of Hallucinogens, ed. by Furst, Peter T.. George Allen and Unwin. £5. 304 pp. 1972Google Scholar.

Christianity, an End to Magic, by Walker, John Baptist. Darton, Longman and Todd. £1.75. 118 pp. 1972.Google Scholar

Introduction to Indian Religious Thought, by Younger, Paul. Darton, Longman and Todd. £1.30. 142 pp. 1972Google Scholar.

Drugs, Mysticism and Make‐Believe, by Zaehner, R. C.. Collins. £1.90. 223 pp. 1972Google Scholar.

Pentecostalism, a Theological Viewpoint, by Gelpi, Donald, S.J. Paulist Press. £1.95. 234 pp. 1971Google Scholar.