Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T12:46:08.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dawkins is Dead: Long Live Evolution!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Conor Cunningham
Conor Cunningham*
Affiliation:
University Park Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What the late Stephen J Gould baptized ultra-Darwinism is anti-evolutionary. In so being, it leads to the undermining of science, rationality, and, lastly, to ethical nihilism, wherein any notion of humanism is impossible, and this for one simple reason – there is now no such thing as a human. In addition, we argue that ultra-Darwinism is a progeny of crass philosophical dualism, and this leads it to despise matter and the material world, even though, paradoxically, it espouses materialism. We conclude that the theory of evolution invalidates ultra-Darwinism.

Keywords

Ultra-DarwinismRichard Dawkinsselfish genesexistence problemarrival of the fittestmaterialismnaturalism
Type
Original Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 96 , Issue 1063 , May 2015 , pp. 269 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 The Dominican Council

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, L. R. (2007). The metaphysics of everyday life: An essay in practical realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, C. (2010). Darwin's pious idea: Why ultra-Darwinists and creationists both got it wrong. Grand Rapids, Illinois: Wm B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard, A Devil's Chaplain: Selected Essays by Richard Dawkins. London: Weidenfield and Nicholson, 2003.Google Scholar
Fanu, James Le. Why Us?: How Science Rediscovered the Mystery of Ourselves. New York: Pantheon Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1998). In critical condition: Polemical essays on cognitive science and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. (1997). Metaphysics and the origin of species. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, François, The Logic of Life: A History of Heredity, trans. Spillman, Betty (New York: Pantheon, 1973).Google Scholar
Metzinger, T. (2003). Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1551.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (2003). The last word. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pabst, A. (2010). Metaphysics: The creation of hierarchy. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans10.1093/0195149831.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl, and Eccles, J C, The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism. Berlin: Springer, 1977.10.1007/978-3-642-61891-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W V “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays (New York: Harper and Row, 1951).Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph, Truth and Tolerance: Christian Belief and World Religions (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2004), p. 178.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (1986). Taking Darwin seriously: A naturalistic approach to philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. & Wilson, E.O. (1993). The evolution of ethics. In Hutchinson, J.E. (Ed.), Religion and the Natural Sciences: The Range of Engagement (pp. 308–12). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Spaemann, R. (1985). ‘Funktionale religionsbegründung und religion’. In Koslowski, P. (Ed.), Die religiöse Dimension der Gesellschaft (pp. 9–29). Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Stroud, B. (2004). The charm of naturalism. In Caro, M. De and Macarthur, D. (Eds.), Naturalism in Question (pp. 21–35). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. The Empirical Stance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wallace, B. Alan. The Taboo of Subjectivity: Toward a New Science of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar