Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2024
Cruelty to children is not new, though no doubt we are an inventive enough species to come up with some new forms. It could be that some of us may be more disposed to it than others, but it seems safer to assume that we all share a capacity for cruelty. Such a capacity does not have to be exercised: cruelty can be understandable without being right. Some societies and some social situations may increase the likelihood of its occurring, but they neither excuse it nor explain it away.
But if cruelty itself is not new, new in our own time is its categorisation. When we talk of ‘child abuse’, we are putting forward views on both cruelty and children which in some ways are new, or at least newly accepted, and which incorporate our contemporary notions of how human beings should conduct themselves. This categorisation is crucial to any discussion, since it provides us with the basic forms which it must take, but it does incline us to treat the phenomenon of cruelty to children as especially characteristic of our own time. The broad range of cruelty from deprivation through violation to murder is fully evident, in England at least, from a succession of court cases and official inquiries, yet it still cannot be asserted with any certainty that child abuse is more common now than in the past. Evidence from the past is lacking precisely because our forebears did not share our categorisations (or our interest in statistics).
1 See Bell, Stuart M.P. When Salem Came to the Bom: The True Story of the Cleveland Child Abuse Crisis (London, Pan Books, 1988)Google Scholar. Also The Report of the Inquiry into Child Abuse in Cleveland (London, H.M.S.O., 1988)
2 The best known of the many works on this subject is still Aries, Philippe Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life (London, Jonathan Cape Ltd., 1962)Google Scholar.
3 Greer, Germaine Sex and Destiny: The Politics of Human Fertility (London, Seeker & Warburg, 1984) p.2Google Scholar.
4 Weinstein, Donald & Bell, Rudolph M. Saints & Society: The Two Worlds of Western Christendom 1000–1700 (Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1982)Google Scholar.