Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:16:33.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Beautiful Death of Thérèse of Lisieux and the Sufferings of the Tubercular Self

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For those familiar with the themes of traditional female spirituality in the Christian West, the dreary saga of Thérèse Martin and her death at the age of twenty-four in 1897 can only come as a grim reminder of the symbolic burden by which women have carried in their persons the dualistic designation of the spirit at war against the flesh. In the past the story of Thérèse has divided the Catholic faithful between traditional adherents of her cult, and those who opposed it in the name of a more virile postVatican II spirituality. More recently interest in her has extended beyond its traditional bounds. Monica Furlong’s biography, written from outside the Catholic community, provided a long overdue reappraisal of the young woman’s ambiguous character, from a frankly feminist perspective. Furlong concluded that the vitality and strength of determination typical of the young adult Thérèse has often been hidden from view by the sickly cult of weakness and submission that sprang up after her death.

Thérèse’s asceticism, which has come to be known as the Little Way, is an asceticism which reaches its apogee in her uncomplaining spirituality of suffering and death. By the time Thérèse died, a few months short of her twenty-fifth birthday, she had developed a spirituality of the body which stood over against a theology of considerable insight.The orthodoxy of her assertion of the gratuity of divine love, and of her conclusion that God cannot be pleased by heroic effort, but accepts the imperfect human being without question of merit, is expressed with all the clarity and conviction of so distant a figure from her in time, if not altogether in temperament, as Martin Luther. But the profundity of her basic theological insight is not the subject of this article.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 Monica, Furlong, Thérèse of Lisieux (London: Virago, 1987).Google Scholar

2 Daniel, Weinslein and Rudolph, Bell, Saints and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar

3 See: Caroline Walker, Bynum, Holy Feast, Holy Fast (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987Google Scholar, and Fragmentation and Redemption. Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religion (New York: Zone Books, 1991)Google Scholar. Also see: Beer, Frances, Women and Mystical Experience in the Middle Ages (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 1992.Google Scholar

4 Vita Sack ville‐West, The Eagle and the Dove (London, Sphere Books, 1988), p. 139.Google Scholar

5 Abbé, Combes (Ed.), The Collected letters of Thérèse of Lisieux (London: Sheed and Ward, 1949), p. 46.Google Scholar Elsewhere, Thérèse refers to soul and body as being related as “chick” is to “egg”, Ibid, p. 61.

6 John, Clarke (Ed), St. Thérèse of Théséux: Her Last Conversations (Washington, DC: ICS Publications, 1977), p. 280.Google Scholar

7 Bynum, , Holy Feast. Holy Fast, p. 258.Google Scholar

8 de Fray Francisco, Jesus, Relacion sencitla yfelde los Fiestas que el rey D. Felipe III nuestro Señor hizo (Vatican Library: Factico volume, 1627).Google Scholar

9 see: Alison, Weber, Teresa ofAvila. The Rhetoric of Femininity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar

10 Combes, p. 251.

11 Clarke, p. 160.

12 Ibid, p. 160.

13 Ibid, p. 166.

14 Ibid, p. 198.

15 Chris, Shilling, The Body and Social Theory (London: Sage Publications, 1993), p. 45.Google Scholar

16 Clarke, p. 171.

17 Ibid, p. 196.

18 Ibid, p. 185.

19 Philippe, Aries, The Hour of Our Death (London ; Penguin, 1983), p. 436.Google Scholar

20 Combes, p. 243.

21 Clarke, p. 144.

22 Susan, Sontag, Illness as Metaphor and Aids and its Metaphors (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991), p. 11.Google Scholar

23 Furlong, p. 132.

24 Sontag, p. 21.

25 Ibid, p. 36.

26 Ibid, p. 63.

27 Bryan, Turner and Georg, Stauth, Nietzsche's Dance (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988), p. 90.Google Scholar

28 Mike, Featherstone et al, The Body. Social Process and Cultural Theory (London: Sage Publications, 1991), p. 85.Google Scholar

29 Elaine, Scarry, The Body in Pain (Oxford, OUP, 1985), p. 29.Google Scholar

30 Ibid, p. 34.

31 Combes, p. 253.

32 Clarke, p. 206.

33 Ariès, p. 569.

34 Clarke, p. 269.

35 Ibid, p. 206.

36 Ibid, p. 206–7.

37 Ibid, p. 207.

38 Robert, Backhouse (ed). The Autobiography of Thérèse of Lisieux (London: Hodder and Staughton, 1994), p. 219.Google Scholar

39 Clarke, p. 207.

40 Ariès, p. 473.

41 Ibid. p. 473.

42 Ibid, p. 473.

43 Combes, p. 266.

44 Ibid. p. 266.

45 Clarke, p. 62.

46 Ibid. p. 271.

47 Ibid, p. 229.

48 Ibid, p. 224.

49 Simone, de Beauvoir, The Second Sex (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972), p 684.Google Scholar

50 See footnote 3, above.

51 Turner and Stauth, p. 114.

52 Friedrich, Nietzsche, The Twighlight of the idols/The Anti‐Christ (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968), p. 156.Google Scholar