Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:45:36.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Values in adolescent friendship networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2019

Martin Kindschi ,
Jan Cieciuch ,
Eldad Davidov ,
Alexander Ehlert ,
Heiko Rauhut ,
Claudio Juan Tessone  and
René Algesheimer
Martin Kindschi*
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Faculty of Business, Economics and Informatics, Institute of Business Administration, URPP Social Networks, Zurich, Canton Zurich, Switzerland (e-mail: [email protected])
Jan Cieciuch
Affiliation:
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Psychology, Warsaw, Mazovia Province, Poland, and University of Zurich, Faculty of Business, Economics and Informatics, Institute of Business Administration, URPP Social Networks, Zurich, Canton Zurich, Switzerland (e-mail: [email protected])
Eldad Davidov
Affiliation:
University of Cologne, Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology, Cologne, State North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, and University of Zurich, Department of Sociology, and URPP Social Networks, Zurich, Canton Zurich, Switzerland (e-mail: [email protected])
Alexander Ehlert
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Department of Sociology, Zurich, Canton Zurich, Switzerland (e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected])
Heiko Rauhut
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Faculty of Business, Economics and Informatics, Institute of Business Administration, URPP Social Networks, Zurich, Canton Zurich, Switzerland (e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected])
Claudio Juan Tessone
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Faculty of Business, Economics and Informatics, Institute of Business Administration, URPP Social Networks, Zurich, Canton Zurich, Switzerland (e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected])
René Algesheimer
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Faculty of Business, Economics and Informatics, Institute of Business Administration, URPP Social Networks, Zurich, Canton Zurich, Switzerland (e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected])
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Values—the motivational goals that define what is important to us—guide our decisions and actions every day. Their importance is established in a long line of research investigating their universality across countries and their evolution from childhood to adulthood. In adolescence, value structures are subject to substantial change, as life becomes increasingly social. Value change has thus far been understood to operate independently within each person. However, being embedded in various social systems, adolescents are constantly subject to social influence from peers. Thus, we introduce a framework investigating the emergence and evolution of value priorities in the dynamic context of friendship networks. Drawing on stochastic actor-oriented network models, we analyze 73 friendship networks of adolescents. Regarding the evolution of values, we find that adolescents’ value systems evolve in a continuous cycle of internal validation through the selection and enactment of goals—thereby experiencing both congruence and conflicts—and external validation through social comparison among their friends. Regarding the evolution of friendship networks, we find that demographics are more salient for the initiation of new friendships, whereas values are more relevant for the maintenance of existing friendships.

Keywords

value changefriendship network evolutionstochastic actor-oriented network modelsadolescent networks
Type
Original Article
Information
Network Science , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 498 - 522
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Algesheimer, R., Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2018). Key informant models for measuring group-level variables in small groups: Application to plural subject theory. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(2), 277–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthelemy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(21), 11149–11152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bardi, A., Buchanan, K. E., Goodwin, R., Slabu, L., & Robinson, M. (2014). Value stability and change during self-chosen life transitions: Self-selection versus socialization effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beierlein, C., Davidov, E., Cieciuch, J., & Rammstedt, B. (2014). The schwartz values short scale. An economic measurement tool for cross-cultural research. referat na 28th international congress of applied psychology, pary, francja.Google Scholar
Benenson, J. F., Stella, S., & Ferranti, A. (2015). Sex differences in human gregariousness. PeerJ, 3, 974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1971). The social construction of reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bilsky, W., & Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8(3), 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, P. (2015). Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle. Social Networks, 40, 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the friendship qualities scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1993). Popularity, friendship, and emotional adjustment during early adolescence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 93(60), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burk, W. J., Steglich, C. E. G., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1969). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. General Systems, 16, 69–85.Google Scholar
Checkley, M., & Steglich, C. (2007). Partners in power: job mobility and dynamic deal-making. European Management Review, 4(3), 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieciuch, J., Döring, A. K., & Harasimczuk, J. (2013). Measuring schwartz’s values in childhood: Multidimensional scaling across instruments and cultures. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(5), 625–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society: The social life of the teenager and its impact on education. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe, XVI–368.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. Sl. (2000). Social capital in the creation of human capital. In Knowledge and social capital (pp. 17–41). London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Nooy, W. (2002). The dynamics of artistic prestige. Poetics, 30(3), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eder, D., & Hallinan, M. T. (1978). Sex differences in children’s friendships. American Sociological Review 43(2), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellwardt, L., Labianca, G. J., & Wittek, R. (2012). Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work?: A social network perspective on workplace gossip. Social Networks, 34(2), 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmer, T., Boda, Z., & Stadtfeld, C. (2017). The co-evolution of emotional well-being with weak and strong friendship ties. Network Science, 5(3), 278–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1996). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In Seligman, C., Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The ontario symposium: The psychology of values, (vol. 8, pp. 215–251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, S. L. (1982). Social structural determinants of similarity among associates. American Sociological Review, 47(6), 797–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, L., & Hutte, H. A. (1954). An experimental investigation of the effect of unstable interpersonal relations in a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(4), 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (1982). What do we mean by ‘friend’? an inductive study. Social Networks, 3(4), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(395), 832–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (1992). Filling in the blanks: A theory of cognitive categories and the structure of social affiliation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friemel, T. N. (2012). Network dynamics of television use in school classes. Social Networks, 34(3), 346–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991). Giddens’ theory of structuration. a critical appreciation. In Bryant, C. , & Jary, D. (Eds.), Structuration theory: Past, present and future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gifford, R., & Gallagher, T. M. (1985). Sociability: Personality, social context, and physical setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, R. V. (2002). The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 107(5), 1143–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallinan, M. T. (1978). The process of friendship formation. Social Networks, 1(2), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallinan, M. T. (1979). Structural effects on children’s friendships and cliques. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42(1), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallinan, M. T., & Williams, R. A. (1989). Interracial friendship choices in secondary schools. American Sociological Review, 54(1), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanneke, S., & Xing, E. P. (2007). Discrete temporal models of social networks. In Statistical network analysis: Models, issues, and new directions (pp. 115–125). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 54(1), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haye, K., Robins, G., Mohr, P., & Wilson, C. (2013). Adolescents’ intake of junk food: Processes and mechanisms driving consumption similarities among friends. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 524–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, B., Rosen, D., & Aune, R. K. (2011). An analysis of friendship networks, social connectedness, homesickness, and satisfaction levels of international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmijn, M. (1995). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelvin, P. (1977). Predictability, power and vulnerability in interpersonal attraction. In Duck, S. (Ed.), Theory and Practice in Interpersonal Attraction (pp. 355–378). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, C. K. M. (1965). Values and value orientations in the theory of action. In Parsons, T., Shils, E. A., & Smelser, N. J. (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action: Theoretical foundations for the social sciences (pp. 388–433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Knecht, A., Snijders, T. A. B., Baerveldt, C., Steglich, C. E. G., & Raub, W. (2010). Friendship and delinquency: Selection and influence processes in early adolescence. Social Development, 19(3), 494–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackhardt, D., & Kilduff, M. (1999). Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, L. E. (1972). The influence of parents and peers during adolescence: The situation hypothesis revisited. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 34(1), 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laursen, B. P. (1993). Close friendships in adolescence. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. et al. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18(1), 18–66.Google Scholar
Levinson, D. J. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. Ballantine, NY: Random House Digital, Inc.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951). In, D. Cartwright (Eds.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Oxford, England: Harpers.Google Scholar
Lewis, K., Gonzalez, M., & Kaufman, J. (2012). Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(1), 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M., Prabhala, N. R., & Viswanathan, S. (2013). Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Science, 59(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F., & Helbing, D. (2011). How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(22), 9020–9025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1979). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeus, W. I. M., Oosterwegel, A., & Vollebergh, W. (2002). Parental and peer attachment and identity development in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 25(1), 93–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., Vartiainen, E., & De Vries, H. (2010). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32(1), 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K., & Merton, R. C. (1968). Social theory and social structure. 1230 Avenue of the Americas, New, York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Milardo, R. M. (1982). Friendship networks in developing relationships: Converging and diverging social environments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(3), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. (1956). Varieties of human value. Humanist, 16, 153.Google Scholar
Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. (1991). Behavioral negotiation theory-a framework for conceptualizing dyadic bargaining. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 147–190.Google Scholar
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. A. (1970). Developmentalism: A critical analysis. Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments, 167, 206.Google Scholar
Pearson, M., Steglich, C., & Snijders, T. (2006). Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections, 27(1), 47–63.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1967). The child’s conception of the world. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield Adams & Company.Google Scholar
Ripley, R. M. et al. (2011). Manual for rsiena (vol. 1). University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College.Google Scholar
Rivas-Drake, D., Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Schaefer, D. R., & Medina, M. (2017). Ethnic-racial identity and friendships in early adolescence. Child Development, 88(3), 710–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, G., & Pattison, P. (2001). Random graph models for temporal processes in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(1), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? the values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(3), 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schaefer, D. R., Kornienko, O., & Fox, A. M. (2011). Misery does not love company: Network selection mechanisms and depression homophily. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 764–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In Seligman, U. C., Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The Ontario Symposium: The Psychology of Values (vol. 8). Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., & Davidov, E. (2012). Refining the theory of basic human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2), 137–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2013). Culture matters: National value cultures, sources, and consequences. In Understanding culture (pp. 137–160). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., Van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanahan, M. J. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 667–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrum, W., Cheek, N. H. , Jr., & MacD, S. (1988). Friendship in school: Gender and racial homophily. Sociology of Education, 61(4), 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skimina, E., Cieciuch, J., Schwartz, S. H., Davidov, E., & Algesheimer, R. (2018). Testing the circular structure and importance hierarchy of value states in real-time behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 74, 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31(1), 361–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., & Baerveldt, C. (2003). A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27(2–3), 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solish, A., Perry, A., & Minnes, P. (2010). Participation of children with and without disabilities in social, recreational and leisure activities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23(3), 226–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A. B., & West, P. (2006). Applying siena: An illustrative analysis of the co-evolution of adolescents’ friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology, 2(1), 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A. B., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 329–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuma, N. B., & Hallinan, M. T. (1979). The effects of sex, race, and achievement on schoolchildren’s friendships. Social Forces, 57(4), 1265–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Bunt, G. G., Wittek, R. P. M., & de Klepper, M. C. (2005). The evolution of intra-organizational trust networks: The case of a german paper factory: An empirical test of six trust mechanisms. International Sociology, 20(3), 339–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Duijn, M. A. J., Zeggelink, E. P. H., Huisman, M., Stokman, F. N., & Wasseur, F. W. (2003). Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27(2–3), 153–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaquera, E., & Kao, G. (2008). Do you like me as much as i like you? friendship reciprocity and its effects on school outcomes among adolescents. Social Science Research, 37(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbrugge, L. M. (1977). The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56(2), 576–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wright, P. H. (1984). Self-referent motivation and the intrinsic quality of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1(1), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kindschi et al. supplementary material

Kindschi et al. supplementary material

Download Kindschi et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 900.7 KB