Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T10:19:37.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roles of egos’ and siblings’ perceptions of maternal favoritism in adult children’s depressive symptoms: A within-family network approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2019

J. Jill Suitor Open the ORCID record for J. Jill Suitor [Opens in a new window] ,
Megan Gilligan ,
Marissa Rurka  and
Yifei Hou
J. Jill Suitor*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected])
Megan Gilligan
Affiliation:
Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA (e-mail: [email protected])
Marissa Rurka
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected])
Yifei Hou
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected])
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is well documented that intergenerational ties play important roles in adults’ well-being. However, most studies focus on the impact of individuals’ own perceptions of their ties without considering whether family members’ assessments of these ties affect well-being. We address this question using data from 296 adult children nested within 95 later-life families in which all offspring were interviewed. Applying a mixed-method within-family approach, we explored whether the effect of perceived maternal favoritism on depressive symptoms was increased when siblings shared ego’s perceptions. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that ego’s own perceptions predicted depressive symptoms, but only among daughters. Siblings’ perceptions that egos were most close to mothers did not affect the well-being of daughters or sons. Qualitative analyses suggested that differential effects of perceived favoritism by gender reflected differences in the meaning sons and daughters associated with being favored children. Favored daughters were more likely than favored sons to report that they were emotional caregivers to their mothers; this pattern was especially strong when siblings reinforced egos’ perceptions of being “best suited” for this role. These findings emphasize the salience of egos’ own perceptions, relative to those of family network members, in shaping role embracement and psychological well-being, especially among women.

Keywords

family networkssocial influence and well-beingfamily relations and well-beingadult siblingsparental favoritismparental differential treatmentintergenerational relationswithin-family differencesmixed methods
Type
Research Article
Information
Network Science , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Special Issue Ego Networks , June 2020 , pp. 271 - 289
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models (Vol. 160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonucci, T. C. (2001). Social relations: An examination of social networks, social support. In Birren, J. E., & Schaie, K. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging, (pp. 427–453). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Antonucci, T. C., Birditt, K. S., & Webster, N. J. (2010). Social relations and mortality: A more nuanced approach. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(5), 649–659. doi:10.1177/1359105310368189Google ScholarPubMed
Ayalon, L., & Levkovich, I. (2018). A systematic review of research on social networks of older adults. Gerontologist, Advance Online Access. doi:10.1093/geront/gnx218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birditt, K. S., Miller, L. M., Fingerman, K. L., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2009). Tensions in the parent and adult child relationship: Links to solidarity and ambivalence. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 287–295. doi:10.1037/a0015196Google ScholarPubMed
Boll, T., Ferring, D., & Filipp, S. H. (2003). Perceived parental differential treatment in middle adulthood: Curvilinear relations with individuals’ experienced relationship quality to sibling and parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(4), 472–487. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.17.4.472Google ScholarPubMed
Borkan, J. (1999). Immersion/crystallization. In Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (Vol. 2, pp. 179–194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N. (2003). Computerized psychological assessment. In Graham, J. R., & Naglieri, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Assessment psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 141–163). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carli, L. L., & Bukatko, D. (2000). Gender, communication, and social influence: A developmental perspective. In Eckes, T., & Trautner, H. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 295–331). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Carr, D., & Springer, K. W. (2010). Advances in families and health research in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 743–761. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00728.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, W. C., & Feld, S. L. (2004). Principles relating social regard to size and density of personal networks, with applications to stigma. Social Networks, 26(4), 323–329. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.08.004Google Scholar
Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of motherhood: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from www2.jabsom.hawaii.edu/native/docs/tsudocs/Best_Practices_for_Mixed_Methods_Research_Aug2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
Davey, A., Tucker, C. J., Fingerman, K., & Savla, J. (2009). Within-family variability in representations of past relationships with parents. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(1), 125–136. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbn001Google Scholar
Dilworth-Anderson, P., Brummett, B. H., Goodwin, P., Williams, S. W., Williams, R. B., & Siegler, I. C. (2005). Effect of race on cultural justifications for caregiving. The Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 60, S257–S262. doi:10.1093/geronb/60.5.S257Google ScholarPubMed
Dilworth-Anderson, P., Goodwin, P. Y., & Williams, S. W. (2004). Can culture help explain the physical health effects of caregiving over time among African American caregivers? The Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59, S138–S145. doi:10.1093/geronb/59.3.S138Google ScholarPubMed
Eagly, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38(9), 971. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.38.9.971Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingerman, K. L., & Hay, E. L. (2002). Searching under the streetlight: Age biases in the personal and family relationships literature. Personal Relationships, 9(4), 415–433. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.09404Google Scholar
Friedkin, N. E. (2001). Norm formation in social influence networks. Social Networks, 23(3), 167–189. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00036-3Google Scholar
Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (2003). Attitude change, affect control, and expectation states in the formation of influence networks. In Thye, S. R. & Skvoretz, J. (Eds.), Power and status (pp. 1–29). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Gerber, J. P., Wheeler, L., & Suls, J. (2018). A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+years on. Psychological Bulletin , 144(2), 177–197. doi:10.1037/bul0000127Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, M., Suitor, J. J., Nam, S., Routh, B., Rurka, M., & Con, G. (2017). Family networks and psychological well-being in midlife. Social Sciences, 6(3), 94. doi:10.3390/socsci6030094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaney, C. A., & Israel, B. A. (2008). Social networks and social support. In Glanze, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 189–210). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, A. C., Whiteman, S. D., Fingerman, K. L., & Birditt, K. S. (2013). “Life still isn’t fair”: Parental differential treatment of young adult siblings. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(2), 438–452. doi:10.1111/jomf.12002Google ScholarPubMed
Kalmijn, M., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2011). Nonresponse of secondary respondents in multi-actor surveys: Determinants, consequences, and possible remedies. Journal of Family Issues, 32(6), 735–766. doi:10.1177/0192513X10390184Google Scholar
Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78(3), 458–467. doi:10.1093/jurban/78.3.458Google ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (1998). Effects of life course transitions on the quality of relationships between adult children and their parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 924–938. doi:10.2307/353635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehly, L. M., Ashida, S., Schafer, E. J., & Ludden, A. (2015). Caregiving networks—Using a network approach to identify missed opportunities. Journals of Gerontology, Series B , 70(1), 143–154. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbu111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, J. A., Goodnow, J. J., Woods, K., & Karantzas, G. (2002). Distributions of caregiving tasks among family members: The place of gender and availability. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 493. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.493Google ScholarPubMed
Leopold, T., Raab, M., & Engelhardt, H. (2014). The transition to parent care: Costs, commitments, and caregiver selection among children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 300–318. doi:10.1111/jomf.12099Google Scholar
Lincoln, K. D. (2008). Personality, negative interactions, and mental health. Social Service Review, 82(2), 223–252. doi:10.1086/589462Google ScholarPubMed
Lively, K. J., Steelman, L. C., & Powell, B. (2010). Equity, emotion, and household division of labor response. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(4), 358–379. doi:10.1177/0190272510389012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E., & Baird, B. M. (2006). Global self-assessment. In Eid, M., & Diener, E. (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 29–42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. (2002). Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Social Networks, 24(2), 407–422. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00016-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(1), 127–151. doi:10.1177/0049124193022001006Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C., & Krueger, R. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 224–239). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Peng, S., Suitor, J. J., & Gilligan, M. (2018). The long arm of maternal differential treatment: Effects of recalled and current favoritism on adult children’s psychological well-being. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(6), 1123–1132. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbw105Google Scholar
Peterson, J. C., Czajkowski, S., Charlson, M. E., Link, A. R., Wells, M. T., Isen, A. M., … Jobe, J. B. (2013). Translating basic behavioral and social science research to clinical application: The evolve mixed methods approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(2), 217–230. doi:10.1037/a0029909Google ScholarPubMed
Pillemer, K., & Gilligan, M. (2018). Translating basic research on the aging family to caregiving intervention: The case of within-family differences. Innovation in Aging, 2(1), 1–11. doi:10.1093/geroni/igx035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillemer, K., & Suitor, J. J. (2006). Making choices: A within-family study of caregiver selection. The Gerontologist, 46(4), 439–448. doi:10.1093/geront/46.4.439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillemer, K., & Suitor, J. J. (2014). Who provides care? A prospective study of caregiving among adult siblings. The Gerontologist, 54(4), 589–598. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillemer, K., Suitor, J. J., Pardo, S., & Henderson, C. (2010). Mothers’ differentiation and depressive symptoms among adult children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(2), 333–345. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00703.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2005). Ethnic differences in stressors, resources, and psychological outcomes of family caregiving: A meta-analysis. The Gerontologist , 45, 90–106. doi:10.1093/geront/45.1.90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polenick, C. A., DePasquale, N., Eggebeen, D. J., Zarit, S. H., & Fingerman, K. L. (2016). Relationship quality between older fathers and middle-aged children: Associations with both parties’ subjective well-being. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(7), 1203–1213. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbw094Google Scholar
Robins, R. W., & John, O. P. (1997). The quest for self-insight: Theory and research on accuracy and bias in self-perception. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J. A., & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 649–679). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1984). Components of depressed mood in married men and women—The center for epidemiologic studies depression scale. American Journal of Epidemiology, 119(6), 997–1004. doi:119/6/997/84379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, A. S., & Rossi, P. H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent–child relations across the life course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Salovey, P. (Ed.). (1991). The psychology of jealousy and envy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, M. H. (2011). Health and network centrality in a continuing care retirement community. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(6), 795–803, doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr112Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child–parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology , 103, 429–460. doi:10.1086/231213Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1964). Conflict and the web of group-affiliation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Suitor, J. J. & Gilligan, M. (In press). Applying mixed-method designs to the study of family relations. In Adamson, K., Few-Demo, A., Proulx, C., & Roy, K. (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methodologies. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Suitor, J. J., Gilligan, M., Johnson, K., & Pillemer, K. (2014). Caregiving, perceptions of maternal favoritism, and tension among siblings. The Gerontologist, 54(4), 580–588. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt065Google ScholarPubMed
Suitor, J. J., Gilligan, M., Peng, S., Jung, J. H., & Pillemer, K. (2017a). Role of perceived maternal favoritism and disfavoritism in adult children’s psychological well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(6), 1054–1066. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbv089Google ScholarPubMed
Suitor, J. J., Gilligan, M., Peng, S., & Rurka, M. (2018b). How much can be expected of one child? Consequences of multiplexity of mothers’ support preferences on adult children’s psychological well-being. In Alwin, D. F.. Felmlee, D. H., & Kreager, D. A. (Eds.), Social networks and the life course (pp. 263–281). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Suitor, J. J., Gilligan, M., & Pillemer, K. (2013). The role of violated caregiver preferences in psychological well-being when older mothers need assistance. The Gerontologist, 53(3), 388–396. doi:10.1093/geront/gns084CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suitor, J. J., Gilligan, M., & Pillemer, K. (2015). Stability, change, and complexity in later-life families. In George, L. K., & Ferraro, K. F. (Eds.). Handbook of aging and the social sciences (8th ed., pp. 205–226). New York: Elsevier Academic.Google Scholar
Suitor, J. J., Gilligan, M., Pillemer, K., Fingerman, K. L., Kim, K., Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V. L. (2017b). Applying within-family differences approaches to enhance understanding of the complexity of intergenerational relations. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(1), 40–53. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx037Google ScholarPubMed
Suitor, J. J., Gilligan, M., Rurka, M., Peng, S., Meyer, J., & Pillemer, K. (2018a). Accuracy of adult children’s perceptions of mothers’ caregiver preferences. The Gerontologist , 59(3), 528–537. doi:10.1093/geront/gny064Google Scholar
Suitor, J. J., & Pillemer, K. (2006). Choosing daughters: Exploring why mothers favor adult daughters over sons. Sociological Perspectives, 49(2), 139–161. doi:10.1525/sop.2006.49.2.139Google Scholar
Suitor, J. J., Sechrist, J., Plikuhn, M., Pardo, S. T., Gilligan, M., & Pillemer, K. (2009). The role of perceived maternal favoritism in sibling relations in midlife. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(4), 1026–1038. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00650.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suitor, J. J., Sechrist, J., Steinhour, M., & Pillemer, K. (2006). “I’m sure she chose me!” Accuracy of children’s reports of mothers’ favoritism in later life families. Family Relations, 55(5), 526–538. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00423.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2000). A selective history of classic and neo-social comparison theory. In Handbook of social comparison (pp. 3–19). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. J., Chatters, L. M., & Jackson, J. S. (1993). A profile of familial relations among three-generation black families. Family Relations, 42, 332–341. doi:10.2307/585563Google Scholar
Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161. doi:10.1177/0022146510395592Google ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P. A., Liu, H., & Umberson, D. (2017). Family relationships and well-being. Innovation in Aging, 1(3). doi:10.1093/geroni/igx025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umberson, D. (1992). Relationships between adult children and their parents: Psychological consequences for both generations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(3), 664–674. www.jstor.org/stable/353252Google Scholar
Umberson, D., & Karas Montez, J. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, S54–S66. doi:10.1177/0022146510383501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vazire, S. (2006). Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 472–481. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.003Google Scholar
Walen, H. R., & Lachman, M. E. (2000). Social support and strain from partner, family, and friends: Costs and benefits for men and women in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 5–30. doi:10.1177/0265407500171001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. L. (1993). Psychoanalytic theory and the sociology of gender. In England, P. (Ed.), Theory on gender: Feminism on theory (pp. 131–149). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Wright, J. D., & Marsden, P. V. (2010). Survey research and social science: History, current practice, and future prospects. In Wright, J., & Marsden, P. (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 3–26). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group.Google Scholar