Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:46:59.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stratigraphy of the upper Vijlen Member (Gulpen Formation; Maastrichtian) in northeast Belgium, the southeast Netherlands and the Aachen area (Germany), with special reference to belemnitellid cephalopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2014

N. Keutgen ,
J.W.M. Jagt ,
P.J. Felder  and
E.A. Jagt-Yazykova
N. Keutgen
Affiliation:
Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, de Bosquetplein 6–7, NL-6211 KJ Maastricht, the Netherlands Uniwersytet Techniczno-Przyrodniczy Bydgoszcz, ul. Bernardynska 6/8, PL-85 029 Bydgoszcz, Poland
J.W.M. Jagt*
Affiliation:
Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, de Bosquetplein 6–7, NL-6211 KJ Maastricht, the Netherlands
P.J. Felder
Affiliation:
Deceased
E.A. Jagt-Yazykova
Affiliation:
Uniwersytet Opolski, Wydzial Przyrodniczo-Techniczny, Katedra Biosystematyki, ul. Oleska 22, PL- 45 052 Opole, Poland
*
*Email: [email protected]..

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent studies have demonstrated the complex depositional history of the Vijlen Member (Gulpen Formation) in the Maastricht-Aachen-Liège area, on which synsedimentary tectonics had a profound impact, in conjunction with regressive and transgressive episodes, the oldest portion of this member being preserved only locally, within channel-like structures. Our reinterpretation of the Vijlen Member, here presented, is at variance with current belemnite stratigraphy. To account for incongruities, reworking of belemnites is here proposed as a typical feature during Vijlen Member deposition. A renewed study of belemnites on the basis of these new data suggests that intervals 4–6 of the Vijlen Member are of late Maastrichtian age. With respect to the mean values of populations of Belemnitella junior Nowak and Belemnitella Iwowensis Naidin, Vijlen Member intervals 4–5 are coeval with the Spyridoceramus tegulatus/Belemnitella junior Zone (sensu germanico), whereas at least the upper portion of interval 6 is correlatable with the basal Tenuipteria argentea/Belemnitella junior Zone (sensu germanico). Although reworking of belemnites appears to have been a common feature, this cannot be properly substantiated without additional geochemical analyses of individual guards. For this reason, we refrain from proposing a biostratigraphic zonation of the Vijlen Member based on belemnites. Alternatively, scaphitid ammonites might be used to subdivide this member, because species such as Acanthoscaphites (Acanthoscaphites) tridens (Kner), A. (Euroscaphites) varians blaszkiewiczi Jagt, Kennedy & Machalski, Hoploscaphites constrictus (J. Sowerby), H. tenuistriatus (Kner) and Hoploscaphites sp. have been recorded. The last-named taxon represents an interspecies hybrid between the North American Jeletzkytes dorfi Landman & Waage and an unidentified subspecies of the endemic European lineage of H. constrictus, allowing correlation of the lower portion of Vijlen Member interval 6 with the Hoploscaphites birkelundae Zone of the United States Western Interior.

Keywords

ColeoideaBelemnitellidaeVijlen MemberMaastrichtian type areaNetherlandsBelgiumGermanycorrelation
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , September 2010 , pp. 109 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2013

References

Albers, H.-J. & Felder, W.M., 1979. Litho-, Biostratigraphie und Palökologie der Oberkreide und des Alttertiärs (Präobersanton-Dan/Paläozän) von Aachen-Südlimburg (Niederlande, Deutschland, Belgien. In: Wiedmann, J. (ed.): Aspekte der Kreide Europas. International Union of Geological Sciences A6: 47–84.Google Scholar
Arkhangelsky, A.D., 1912. Verkhnemelovyya otlozheniya vostoka evropejskoy rossii. Materialy dlja Geologii Rossii 25: xxv + 1–631, 10 pls.Google Scholar
Bayle, E., 1878. Fossils principaux der terrains de la France. Explication de la Carte Géologique de la France 4(1), Atlas, 79 plates.Google Scholar
Birkelund, T., 1957. Upper Cretaceous belemnites from Denmark. Biologiske Skrifter fra det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 9: 1–69, 6 pls.Google Scholar
Breddin, H., Brühl, H. & Dieler, H., 1963. Das Blatt Aachen-Nordwest der praktisch-geologischen Grundkarte 1: 50 000 des Aachener Stadtgebietes. Geologische Mitteilungen 1: 251–428.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1994. Upper Cretaceous belemnites from Lonzée (SE Belgium) and their stratigraphical significance. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 64: 151–158, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1995. Belemnitella from the Upper Campanian and Lower Maastrichtian Chalk of Norfolk, England. Special Papers in Palaeontology 51: 1–84, 9 pls.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1996. A review of the Upper Campanian and Maastrichtian belemnite biostratigraphy of Europe. Cretaceous Research 17: 751–766.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1997. The Late Cretaceous belemnite family Belemnitellidae: taxonomy and evolutionary history. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 44: 59–88, 2 pls.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1999. Upper Campanian and Lower Maastrichtian belemnites from the Mons Basin, Belgium. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 69: 97–131, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., Schmid, F. & Schulz, M.-G., 2004. Belemnitella from the Upper Maastrichtian of Hemmoor, Northwest Germany. Geologisches Jahrbuch A157: 23–67, 3 pls.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A.D., 1840–1842. Paléontologie française; Terrains Crétacés, 1. Céphalopodes. Paris (Masson): 1–120 (1840); 121-430 (1841); 431-662 (1842), 148 + 3 pls.Google Scholar
Doyle, P. & Macdonald, D.I.M, 1993. Belemnite battlefields. Lethaia 26: 65–80.Google Scholar
Ebensberger, H., 1962. Stratigraphische und mikropaläontologische Untersuchungen in der Aachener Oberkreide, besonders der Maastricht-Stufe. Palaeontographica A120: ii +1–120, 12 pls.Google Scholar
Elorza, J., Garcia-Garmilla, F., & Jagt, J.W.M, 1997. Diagenesis-related differences in isotopic and elemental composition of late Campanian and early Maastrichtian inoceramids and belemnites from NE Belgium: palaeoenvironmental implications. Geologie en Mijnbouw 75: 349–360.Google Scholar
Felder, P.J., 1997. The Vijlen Chalk Member (Maastrichtian, Late Cretaceous) in the Meuse-Rhine Euregion. Annales de la Société géologique de Belgique 119 (1996): 119–133.Google Scholar
Felder, P.J., 2001. Bioklasten-stratigrafie of ecozonatie voor het krijt (sic) (Santoniaan-Campaniaan-Maastrichtiaan) van Zuid-Limburg en oostelijk België. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Belgium 47: 1–141.Google Scholar
Felder, P.J. & Bless, M.J.M, 1994. The Vijlen Chalk (early Early to early Late Maastrichtian) in its type area around Vijlen and Mamelis (southern Limburg, The Netherlands). Annales de la Société géologique de Belgique 116: 61–85.Google Scholar
Felder, W.M., 1975a. Lithostratigraphische Gliederung der Oberen Kreide in Süd-Limburg (Niederlande) und den Nachbargebieten. Erster Teil: Der Raum westlich der Maas, Typusgebiet des ‘Maastricht’. Publicaties van het Natuurhistorisch Genootschap in Limburg 24(1974): 1–43.Google Scholar
Felder, W.M., 1975b. Lithostratigrafie van het Boven-Krijt en het Dano-Montien in Zuid-Limburg en het aangrenzende gebied. In: Zagwijn, W.H. & Van Staalduinen, C.J. (eds): Toelichting bij geologische overzichtskaarten van Nederland. Haarlem (Rijks Geologische Dienst): 63–72.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, A., 1826–1844. Petrefacta Germaniae tam ea, quae in museo universitatis regiae Borussicae Fridericiae Wilhelmiae Rhenanae servantur quam alia quae cunque in museis hoeninghausiano, muensteriano aliisque extant, iconibus et descriptionibus illustrata. Abbildungen und Beschreibung der Petrefacten Deutschlands und der angränzenden Länder, unter Mitwirkung des Herrn Grafen Georg zu Münster. Düsseldorf (Arnz & Co.), viii + 1–76, pls 1-25 (1826); 77-164, pls 26-50 (1829); 165-240, pls 51-71 (1831); 241-252 (1833); 1-68, pls 72-96 (1833); 69-140, pls 97-121 (1836); 141-224, pls 122-146 (1840); 225-312, pls 147-165 (1837); iv + 1-128, pls 166-200 (1844).Google Scholar
Hiltermann, H. & Koch, W., 1950: Taxonomie und Vertikalverbreitung von Bolivinoides-Arten im Senon Nordwestdeutschlands. Geologisches Jahrbuch 64: 595–632.Google Scholar
Hofker, J., 1966. Maestrichtian, Danian and Paleocene Foraminifera. The Foraminifera of the type Maestrichtian in South Limburg, Netherlands, together with the Foraminifera of the underlying Gulpen Chalk and the overlying calcareous sediments; the Foraminifera of the Dansk Chalk and the overlying Greensands and Clays as found in Denmark. Palaeontographica, Supplement A10: ii + 1–376, 86 pls.Google Scholar
Jäger, M., 2004. Serpulidae und Spirorbidae (Polychaeta sedentaria) (sic) aus dem Campan und Maastricht von Norddeutschland, den Niederlanden, Belgien und angrenzenden Gebieten. Geologisches Jahrbuch A157: 121–249, 10 pls.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M, 1999a. Late Cretaceous-Early Palaeogene echinoderms and the K/T boundary in the southeast Netherlands and northeast Belgium – Part 1. Introduction and stratigraphy. Scripta Geologica 116: 1–57.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M, 1999b. Late Cretaceous-Early Palaeogene echinoderms and the K/T boundary in the southeast Netherlands and northeast Belgium – Part 2. Crinoids. Scripta Geologica 116: 59–255.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M, 2005. Stratigraphic ranges of mosasaurs in Belgium and the Netherlands (Late Cretaceous) and cephalopod-based correlations with North America. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 84: 283–301.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M, Deckers, M., Dhondt, A.V., Dortangs, R.W., Felder, P.J., Felder, W.M., Jäger, M., Keutgen, N., Kuypers, M., Michels, G., Reynders, J., Simon, E., Van der Ham, R., Van Knippenberg, P. & Van Neer, R., 1995. Preliminary report of field work at Altembroeck (NE Belgium, early Maastrichtian) by the Working Group Beutenaken/Vijlen Members. Service Géologique de Belgique, Professional Paper 1995/1 (276): 1–20.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M, Felder, P.J. & Meessen, J.P.M.Th., 1987. Het Boven-Campanien in Zuid-Limburg (Nederland) en Noordoost België. Natuurhistorisch Maandblad 76: 94–110.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M & Kennedy, W.J., 1989. Acanthoscaphites varians (Łopuski, 1911) (Ammonoidea) from the Upper Maastrichtian of Haccourt, NE Belgium. Geologie en Mijnbouw 68: 237–240.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M, Kennedy, W.J. & Burnett, J., 1992. Acanthoscaphites tridens (Kner, 1848) (Ammonoidea) from the Vijlen Member (Lower Maastrichtian) of Gulpen, Limburg, the Netherlands. Geologie en Mijnbouw 71: 15–21.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M, Kennedy, W.J. & Machalski, M., 1999. Giant scaphitid ammonites from the Maastrichtian of Europe. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 69: 133–154, 8 pls.Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J.A., 1948. Zur Kenntnis der Oberkreide der Dnjepr-Donetz-Senke und zum Vergleich der russischen borealen Oberkreide mit derjenigen Polens und Nordwesteuropas. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 70: 583–602.Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J.A., 1949. Über den taxonomischen Wert einiger morphologischer Elemente des Rostrums der belemnitellenartigen Formen (Familie Belemnitellidae Pavlow, 1913), sowie über die Gattung Belemnella (Nowak, 1913, subg.) Jeletzky, 1941, ihre Phylogenie und einige Vertreter. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, B9: 257–287.Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J.A., 1951a. The place of the Trimingham and Norwich Chalk in the Campanian-Maestrichtian succession. Geological Magazine 88: 197–208.Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J.A., 1951b. Die Stratigraphie und Belemnitenfauna des Obercampan und Maastricht Westfalens, Nordwestdeutschlands und Dänemarks, sowie einige allgemeine Gliederungs-Probleme der jüngeren borealen Oberkreide Eurasiens. Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch 1: 1–142, 7 pls.Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J.A., 1965. Taxonomy and phylogeny of fossil Coleoidea (= Dibranchiata). Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 65-2 (42): 72–76.Google Scholar
Keutgen, N., 1996. Biostratigraphie, Paläoökologie und Invertebratenfauna des Untermaastricht von Aachen (Westdeutschland) und angrenzenden Gebieten (Südostniederlande, Nordostbelgien). Aachen (Shaker Verlag): iv + 213 pp.Google Scholar
Keutgen, N., 1997. Belemnella (Belemnella) cf. praearkhangelskii Naidin, 1964 from the Vijlen Member at Altembroeck (NE Belgium, Early Maastrichtian). Geologie en Mijnbouw 75: 341–347.Google Scholar
Keutgen, N. & Jagt, J.W.M, 1999. Late Campanian belemnite faunas from Liège-Limburg (NE Belgium, SE Netherlands). Geological Survey of Belgium, Professional Paper 1998/2 (287): 1–31.Google Scholar
Keutgen, N. & Jagt, J.W.M, 2009. Correlation of Maastrichtian strata in the southeast Netherlands and adjacent regions, northern Germany, northern Spain and the USA. Byulleten' Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelej Prirody, Otdel Geologicheskii 84: 71–77.Google Scholar
Keutgen, N. & Van der Tuuk, L.A., 1991. Belemnites from the Lower Maastrichtian of Limburg, Aachen and Liège. Mededelingen van de Rijks Geologische Dienst 44 (1990): 1–39, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Kin, A., 2010. Early Maastrichtian ammonites and nautiloids from Hrebenne, southeast Poland, and phenotypic plasticity of Acanthoscaphites tridens (Kner, 1848). Cretaceous Research 31: 27–60.Google Scholar
Kner, R., 1848. Versteinerungen des Kreidemergels von Lemberg und seiner Umgebung. W. Haidinger's naturwissenschaftliche Abhandlungen 3: 1–42, 5 pls.Google Scholar
Koch, W., 1977. Stratigraphie der Oberkreide in Nordwestdeutschland (Pompeckjsche Schwelle), Teil 2: Biostratigraphie der Oberkreide und Taxonomie von Foraminiferen. Geologisches Jahrbuch A38: 11–123.Google Scholar
Kongiel, R., 1962. On belemnites from Maastrichtian, Campanian and Santonian sediments in the Middle Vistula Valley (Central Poland). Prace Muzeum Ziemi 5: 3–140, 21 pls.Google Scholar
Lambert, J., 1911. Description des Échinides crétacés de la Belgique principalement de ceux conservés au Musée royal de Bruxelles – II. Échinides de l'étage Sénonien. Mémoires du Musée royal d'Histoire naturelle de Belgique 4 (1910): 1–78, 3 pls.Google Scholar
Landman, N.H. & Cobban, W.A., 2003. Ammonites from the Upper Part of the Pierre Shale and Fox Hills Formation of Colorado. American Museum Novitates 3388: 1–45.Google Scholar
Landman, N.H. & Waage, K.M., 1993. Scaphitid ammonites of the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Fox Hills Formation in South Dakota and Wyoming. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 215: 1–257.Google Scholar
Machalski, M., 2005. Late Maastrichtian and earliest Danian scaphitid ammonites from central Europe: taxonomy, evolution, and extinction. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 50: 653–696.Google Scholar
Machalski, M., Jagt, J.W.M, Heinberg, C., Landman, N.H. & Håkansson, E., 2009. Danskie amonity – obecny stan wiedzy i perspektywy badań. Przegląd Geologiczny 57: 486–493.Google Scholar
Machalski, M., Jagt, J.W.M, Landman, N.H. & Motchurova-Dekova, N., 2007. The highest records of North American scaphitid ammonites in the European Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) and their stratigraphic implications. Acta Geologica Polonica 57: 169–185.Google Scholar
Marsson, T., 1878. Die Foraminiferen der weissen Schreibkreide der Insel Rügen. Mittheilungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Neu-Vorpommern und Rügen in Greifswald 10: 115–196, 5 pls.Google Scholar
Morton, S.G., 1834. Synopsis of the organic remains of the Cretaceous Group of the United States. Philadelphia: Key and Biddle, 88 pp.Google Scholar
Naidin, D.P., 1952. Verkhnemelovye belemnity zapadnoj Ukrainy. Trudy Moskovskogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instituta imemi S. Ordzhinikidze 27: 1–126, 21 pls.Google Scholar
Naidin, D.P., 1964. Verkhnemelovye belemnitelly i belemnelly Russkoj platformy i nekotorykh sopredel'nykh oblastej. Byulleten' Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelej Prirody, Otdel Geologicheskii 39: 85–97, 2 pls.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, B., 2003. Late Campanian and Early Maastrichtian ammonites from the white chalk of Kronsmoor (northern Germany) – taxonomy and stratigraphy. Acta Geologica Polonica 53: 257–281, 7 pls.Google Scholar
Nieto, L.M., Ruiz-Ortiz, P.A., Rey, J., & Benito, M.I., 2008. Strontium-isotope stratigraphy as a constraint on the age of condensed levels: examples from the Jurassic of the Subbetic Zone (southern Spain). Sedimentology 55: 1–29.Google Scholar
Nowak, J., 1913. Untersuchungen über die Cephalopoden der oberen Kreide in Polen. III. Teil. Bulletin international de l'Académie des Sciences de Cracovie, Classe des Sciences mathématiques et naturelles, B1913: 335–415, pls 40-45.Google Scholar
Odin, G.S. & Lamaurelle, M.A., 2001. The global Campanian-Maastrichtian stage boundary. Episodes 24 (4): 229–238.Google Scholar
Ogg, J.G., Ogg, G. & Gradstein, F.M., 2008. The Concise Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 184 pp.Google Scholar
Pavlow, A.P., 1914. Yurskie i nizhnemelovye Cephalopoda severnoi Sibiri. Imperatovski Akademii Nauk, Zapiski Seriia 8, Fizino-mathematicheskii Otdel 21 (1913): 1–68, 18 pls.Google Scholar
Robaszynski, F., Bless, M.J.M, Felder, P.J., Foucher, J.-C., Legoux, O., Manivit, H., Meessen, J.P.M.T. & Van der Tuuk, L.A., 1985. The Campanian-Maastrichtian boundary in the chalky facies close to the type-Maastrichtian area. Bulletin des Centres de Recherches et d'Exploration-Production d'Elf-Aquitaine 9: 1–113, 22 pls.Google Scholar
Robaszynski, F., Dhondt, A.V. & Jagt, J.W.M, 2002. Cretaceous lithostratigraphic units (Belgium). In: Bultynck, P. & Dejonghe, L. (eds): Guide to a revised lithostratigraphic scale of Belgium. Geologica Belgica 4(2001): 121–134.Google Scholar
Roemer, F.A., 1840–1841. Die Versteinerungen des norddeutschen Kreidegebirges. Hannover (Hahn'sche Hofbuchhandlung): 1–48 (1840), 49-145 (1841).Google Scholar
Schulz, M.-G., 1979. Morphometrisch-variationsstatistische Untersuchungen zur Phylogenie der Belemniten-Gattung Belemnella im Untermaastricht NW-Europas. Geologisches Jahrbuch A47: 3–157, 12 pls.Google Scholar
Schulz, M.-G., 1982. Erster Nachweis der Belemnitengattung Belemnitella (B. pulchra n. sp.) im mittleren Untermaastricht NW-Deutschlands. Geologisches Jahrbuch A61: 279–293, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Schulz, M.-G., 1985. Die Evolution der Echiniden-Gattung Galerites im Campan und Maastricht Norddeutschlands. Geologisches Jahrbuch A80: 3–93, 15 pls.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J., 1817. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or coloured figures and descriptions of those remains of testaceous animals or shells, which have been preserved at various times and depths in the area, 2. London (The author): pls 151-186.Google Scholar
Van der Ham, R. & Van Birgelen, M., 1992. Zeeëgels uit het Maastrichtien van de Schneeberg en omgeving (Aken, Duitsland). Natuurhistorisch Maandblad 81: 139–153, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, N., Van Simaeys, S., Steurbaut, E., Jagt, J.W.M & Felder, P.J., 2004. Stratigraphic architecture of the Upper Cretaceous and Cenozoic along the southern border of the North Sea Basin in Belgium. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 83: 155–171.Google Scholar
Visser, A.M., 1951. Monograph on the foraminifera of the type-locality of the Maestrichtian (South-Limburg, the Netherlands). Leidse Geologische Mededelingen 16 (1950): 197–359, 11 pls.Google Scholar
Von Hagenow, F., 1840. Monographie der Rügen'schen Kreideversteinerungen. Abtheilung II. Radiarien und Annulaten, nebst Nachträgen zur I. Abtheilung. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaktenkunde 1840: 621–672, pl. 9.Google Scholar
Von Schlotheim, E.F., 1813. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen in geognostischer Hinsicht. In: Leonhard, C.C. (ed.): Leonhard's Taschenbuch für die gesammte Mineralogie mit Hinsicht auf die neuesten Entdeckungen (1)7: 1–134, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Von Zittel, K.A., 1895. Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie). München/Leipzig (R. Oldenburg): vii + 971 pp.Google Scholar