Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:25:15.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial prediction of the variability of Early Pleistocene subsurface sediments in the Netherlands - Part 2: Geochemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

D.J. Huisman ,
J.P. Weijers ,
L. Dijkshoorn  and
A. Veldkamp
D.J. Huisman
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO (TNO-NITG), P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA UTRECHT, the Netherlands; corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected]
J.P. Weijers
Affiliation:
Heerlen Municipality, P.O. Box 36, 6430 AA HOENSBROEK, the Netherlands
L. Dijkshoorn
Affiliation:
TAUW B.V., P.O. Box 594, 6130 AN SITTARD, the Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected]
A. Veldkamp
Affiliation:
Wageningen Agricultural University, Laboratory for Soil Science and Geology, P.O. Box 37, 6700 AA WAGENINGEN, the Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We started a geochemical mapping campaign in the Early Pleistocene fluviatile Kedichem Formation in the Netherlands in order to meet the demand for more information about subsurface sediment compositions. Geochemical data were collected during a sampling campaign, and about 600 samples from the Kedichem Formation were analyzed. By linking the geochemical data with lithological classifications from the TNO-NITG borehole database, we established a geochemical prediction model.

Elements were divided into classes according to their geochemical behaviour in relation to lithological parameters. For each of the classes, we combined lithological groups in to groups with relevant geochemical differences. By calculating for each element the average composition in each of these groups, we were able to predict the geochemical composition of subsurface sediments by ‘translating’ the spatial lithological data from the TNO-NITG borehole database into geochemical data. We visualized this model by calculating and interpolating the average composition of horizontal slices of the Kedichem Formation. The model performance is fairly good, although it has a tendency to underestimate extreme values.

Keywords

geochemistrymappingsedimentsubsurface
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 79 , Special Issue 4: Geochemical mapping in the Kingdom of the Netherlands , December 2000 , pp. 381 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2000

References

Einsele, G., 1992. Sedimentary basins. Springer-Verlag (Berlin): 628 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geluk, M.C., Duin, E.J.Th., Dusar, M., Rijkers, R.H.B., Van den Berg, M.W. & Van Rooijen, P., 1994. Stratigraphy and tectonics of the Roer Valley Graben. Geologie en Mijnbouw 73: 129–141.Google Scholar
Huisman, D.J., 1998. Geochemical characterization of subsurface sediments in the Netherlands. Ph.D. thesis Wageningen Agricultural University: 175 pp.Google Scholar
Huisman, D.J. & Kiden, P., 1998. A geochemical record of late Cenozoic sedimentation history in the southern Netherlands. Geologie en Mijnbouw 76: 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, D.J., Vermeulen, F.J.H., Baker, J., Veldkamp, A., Kroonenberg, S.B. & Klaver, G.Th., 1997. A geological interpretation of heavy metal concentration sin soils and sediments in the southern Netherlands, Journal of Geochemical Exploration 59: 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, D.J., Weijers, J.P., Dijkshoorn, L. & Veldkamp, A., 2000a. Spatial prediction of variability of Early Pleistocene subsurface sediments in the Netherlands. Part 1: Heavy minerals. In: Van Gaans, P.F.M. & Vriend, S.P. (Eds.): Geochemical mapping in the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Geologie en Mijnbouw / Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 79 (4): 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, D.J., Klaver, G.Th., Veldkamp, A. & Van Os, B.J.H. 2000b. Geochemical compositional changes of the Pliocene-Pleistocene transition in fluviodeltaic deposits in the Netherlands. International Journal of Geosciences/Geologische Rundschau 89: 154–169.Google Scholar
Nederlands Normalisatie Instituut, 1989. Geotechniek classificatie van onverharde grondmonsters - NEN 5105: 23 pp.Google Scholar
Weijers, J.P., 1995. Standaard boor beschrijvingsmethode. Internal Report Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem) GB2463: 76 pp.Google Scholar