Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:33:25.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of the late Carboniferous megaflora from the De Lutte-06 well (Twente, the Netherlands), and its stratigraphical implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

I.M. van Waveren ,
O.A. Abbink ,
T.B. van Hoof  and
J.H.A. van Konijnenburg - van Cittert
I.M. van Waveren*
Affiliation:
Naturalis, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands
O.A. Abbink
Affiliation:
TNO, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
T.B. van Hoof
Affiliation:
TNO, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
J.H.A. van Konijnenburg - van Cittert
Affiliation:
Naturalis, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands
*
1Corresponding author. Email:[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Biostratigraphical re-analysis of palaeobotanical data from the De Lutte-06 well clarifies an earlier controversy regarding the stratigraphical interpretation of this well based on palaeobotanical and palynological analysis. Previous biostratigraphical studies suggested an early Westphalian D age for the major part of the De Lutte formation, with only at the topmost part of the well remnants of presumable but unconfirmed Stephanian deposits. New identifications of palaeobotanical samples illustrate the presence of plant macrofossil assemblages in the De Lutte Formation characteristic for the latest Westphalian D to the Stephanian B-C. These new palaeobotanical insights, therefore, confirm a younger age for the De Lutte Formation and are more in line with the earlier palynological observations from the De Lutte-06 well that suggested that the recovered palynofloras resembled typical Stephanian associations.

Keywords

Plant biostratigraphyWestphalian DStephanianAnnularia spicataOdontopterispalaeobotanypalynology
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 87 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 339 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2008

References

Balme, B.E., 1980. Palynology, and the Carboniferous-Permian boundary in Australia and other Gondwana continents. Palynology 4: 43–55.Google Scholar
Barss, M.S., Hacequebard, P.A. & Howie, R.D., 1963. Palynology and stratigraphy of some Upper Pennsylvanian and Permian Rocks of the Maritime Provinces. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 63 (3): 1–13.Google Scholar
Batenburg, L., 1977. The Sphenophyllum species in the Carboniferous flora of Holz (Westphalian D Saar Basin, Germany). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 24 (2): 1–10.Google Scholar
Besley, B., 2002. Late Carboniferous redbeds of the UK southern North Sea, viewed in a regional context. In: Collinson, J., Evans, D., Holliday, D., Jones, N. (eds): Carboniferous hydrocarbon geology. Yorkshire Geological Society, Occasional Publication 7: 225–229.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A., 1828. Histoire des végétaux fossils, ou recherches botaniques et géologiques sur les végétaux renfermés dans les diverses couches du globe. Tome premier. Ed. Dufour & D’Ocagne, Paris: 448 pp.Google Scholar
Brugman, W.A., Eggink, J.W., Loboziak, S. & Visscher, H., 1985. Late Carboniferous - Early Permian (Ghzelian-Artinskian) palynomorphs. Journal of Micropalaeontology 4(1): 93–106.Google Scholar
Brugman, W.A., Loboziak, S. & Visscher, H., 1988. The problem of the Carboniferous-Permian boundary from a palynological point of view. In: El-Arnauti, A. Owens, B. & Thusu, B. (eds): Subsurface palynostratigraphy of North East Libya. Garyounis University publications (Benghazi, Lybia): 151–155.Google Scholar
Clayton, G., Coquel, R., Doubinger, J., Gueinn, K. J., Loboziak, S. Owens, B. & Streel, M., 1977. Carboniferous miospores of Western Europe: illustration and zonation. Mededelingen van de Rijksgeologische Dienst 29: 1–71.Google Scholar
Cleal, C.J., 1984. The Westphalian D floral biostratigraphy of Saarland (Fed. Rep. Germany) and a comparison with that of South Wales. Geological Journal 19: 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleal, C.J., 2008a. Palaeoflorsitics of Middle Pennsylvanian lyginopteridaleans in Variscan Euramerica. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 261: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleal, C.J., 2008b. Palaeoflorsitics of Middle Pennsylvanian medullosaleans in Variscan Euramerica. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 262: in press.Google Scholar
Cleal, C.J., Zodrow, E.L. & Šimûnek, Z., 2007. Leaf cuticles from the Pennsylvanian-aged medullosalean Odontopteris cantabrica Wagner. Acta Paleobotanica 47 (2): 327–337.Google Scholar
Crookall, R., 1969. Fossil plants from the Carboniferous of Rocks of Great Britain. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain. Palaeontology 4 (5): XXI–XXVIII and 573–792.Google Scholar
Doubinger, J., Vetter, P., Langiaux, J., Galtier, J. & Broutin, J., 1995. La flore fossile du bassin houiller de Saint-Étienne. Mem. Mus. Nation. Hist. Nat. 164: 1–355.Google Scholar
Gorecka, T. & Gorecka-Novak, A., 1990. Palynostratigraphical studies of Upper Carboniferous deposits from the Intra-sudetic Basin, southwestern Poland. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 65: 287–292.Google Scholar
Gupta, S., 1977. Miofloral succession and interpretation of the Permian System in the Eastern shelf of North Central Texas, U.S.A. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 24: 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartkopf-Fröder, Ch., 2005. Palynostratigrafie des Pennsylvanium in Deutschland. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 254: 133–160.Google Scholar
Heckel, P.H. & Clayton, G., 2006a. The Carboniferous System. Use of the new official names for the subsystems, series and stages. Geologica Acta 4: 403–407.Google Scholar
Helby, R., 1966. Sporologische Untersuchungen an der Karbon-Perm Grenze in Pfalzer Bergland. Fortschritte der Geologie Rheinland Westfalen 13: 645–704.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Castillo, G.R., Rothwell, G.W. & Mapes, G., 2001. Thucydiaceae fam. nov., with a review and reevaluation of paleozoic walchian conifers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 (5): 1155–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J. & Cleal, C.J., 2007. The relationship between Euramerican and Cathaysian tropical floras in the Late Palaeozoic: palaeobiogeographical and palaeogeographical implications. Earth-Science Reviews 85: 85–116.Google Scholar
Inosova, K.I., Kruzina, A. Kh. & Shwartsman, E.G., 1976. Atlas of microspores and pollen from the Upper Carboniferous and Lower Permian of the Donets Basin. Nedra, Moscow. 159 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Jongmans, W.J., 1911. Anleitung zur Bestimmung der Karbonpflanzen West-Europas. Thallophytae, Equisetales, Sphenophyllales. Mededelingen van de Rijksopsporing van Delfstoffen 3: 482 pp.Google Scholar
Josten, K.-H., 1966. Zur Flora des jügeren karbons (Westfal C bis Stefan) in Nordwestdeutschland und ihr Vergleich mit andere Gebieten. Fortschritte in der Geologie Rheinland Westfalen Band 13 (1). Geologisches Landesamt (Krefeld, Germany): 565–644.Google Scholar
Josten, K.-H., 1970. Bemerkenswerte Pflanzenfossilien aus dem Oberkarbon des Ruhrgebietes (Westfal B) und Piesberges (Westfal D). Abhandlungen Hessisches Landesamt für Bodenforschung 56: 56–64.Google Scholar
Josten, K.-H., 1991. Die Steinkohlen-Floren Nordwestdeutschlands. Fortschritte in der Geologie Rheinland Westfalen Band 36 (1-2). Geologisches Landesamt (Krefeld, Germany): 434 pp.Google Scholar
Josten, K.-H., 1995. Stratigraphie des Oberkarbons: Untersuchung der Makrofloren (Stratigraphy of the Upper Carboniferous: Investigation of the Fossil Plants). DGMK-Bericht 459-3/1: 1–239.Google Scholar
Josten, K.-H., 2005. Florenstratigraphie des Oberkarbons in Nordwestdeutschland. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg 254: 119–132.Google Scholar
Josten, K.-H. & Van Amerom, H.W.J., 1999. Die Pflanzenfossielen im Westfal D, Stefan und Rotliegend Norddeutschlands. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen Band 39. Geologisches Landesamt (Krefeld, Germany): 168 pp.Google Scholar
Josten, K.-H. & Laveine, J.P., 1984. Paläeobotanisch-Stratigraphische Untersuchungen im Westfal C-D van Nordfrankreich und Nordwestdeutschland. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen Band 32. Geologisches Landesamt (Krefeld, Germany): 89–117.Google Scholar
Josten, K.-H. & Teichmüller, R., 1971. Zusammenfassende Übersicht über das höhere Oberkarbon im Ruhrrevier, Münsterland und Ibbenbürener Raum. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen Band 18. Geologisches Landesamt (Krefeld, Germany): 281–292.Google Scholar
Kerp, H., Noll, R. & Uhl, D., 2007. Vegetationsbilder aus dem saarpfalzischen Permokarbon. In: Schindler, T. & Heidtke, U.H.J. (eds): Kohlensumpfe, Seen und Halbwusten. Pollichia, Sondernveroffentlichung 10: 75–109.Google Scholar
Li, Xing-Xue, Shen, Guang-Long, Tian, Bao-Lin, Wang, Shi-Jun & Ouyang, Shu, 1995. Some notes on Carboniferous and Permian floras in China. 244–302. In: Li, Xing-Xue (ed.): Fossil floras of China through the geological ages. English edition. Guangdong Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou, China: 695 pp.Google Scholar
Lesquereux, L., 1880. Description of the coal flora of the Carboniferous formation in the Pennsylvania and throughout the United States, 1. Board of Commissioners Second Geological Survey (Harrisburg): 694 pp.Google Scholar
Lyons, P.C. & Darrah, W.C., 1989. Earliest conifers of North America: upland and/or paleoclimatic indicators? Palaios 4: 480–486.Google Scholar
Lyons, P.C. & Zodrow, E.L., 1995. Early to mid-twentieth century floral zonation schemes of the Pennsylvanian (late carboniferous) of North America and correlations with the late Carboniferous of Europe. In: Lyons, P.C., Darrah Morey, E. & Wagner, R.H. (eds): Historical perspective of the early twentieth century carboniferous palaeobotany in North America. Geological Society of America Memoir 185: 277–292.Google Scholar
McLean, D., Owens, B. & Neves, R., 2005. Carboniferous miospore biostratigraphy of the North Sea. In: Collinson, J.D., Evans, D.J., Holliday, D.W. &, Jones, N.S. (eds): Carboniferous hydrocarbon geology: the southern North Sea and surrounding onshore areas. Occasional Publications Series of the Yorkshire Geological Society 7: 13–14.Google Scholar
Meaning, M., Weyer, D., Wendt, I. & Drozdzewski, G., 2005. Eine numerische Zeitskala des Pennsylvanium in Mitteleuropa. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 254: 181–198.Google Scholar
Murphy, A. & Salvador, A., 1999. International Stratigraphie Guide. An abridged version. Episodes 22(4): 255–272.Google Scholar
Raabe, H. & Remy, W., 1964. Pflanzenfunde in den roten Schichten von Ibben-büren (vorläufige Mitteilung). N. Jb. Geol. Paläont., Mh, 1964(6): 378–379.Google Scholar
Remy, W. & Remy, R., 1977. Die Floren des Erdaltertums. Verlag Gluckauf GMBH, Essen: 468 pp.Google Scholar
Rothwell, G.W., Mapes, G. & Mapes, R.H., 1997. Late Palaeozoic conifers of North America: structure, diversity and occurrences. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 95: 95–113.Google Scholar
Scotese, C.R., 2005. http://scotese.com (website accessed 2008).Google Scholar
Scott, A.C., 1974. The earliest conifer. Nature, 252 (5477): 707–708.Google Scholar
Shi, G.R., 2006. The marine Permian of East and Northeast Asia: an overview of biostratigraphy, palaeobiogeography and palaeogeographical implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 26: 175–206.Google Scholar
Stampfli, G.M. & Borei, G.D., 2004. A plate tectonic model for the Paleozoic and mesozoic constrained by dynamic plate boundaries and restored synthetic oceanic isochrons. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 196: 17–36.Google Scholar
Van Adrichem Boogaert, H.A. & Kouwe, W.F.P., 1995. Stratigraphie nomenclature of the Netherlands, revision and update by RGD and N0GEPA. Section C Silesian Group. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 50 (1993): 1–40.Google Scholar
Van Amerom, H.W.J., 1996a. The biostratigraphy of borehole ’De Lutte-06’ (East Twente, the Netherlands). Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 55: 83–99.Google Scholar
Von Amerom, H.W.J., 1996b. A new bryophyte species (Hepaticites tortuosus nov. sp.) from the Westphalian D in borehole De Lutte-06, Twente, the Netherlands. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 55: 99–106.Google Scholar
Van Buggenum, J.M. & Den Hartog Jager, D.G., 2007. Silesian. In: Wong, Th.E., Batjes, D.A.J. & de Jager, J. (eds): Geology of the Netherlands. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (Amsterdam): 43–62.Google Scholar
Van de Loor, J.G.M. & Van der Zwan, C.J., 1996. Palynostratigraphy and palynofacies reconstruction of the Carboniferous of borehole ’De Lutte-06’ (East Twente, the Netherlands). Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 55: 61–82.Google Scholar
Van der Meer, M. & Pagnier, H.J.M., 1996, Sediment petrography of sandstone bodies of borehole ’De Lutte-06’ (East Twente, the Netherlands) and its regional significance. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 55: 31–60.Google Scholar
Van der Zwan, C.J., Van de Laar, J.G.M., Pagnier, H.J.M. & Van Amerom, H.W.J., 1993. Palynological, ecological and climatological synthesis of the Upper Carboniferous of the well De Lutte-06 (East Netherlands). Comptes rendus XII ICC-P 1: 167–186.Google Scholar
Wagner, R.H. & Alvarez-Vasquez, C., 1991. Floral characterisation and biozones of the Westphalian D stage in NW Spain. Neues Jahrbuch für Palaeontologie Abhandlungen 183: 171–202.Google Scholar
Wagner, R.H. & Spinner, E., 1974. The stratigraphical implications of the Westphalian D macro- and microflora and the Forest of Dean Coalfield (Gloucestershire) England. Proceedings 24th International Geological Congress, 1972, Section 7 (Montreal): 428–437.Google Scholar
Wagner, R.H., Villegas, F.J. & Fonolla, F., 1969. Description of the lower Cantabrian stratotype near Tejerina (Léon-NW Spain). Comptes rendus du 6-ième Congrès International de le Stratigraphie Géologique du Carbonifère (Washington, 1979) 2: 109–134.Google Scholar
Zeiller, S., 1880. Végétaux fossiles du terrain houiller de la France. Extrait du Tome IV de l’explication de la carte géologique de la France: 181 pp.Google Scholar