Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:38:16.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A provisional Quaternary and Neogene lithostratigraphical framework for Great Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

A.A. McMillan
A.A. McMillan*
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA, Scotland, UK. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents an overview of a provisional lithostratigraphical framework for the Quaternary and Neogene deposits of Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) (onshore). The objective is to provide a workable framework to aid future Quaternary mapping and research, and a stratigraphical scheme capable of use in a wide variety of applications. Using the full hierarchy, a supergroup, group and subgroup lithostratigraphy, based upon the primary mapping unit, the formation, is proposed. It is recommended that some classes of lithogenetically-defined deposits which, at present cannot be accorded formational status, should be assigned informally to one of the proposed groups or subgroups. The framework distinguishes one superficial deposits supergroup within which seven groups are defined: i) Crag Group, marine deposits (Late Pliocene to Early Pleistocene); ii), Dunwich Group, fluvial deposits (pre-Anglian/pre-Elsterian); iii) Residual Deposits Group; iv) British Coastal Deposits Group, coastal and marine deposits (Anglian to Holocene); v) Britannia Catchments Group, fluvial, organic and mass movement deposits (Anglian to Holocene) within broadly defined catchment areas related to Late Devensian to present-day physiography; vi) Albion Glacigenic Group, glacigenic deposits (pre-Devensian/pre-Weichselian), and vii) Caledonia Glacigenic Group, glacigenic deposits (Devensian/Weichselian). North of the Devensian (Weichselian) ice-sheet limit, a series of glacigenic subgroups are defined geographically for the two glacigenic groups on the basis of mappable formations of till. The subgroups include associated formations of glaciofluvial and glaciolacustrine deposits. Consequently some of the glacigenic water-lain units may extend beyond the Devensian limit. Catchment subgroups of the Britannia Catchments Group are proposed for formations and lithogenetic units defined within broad present-day physiographic regions by major river drainage systems that have developed since Middle Pleistocene time. Lithostratigraphical description and correlation of formations will aid the refinement of the proposed framework and enable the development of lithostratigraphical maps and three-dimensional models. As well as offering a unified framework for onshore Quaternary and Neogene deposits the proposed supergroup, group and subgroup structure may prove useful for a wide range of regional applications (e.g. hydrological, hydrogeological, engineering).

Keywords

Quaternary and Neogene lithostratigraphyGlacigenic sedimentsCatchments (drainage basins)Fluvial sedimentsCoastal sedimentsGreat Britain
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 84 , Special Issue 2: Upper Cenozoic stratigraphy of the southern North Sea and Baltic basins , July 2005 , pp. 87 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2005

References

Allen, J.R.L.. & Gibbard, P.L., 1994. Pleistocene evolution of the Solent River of southern England. Quaternary Science Reviews 12: 503–528.Google Scholar
Ambrose, K. (Compiler), 2000. Specifications for the preparation of 1:10 000 scale geological maps. British Geological Survey Research Report RR/00/02.Google Scholar
Andrews, J.T., 1979. The present ice age: Cenozoic. In: John, B.S. (ed.): The Winters of the World. David and Charles (London and North Pomfret (Vt)): 173–218.Google Scholar
Arthurton, R.S., Booth, S.J., Morigi, A.N., Abbott, M.A.W. & Wood, C.J., 1994. Geology of the country around Great Yarmouth. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, Sheet 162 (England and Wales): 138 pp.Google Scholar
Balson, P.S., Mathers, S.J. & Zalasiewicz, J.A., 1993. The lithostratigraphy of the Coralline Crag (Pliocene) of Suffolk. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 104: 59–70.Google Scholar
Barras, B.F. & Paul, M.A., 1999. Sedimentology and depositional history of the Claret Formation (‘carse clay’) at Bothkennar, near Grangemouth. Scottish Journal of Geology 35: 131–143.Google Scholar
Bateman, R.M. & Rose, J., 1994. Fine sand mineralogy of the early and middle Pleistocene Bytham Sands and Gravels of midland England and East Anglia. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 105: 33–39.Google Scholar
Bishop, W.W. & Coope, G.R., 1977. Stratigraphical and faunal evidence for Lateglacial and Flandrian environments in south-west Scotland. In: Gray, J.M. & Lowe, J.J. (eds): Studies in the Lateglacial environment. Pergamon (Oxford): 61–68.Google Scholar
Bowen, D.Q., 1978. Quaternary geology. A stratigraphic framework for multi-disciplinary work. Pergamon Press (Oxford): 86–94.Google Scholar
Bowen, D.Q. (ed.), 1999. A revised correlation of Quaternary deposits in the British Isles. Special Report of the Geological Society of London No. 23. The Geological Society (London): 174 pp.Google Scholar
Bowen, D.Q., Phillips, P.M., McCabe, A.M., Knutz, P.C. & Sykes, G.A., 2002. New data for the Last Glacial Maximum in Great Britain and Ireland. Quaternary Science Reviews 21: 89–101.Google Scholar
Browne, M.A.E. & McMillan, A.A., 1989. Quaternary geology of the Clyde valley. British Geological Survey Research Report SA/89/1. British Geological Survey (Keyworth, Nottingham): 63 pp.Google Scholar
Browne, M.A.E., Graham, D.K. & Gregory, D.M., 1984. Quaternary estuarine deposits in the Grangemouth area, Scotland. British Geological Survey Report 16(3). HMSO (London): 14 pp.Google Scholar
Cameron, T.D.J., Crosby, A., Balson, P.S., Jeffery, D.H., Lott, G.K., Bulat, J. & Harrison, D.J., 1992. United Kingdom Offshore Regional Report: the geology of the southern North Sea. HMSO for British Geological Survey (London): 152 pp.Google Scholar
Catt, J.A., 1991. The Quaternary history and glacial deposits of East Yorkshire. In: Ehlers, J., Gibbard, P.L. & Rose, J. (eds): Glacial deposits in Britain and Ireland. Balkema Press (Rotterdam): 185–191.Google Scholar
Catt, J.A. & Penny, L.H., 1966. The Pleistocene deposits of Holderness, East Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 35: 375–420.Google Scholar
Chadwick, R.A. & 16 others. Geology of the Isle of Man and its offshore area. British Geological Survey Research Report RR/01/06. British Geological Survey (Keyworth, Nottingham): 143 pp.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.R. & Auton, C.A., 1982. The Pleistocene depositional history of the Norfolk-Suffolk hinterland. In: IGS Short Communications. Report of the Institute of Geological Sciences, 82/1. HMSO (London): 23–29.Google Scholar
Dines, H.G., Hollingworth, S.E., Edwards, W., Buchan, S. & Welch, F.B.A., 1940. The mapping of Head deposits. Geological Magazine 77: 198–226.Google Scholar
Edmonds, E.A., McKeown, M.C. & Williams, M., 1975. British Regional Geology South West England. 4th Edition. HMSO (London): 79–80.Google Scholar
Foster, S.S.D., Morigi, A.N. & Browne, M.A.E., 1999. Quaternary geology - towards meeting user requirements. British Geological Survey (Keyworth, Nottingham): 39 pp.Google Scholar
Funnell, B.M., 1995. Global sea-level and the (pen-)insularity of late Cenozoic Britain. In: Preece, R.C. (ed.): Island Britain: a Quaternary perspective. The Geological Society (London) Special Publication 96: 3–13.Google Scholar
Funnell, B.M., 1996. Plio-Pleistocene palaeogeography of the southern North Sea Basin (3.75-0.60 Ma). Quaternary Science Reviews 15: 391–405.Google Scholar
Funnell, B.M. & West, R.G., 1977. Preglacial Pleistocene deposits of East Anglia. In: Shotton, F.W. (ed.): British Quaternary Studies: Recent Advances. University Press (Oxford): 247–265.Google Scholar
Gibbard, P.L. & Turner, C., 1988. In defence of the Wolstonian Stage. Quaternary Newsletter 54: 9–14.Google Scholar
Gibbard, P.L., West, R.G., Zagwijn, W.H., Balson, P.S., Burger, A.W., Funnell, B.M., Jeffery, D.H., Jong, J. de, Kolfschoten, T. van, Lister, A.M., Meijer, T., Norton, P.E.P., Preece, R.C., Rose, J., Stuart, A.J., Whiteman, C.A. & Zalasiewicz, J.A., 1991. Early and early Middle Pleistocene correlations in the Southern North Sea Basin. Quaternary Science Reviews 10: 23–52.Google Scholar
Gordon, J.E. & Sutherland, D.G., 1993. Quaternary of Scotland. Geological Conservation Review Series 6. Joint Nature Conservation Committee (Peterborough): 695 pp.Google Scholar
Gradstein, P.M., Ogg, J.G. and others., 2004. A Geologic Time Scale 2004. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamblin, R.J.O., Moorlock, B.S.P., Booth, S.J., Jeffery, D.H. & Morigi, A.N., 1997. The Red and Norwich Crag formations in eastern Suffolk. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 108: 11–23.Google Scholar
Hey, R.W., 1965. Highly quartzose pebble gravels in the London Basin. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 76: 403–420.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J.M., 1964. The low-level Pleistocene marine sands and gravels of the West Sussex coastal plain. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 75: 547–561.Google Scholar
Laban, C., Rijsdijk, K.F., Passchier, S., Weerts, H.J.T., Ebbing, J.H.J. & Van Leeuwen, R.J., 2003. Integrated stratigraphy of the Netherlands: consequences for the stratigraphical model of the Dutch sector of the North Sea. In: Laban, C., Passchier, S. & Rijsdijk, K. (Eds): Extended Abstracts for the International Workshop on Integrated Land - Sea Lithostratigraphic Correlation, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO - National Geological Survey (Utrecht): 22–27.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, E., 1983. The Pleistocene stratigraphy of Skåne, southern Sweden. In: Ehlers, J. (ed.): Glacial deposits in North-west Europe. Balkema Press (Rotterdam): 155–159.Google Scholar
Lebret, P., Campy, M., Coutard, J-P., Fourniguet, J., Isambert, M., Lautridou, J-P., Laville, P., Macaire, J-J., Ménillet, F. & Meyer, R., 1993. Cartographie des formations superficielles. Réactualisation des principes de representation à 1 : 50 000. Géologie de la France 4: 39–54.Google Scholar
Lee, J.R., Rose, J., Riding, J.B., Moorlock, B.S.P. & Hamblin, R.J.O., 2002. Testing the case for a Middle Pleistocene Scandinavian glaciation in Eastern England: evidence for a Scottish ice source for tills within the Cortón Formation of East Anglia, UK. Boreas 31: 345–355.Google Scholar
Lewis, S.G., 1993. The status of the Wolstonian glaciation in the English Midlands and East Anglia. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Lister, A.M., 1998. The age of Early Pleistocene mammal faunas from the ‘Weybourne Crag’ and Cromer Forest-bed Formation (Norfolk, England). In: Van Kolfschoten, T. & Gibbard, P.L. (eds): The Dawn of the Quaternary: Proceedings of the SEQS-EuroMam Symposium, Kerkrade, Holland, 16 – 21 June 1996. Mededelingen Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen TNO, No 60: 271–280.Google Scholar
Lister, A.M., 2000. Pliocene to Early Pleistocene mammal faunas from the Norwich Crag and Cromer Forest-bed Formations. In: Lewis, S.G., Whiteman, C.A. & Preece, R.C. (eds): The Quaternary of Norfolk and Suffolk. Field Guide. Quaternary Research Association (London): 47–48.Google Scholar
Lowe, J.J. & Walker, M.J.C., 1997. Reconstructing Quaternary Environments. 2nd edition. Addison Wesley Longman (Harlow): 446 pp.Google Scholar
Mathers, S.J., & Zalasiewicz, J.A., 1988. The Red Crag and Norwich Crag formations of southern East Anglia. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 99: 261–278.Google Scholar
McKenny-Hughes, T., 1887. On the drifts of the Vale of Clwyd and their relation to the caves and cave deposits. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London 43: 73–120.Google Scholar
McMillan, A.A., 2002. Quaternary Geology in the 21st century - a perspective from the British Geological Survey. Quaternary Science Reviews 21: 889–899.Google Scholar
McMillan, A.A. & Powell, J.H., 1999. BGS Rock Classification Scheme: the classification of artificial (man-made) ground and natural superficial deposits: applications to geological maps and datasets in the UK. British Geological Survey Research Report RR/99/4. Available at http://www.bgs.ac.uk/bgsrcs/home.html.Google Scholar
McMillan, A.A. & Hamblin, R.J.O., 2000. A mapping-related lithostratigraphical framework for the Quaternary of the UK. Quaternary Newsletter 92: 21–34.Google Scholar
McMillan, A.A. & Hamblin, R.J.O., in prep. A lithostratigraphical framework for Quaternary and Neogene deposits of Great Britain (onshore). British Geological Survey Research Report.Google Scholar
McMillan, A.A., Hamblin, R.J.O. & Merritt, J.W., in prep., 2005. An overview of the lithostratigraphical framework for Quaternary and Neogene deposits of Great Britain (onshore). British Geological Survey Research Report RR/04/04.Google Scholar
McMillan, A.A., Merritt, J.W., Auton, C.A. & Golledge, N.R., in prep., 2005. The Quaternary geology of the Solway area. British Geological Survey Research Report.Google Scholar
Merritt, J.W. & Auton, C.A., 2000. An outline of the Uthostratigraphy and depositional history of Quaternary deposits in the Sellafield district, west Cumbria. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 53: 129–154.Google Scholar
Merritt, J.W., Auton, C.A., Connell, E.R., Hall, A.M. & Peacock, J.D., 2003. The Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, Sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland): 178 pp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G.F., Penny, L.F., Shotton, F.W. & West, R.G., 1973. A correlation of Quaternary deposits in the British Isles. Special Report of the Geological Society, London No. 4. The Geological Society (London): 99 pp.Google Scholar
Moorlock, B.S.P., Hamblin, R.J.O., Booth, S.J. & Woods, M.A., 2002. Geology of Mundesley and North Walsham district - a brief explanation of the geological map. Sheet Explanation of the British Geological Survey Sheets 132 and 148 (England and Wales). British Geological Survey (Keyworth, Nottingham): 34 pp.Google Scholar
North American Commission on stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1983. North American stratigraphic code. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 67: 841–875.Google Scholar
Paterson, I.B., Armstrong, M. & Browne, M.A.E., 1981. Quaternary estuarine deposits in the Tay - Earn area, Scotland. Report of the Institute of Geological Sciences 81/7. HMSO (London): 35 pp.Google Scholar
Peacock, J.D., Graham, O.K. & Wilkinson, I.P., 1978. Late-glacial and postglacial marine environments at Ardyne, Scotland and their significance in the interpretation of the Clyde sea area. Report of the Institute of Geological Sciences 78/17. HMSO (London): 25 pp.Google Scholar
Pepper, D.M., 1973. A comparison of the ‘Argile à Silex’ of Northern France with the ‘Clay-with-Flints’ of Southern England. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 84: 331–352.Google Scholar
Quesnel, F., 2003. The Neogene and Quaternary clay-with-flints north and south of the English Channel: comparisons of distribution, age, genetic processes and geodynamics. Journal of Quaternary Science 18: 283–294.Google Scholar
Rawson, F.F. & 16 others, 2002. Stratigraphical procedure. Geological Society, London, Professional Handbook. The Geological Society (London): 57 pp.Google Scholar
Reid, C., 1890. The Pliocene deposits of Britain. Memoir of the Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Rose, J., 1988. Stratigraphical nomenclature for the British Middle Pleistocene - procedural dogma or stratigraphic common sense? Quaternary Newsletter 54: 15–20.Google Scholar
Rose, J., 1994. Major river systems of central and southern Britain during the Early and Middle Pleistocene. Terra Nova 6: 435–443.Google Scholar
Rose, J., 2002. Editorial. Quaternary Science Reviews 21: 871.Google Scholar
Rose, J. & Allen, P., 1977. Middle Pleistocene stratigraphy in south-east Suffolk. Journal of the Geological Society, London 133: 85–102.Google Scholar
Rose, J., Lowe, J.J. & Switzur, R., 1988. A radiocarbon date on plant detritus beneath till from the type area of the Loch Lomond Readvance. Scottish Journal of Geology 24: 113–124.Google Scholar
Rose, J., Moorlock, B.S.P. & Hamblin, R.J.O., 2001. Pre-Anglian fluvial and coastal deposits in Eastern England: lithostratigraphy and palaeoenvironments. Quaternary International 79: 5–22.Google Scholar
Salvador, A., 1994. International stratigraphic Guide. A guide to stratigraphic classification, terminology, and procedure. 2nd Edition. The International Union of Geological Sciences and The Geological Society of America (Colorado): 214 pp.Google Scholar
Shackleton, N.J., Berger, A. & Peltier, W.R., 1990. An alternative astronomical calibration of the Lower Pleistocene timescale based on 0DP Site 667. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 81: 251–261.Google Scholar
Shackleton, N.J. & Opdyke, N.D., 1973. Oxygen isotope and palaeomagnetic stratigraphy of Equatorial Pacific core V28-239, Late Pliocene to Latest Pleistocene. In: Cline, R.M. & Hays, J.D. (eds): Investigation of late Quaternary paleoceanography and palaeoclimatology. Geological Society of America Memoir No. 145. Geological Society of America (Boulder): 449–464.Google Scholar
Schenck, H.G. & Muller, S.W., 1941. stratigraphic terminology. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 52: 1419–1426.Google Scholar
Smith, A. & and Rose, J., 1997. A new find of Quaternary quartzite-rich gravel near Letchworth, Hertfordshire, southeastern England. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 108: 317–326.Google Scholar
Stoker, M.S., Long, D. & Fyfe, J.A., 1985. A revised Quaternary stratigraphy for the central North Sea. British Geological Survey Report 17 No.2. HMSO (London): 35 pp.Google Scholar
Ventris, P.A., 1985. Pleistocene environmental history of the Nar Valley, Norfolk. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Walton, G. & Lee, M.K., 2001. Geology for our diverse economy: report of the Programme Development Group for Onshore Geological Surveys. British Geological Survey (Keyworth, Nottingham): 99 pp.Google Scholar
West, R.G., 1961. Vegetational history of the Early Pleistocene at the Royal Society Borehole at Ludham, Norfolk. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series В 155: 437–453.Google Scholar
West, R.G., 1980. The pre-glacial Pleistocene of the Norfolk and Suffolk coasts. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Whiteman, C.A. & Rose, J., 1992. Thames River sediments of the British Early and Middle Pleistocene. Quaternary Science Reviews 11: 363–375.Google Scholar
Whittaker, A., Cope, J.C.W. & Cowie, J.W., 1991. A guide to stratigraphical procedure. Journal of the Geological Society, London 148: 813–824.Google Scholar
Willman, H.B. & Frye, J.C., 1970. Pleistocene stratigraphy of Illinois. Illinois State Geological Survey Bulletin 94: 204 pp.Google Scholar
Worsley, P., 1991. Glacial deposits of the lowlands between the Mersey and Severn Rivers. In: Ehlers, J., Gibbard, P.L. & Rose, J. (eds): Glacial deposits in Britain and Ireland. Balkema Press (Rotterdam): 203–211.Google Scholar
Wright, W.B., 1937. The Quaternary Ice Age. 2nd Edition. Macmillan (London): 478 pp.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H. 1992. The beginnings of the Ice Age in Europe and its major subdivisions. Quaternary Science Reviews 11: 583–591.Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, I.A., Mathers, S.J., Hughes, M.J., Gibbard, P.L., Peglar, S.M., Harland, R., Nicholson, R.A., Boulton, G.S., Cambridge, P. & Wealthall, G.P. 1988. Stratigraphy and palaeoenvironments of the Red Crag and Norwich Crag formations between Aldeburgh and Sizewell, Suffolk, England. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series В 322: 221–272.Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, J.A., Mathers, S.J., Gibbard, P.L., Peglar, S.M., Funnell, B.M., Catt, J.A., Harland, R., Long, P.E. & Austin, T.J.F. 1991. Age and relationships of the Chillesford Clay (early Pleistocene: Suffolk, England). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series В 333: 81–100.Google Scholar