Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:33:17.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A proposal for an updated and revised stratigraphical framework of the Miocene in the Achterhoek (eastern Netherlands)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2024

Dirk K. Munsterman*
Affiliation:
TNO - Geological Survey of the Netherlands, Subsurface Modelling, Utrecht, Netherlands
Maarten Van den Bosch
Affiliation:
Geologisch Veldlaboratorium Winterswijk, Winterswijk, Netherlands
Frank P. Wesselingh
Affiliation:
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Marian Helwerda
Affiliation:
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands
Freek S. Busschers
Affiliation:
TNO - Geological Survey of the Netherlands, Subsurface Modelling, Utrecht, Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: Dirk K. Munsterman; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The comprehensive overview of Neogene lithostratigraphy in the eastern Netherlands dates back to the mid-1970s. In the present study, continuous gamma-ray logs and in situ sediment core samples from six boreholes in the area allowed palynological and mollusc analyses and wireline log-based correlation. These investigations were aimed at updating and revising the existing Neogene lithostratigraphy within the Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands by integrating litho-, bio-, and sequence-stratigraphic approaches. The analytical results yielded the establishment of new holo- and lectostratotype sections, together with cross-border interregional correlation. The lithostratigraphic revision resulted in the modified definition of the Aalten, Eibergen and Delden members and the definition of two new proposed members: the Dale and Doetinchem members. The Ticheloven bed, removed in earlier studies, is proposed to be reinstated, and the Stemerdink Bed is upgraded in its hierarchical status to the Stemerdink member. All lithostratigraphic units are included in the present Miocene subdivision of the Groote Heide and Diessen formations, which include three recognisable unconformities: the Early-Miocene Unconformity (EMU), Mid-Miocene Unconformity (MMU) and Late-Miocene Unconformity (LMU). The new, revised, reintroduced and existing local lithostratigraphic units and sequences are discussed with their counterparts in the south and southeast of the Netherlands, in Germany and Belgium, and from this a regionally consistent framework has emerged of the regional Neogene lithostratigraphy.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Netherlands Journal of Geosciences Foundation

Introduction

The stratigraphic insights into the Neogene successions of the southern Netherlands (the Brabant and Limburg provinces) have been further developed in recent years following several H3O (Deckers et al., Reference Deckers, Vernes, Dabekaussen, Den Dulk, Doornenbal, Dusar, Matthijs, Menkovic, Reindersma, Walstra, Westerhoff and Witmans2014; Vernes et al., Reference Vernes, Deckers, Bakker, Bogemans, De Ceukelaire, Doornenbal, den Dulk, Dusar, Van Haren, Heyvaert, Kiden, Kruisselbrink, Lanckacker, Menkovic, Meyvis, Munsterman, Reindersma, ten Veen, van de Ven, Walstra and Witmans2018; Vernes et al., Reference Vernes, Deckers, Walstra, Kruisselbrink, Menkovic, Bogemans, De Ceukelaire, Dirix, Dusar, Hummelman, Maes, Meyvis, Munsterman, Reindersma, Rombaut, Van Baelen, Van de Ven, Van Haren and Welkenhuysen2023) and related internal TNO projects. These projects are led by TNO – Geological Survey of the Netherlands in cooperation with institutions of neighbouring countries, the Flemish Institute for Technical Research (VITO, Belgium), the Royal Institute of Natural Sciences (RINS, Belgium) and the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR, Germany). These projects are designed to establish cross-border harmonisation of hydrological/geological units, through mapping and the construction of hydrogeological models. The results of these studies have led to significant improvement in the development and correlation of Cenozoic successions. In these studies, a new semi sequence-stratigraphic approach was applied, integrating several disciplines, including lithological description, log correlation, biostratigraphic and seismic survey. This has resulted in an update and revision of definitions of lithostratigraphic units (individual description of lithostratigraphic units are the official building blocks of the Stratigraphic Nomenclature that the Dutch Geological Survey publishes in the Dinoloket.nl website). For example, the Miocene Breda Formation has been upgraded to the Breda Subgroup and split into the new Groote Heide and Diessen formations (Munsterman et al., Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019). The newly identified lithostratigraphic units are also based on regional discontinuities such as the Early-, Mid- and Late-Miocene Unconformities (EMU, MMU and LMU). Persistent problems with lithostratigraphic transitions (Veldhoven/Breda and Breda/Oosterhout) in the southern Netherlands and with correlations of these units and lateral equivalents in neighbouring countries were thus overcome for the southern part of Netherlands. A regionally consistent framework has emerged.

Problem statement

In the southern part of the Netherlands, the Geological Survey of the Netherlands has defined an accurate lithostratigraphic framework for the Paleogene–Neogene successions (Stratigraphic Commission, resolution 12-03-2024). This contrasts with the eastern Netherlands where such a framework is lacking, and which relies upon the chronostratigraphic ‘floating’ classification of local lithostratigraphic units by Van den Bosch et al. (Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975). The Breda Formation (Miocene) was locally distinguished by four different members in the Achterhoek (Table 1). Here, the holostratotype sections were based on poor-quality borehole techniques, whereas samples of the type locality are only partially available.

Table 1. Holostratotype sections of Miocene members in the Achterhoek (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975).

The holostratotype borehole sections were drilled (by co-author Maarten van den Bosch) using poorly executed straight-flush drillings, including a small diameter drill. This method is limited by a lack accurate depth control and, hence, important lithological details are not available. Over the past 40 years, advances in understanding and experience have brought improved drilling techniques that increase sample resolution (Van den Bosch, Reference Van den Bosch2015), which allow a revision of the original lithostratigraphic scheme.

The way forward

In the present study, the geological interpretation of Miocene strata in the eastern region is improved, following the example of the methodology used in the southern Netherlands. Previous palynological analyses on the proposed borehole sections are expanded. These results are correlated on the basis of sediment log characteristics, via type-section boreholes, to the updated and revised lithostratigraphic framework in the southern part of the country (i.e. the Venlo and Roer Valley grabens) so that they align with the current sequence stratigraphic framework for the region. The local lithostratigraphy in the Achterhoek district has been updated and revised where necessary. The current study provides new lectostratotype sections in boreholes in the Gaanderen (B40F1874) and De Haart (B41G0024) boreholes in regard to the existing Miocene Zenderen Member (Fig. 1). New (Dale member and Doetinchem member), amended (Aalten, Stemerdink, Eibergen and Delden members) and reintroduced (Ticheloven bed) lithostratigraphic units are described here (see also Addendum, below). From the perspective of stratigraphic coherence, this development is not only necessary but also a logical intermediate step towards a northwards correlation of successions into the offshore subsurface of the Netherlands’ North Sea sector.

Figure 1. Location map of the eastern part of the Netherlands showing the E-W transect from Winterswijk to Didam including all boreholes and logs (www.dinoloket.nl). The transect is plotted on the Miocene base (DGM v2.2; TNO-GDN, 2023) with the transition from red to blue colors representing increase in depth. Fault lines are indicated in grey (DGM v2.2; TNO-GDN, 2023; supplemented with one fault line of Van den Bos & Brouwer, Reference Van den Bosch en Brouwer2009 south of borehole B41E0258).

Study area and methods

Study area

The Achterhoek (in the Low-Saxon language ‘Achterhook’ is a remote area) is a region in the province of Gelderland in the eastern part of the country. This region is also called ‘De Graafschap’ (in English: ‘County’), after the old county of Zutphen, which in the broadest sense covers an area bordered by the regions of Salland and Twente (in Overijssel province) in the north, to the German border in the east and southeast, and the river IJssel in the southwest (Fig. 1).

The geology and stratigraphy, in particular from the Mesozoic, of the Achterhoek has been described in detail by Waterschoot van der Gracht (Reference Waterschoot van der Gracht1918), Gerth (Reference Gerth1955), Pannekoek (Reference Pannekoek1956), Harsveldt (Reference Harsveldt1963), Stapert (Reference Stapert1974), Herngreen & de Boer (Reference Herngreen and de Boer1974), Van den Bosch (Reference Van den Bosch1994; Reference Van den Bosch1996; Reference Van den Bosch1999; Reference Van den Bosch2022), Van den Bosch et al. (Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975), Van Adrichem Boogaert and Kouwe (Reference Van Adrichem Boogaert and Kouwe1993-1997), Herngreen et al. (Reference Herngreen, de Boer, Romein, Lissenberg and Wijker1983; Reference Herngreen, Hartkopf-Froder and Ruegg1994; Reference Herngreen, Van den Bosch and Lissenberg2000), Janssen (Reference Janssen1984), Peletier & Kolstee (Reference Peletier and Kolstee1986), Geluk (Reference Geluk1998), Van den Berg et al. (2000), Van den Bosch & Kleijer (Reference Van den Bosch and Kleijer2003) and Van den Bosch & Brouwer (Reference Van den Bosch en Brouwer2009), among others. The Neogene strata of the Achterhoek have yielded exceptionally rich and internationally important vertebrate and invertebrate faunal assemblages that have been subject of extensive studies (e.g. Janssen, Reference Janssen1984; Bor et al., Reference Bor, Reinecke and Verschueren2012; Schwarzhans, Reference Schwarzhans2010). They have also provided important insights into regional ecosystem and biotic development during the Miocene.

Figure 2 shows an overview of the important structural units, fault zones and salt structures in the geological development of the eastern part of the Netherlands. During the Paleogene and Neogene, the Achterhoek area was part of a marine, southern North Sea basin. The contours of this basin during the Langhian Stage (Middle Miocene Subseries) are reflected in the palaeogeographic map (Fig. 3). The cumulation of several Mesozoic tectonic phases provoked a predominantly directed NW-SE structural trend in the area (Geluk, Reference Geluk1998). Here, the Paleogene and Neogene were marked by the most pronounced subsidence in the western part of the area. Starting in the latest Neogene, uplift in the east of the district (Achterhoek High) resulted in erosion of the Paleogene and Neogene deposits. This uplift continues today. Consequently, the Neogene strata are now located in the shallow subsurface in the east at Miste and dip towards larger depths (Fig. 1).

Figure 2. The main structural elements in the eastern part of the Netherlands (after Geluk, Reference Geluk1998).

Figure 3. Palaeogeographic map of the mid-Miocene (after Gibbard & Lewin, Reference Gibbard and Lewin2016).

Borehole and gamma-ray log data

To establish holo- and additional lectostratotype sections, boreholes encountering high-quality in situ sediment were selected, based on the analyses including continuous (gamma-ray) wireline logs, in order to enable interregional correlations. The boreholes currently examined from the Achterhoek and the Miocene reference drill holes on the Venlo and Campine Blocks are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Borehole meta-data information.

*Air-lift borehole: addition of air to the drilling fluid reduces the density of the drilling fluid in the drill pipe. Since the density of the drilling fluid is greater on the other side of the drill pipe (i.e. in the borehole), an upward flow is created in the drill pipe. Generally, the air-lifting borehole technology provides mixed samples with an accuracy for every 1 m. Nowadays, however, the sample resolution may be improved up to 0.25 m.

**Temporary: excavated in 2013.

For all boreholes, standardised lithological descriptions (SBB5.1, Bosch, Reference Bosch2000 and NEN 5104, Munsterman & Van den Bosch, Reference Munsterman and Van den Bosch2021) and gamma-ray logs are available from the NLOG (https://www.nlog.nl/welkom-bij-nlog) or DINO booth (https://www.dinoloket.nl/) portals.

Palynological analysis

Samples from the borings studied were selected for palynological analysis. In air-lift drilling operations samples were taken every 1 to 3 m intervals. Recently however, using novel drilling technique, a maximum sample resolution of four samples per metre could even be reached (Van den Bosch, Reference Van den Bosch2015).

In order to support the correlation of lithology- and gamma-ray logs, organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts (dinocysts) analysis (Fensome & Munsterman, Reference Fensome, Munsterman, Gradstein, Ogg, Schmitz and Ogg2020) was undertaken. This type of analysis has led to significant improvements in age-dating of Neogene successions in NW Europe and beyond, and in understanding their palaeoenvironmental setting (e.g. Powell, Reference Powell1986, Reference Powell and Powell1992; Head et al., Reference Head, Norris and Mudie1989; Zevenboom, Reference Zevenboom1995; De Verteuil and Norris, Reference De Verteuil and Norris1996; Dybkjaer & Rasmussen, Reference Dybkjær and Rasmussen2000; Louwye, Reference Louwye2002; Louwye et al., Reference Louwye, Head and De Schepper2004; Köthe, Reference Köthe2007; Köthe et al., Reference Köthe, Gaedicke and Lutz2008; Dybkjaer & Piasecki, Reference Dybkjær and Piasecki2010; Anthonissen, Reference Anthonissen2012; Quaijtaal et al., Reference Quaijtaal, Donders, Persicoc and Louwye2014; De Schepper et al., Reference De Schepper, Beck and Mangerud2017; Dybkjaer et al., Reference Dybkjaer, Rasmussen, Esbensen and Mathiesen2018; Deckers & Louwye, Reference Deckers and Louwye2019; Everaert et al., Reference Everaert, Munsterman, De Schutter, Bosselaers, Van Boeckel, Cleemput and Bor2020; Munsterman & Deckers, Reference Munsterman and Deckers2020). The potential of applying the results of dinoflagellate cyst analyses in biostratigraphic differentiation for Neogene intervals in the Netherlands has also been proven (e.g. Munsterman & Brinkhuis, Reference Munsterman and Brinkhuis2004; Munsterman et al., Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019; Dearing Crampton Flood et al., Reference Dearing Crampton-Flood, Noorbergen, Smits, Boschman, Donders, Munsterman and Sinninghe Damsté2020; Deckers & Munsterman, Reference Deckers and Munsterman2020; Munsterman & Deckers, Reference Munsterman and Deckers2022).

Standard palynological techniques, including HCL and HF digestion, no oxidation and 15 µm sieving, were used. The slides were mounted in glycerine jelly. The dinocyst taxonomy follows that cited in the Lentin and Williams Index 2019 (Fensome et al., Reference Fensome, Williams and MacRae2019). A minimum of 200 palynomorphs (spores, pollen and dinoflagellate cysts) were counted on one microscope slide per sample. The remainder of the slides were scanned for rare taxa. Miscellaneous fossils (including Pediastrum, Botryococcus) were also counted, but they are excluded the total sum of 200 specimens.

The Miocene dinoflagellate cyst (dinocyst) zonation was based on Munsterman & Brinkhuis (Reference Munsterman and Brinkhuis2004), recalibrated to the Geological Time Scale of Ogg et al., Reference Ogg, Ogg and Gradstein2016 (Munsterman et al., Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019). This zonation is based on consistent dinocyst events (mainly on last occurrence data points) from available peer-reviewed palynological contributions in NW Europe. It also includes the application of a global compilation calibrated to palaeomagnetic, calcareous plankton and/or foraminifera/bolboforma (De Verteuil and Norris, Reference De Verteuil and Norris1996; Van Leeuwen, Reference Van Leeuwen2000; Zevenboom, Reference Zevenboom1995 and references herein). The age assessments have been cross-validated by correlation to recognised sea-level fluctuations (Hardenbol et al., Reference Hardenbol, Thierry, Farley, Jacquin, De Graciansky, Vail, Graciansky, Hardenbol, Jacquin and Vail1998; Munsterman & Brinkhuis, Reference Munsterman and Brinkhuis2004). The zonation of Dybkjaer and Piasecki (Reference Dybkjær and Piasecki2010) is more detailed for the Early Miocene, but that of Munsterman and Brinkhuis (Reference Munsterman and Brinkhuis2004) is more differentiated for the Middle to Late Miocene, most of the interval we are dealing with here. Furthermore the succession of dinocyst events during the Neogene slightly diverges in the Danish and southern Dutch part of the North Sea Basin due to major changes in facies caused by the progradation of the Eridanos delta. Therefore, we selected the recalibrated Dutch dinoflagellate cyst zonation of Munsterman and Brinkhuis (Reference Munsterman and Brinkhuis2004) in Munsterman et al. (Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Dinoflagellate cyst zonation sensu Munsterman and Deckers (Reference Munsterman and Deckers2020).

Mollusc analyses

Molluscan study is included on the Aalten and at the base of the Stemerdink members. In order to be able to compare molluscan evidence from the new boreholes, the authors adopted the methods outlined in De Vogel (Reference De Vogel1970, Reference De Vogel1971). Of the fraction over 1 mm up to 500 countable fragments were picked, identified and counted. A number of indicator species used in the works by De Vogel were also used in this study, with zone attribution following the most abundant occurrence of these species in the studied samples. The mollusc-based divisions are acme zones and have been already shown by De Vogel (op.cit.) to be slightly diachronous in some cases. Within the samples studied, the last occurrence date (LOD) of Tritia facki (von Koenen, 1872) provided a recurring biostratigraphic datum consistent with other bio- and lithostratigraphic indicators.

For the newly established De Haart borehole-type section (41G.1-94), half metre samples between 29.00 and 41.00 m depth below the ground surface were analysed. The new borehole is not the same as that reported in De Vogel (Reference De Vogel1970, Reference De Vogel1971 (41E.3-67 interval 11.00–20.80 m below surface). Samples for intervals 36.00–36.50, 38.50–39.00 and 40.00–40.50 m were absent. All samples were washed, picked and identified following methods extensively discussed in De Vogel (Reference De Vogel1970). Twenty species used by that author to visualise faunal successions were counted. The nomenclature of these taxa was kindly updated with help from Mr. J. van der Voort (Ostercappeln, Germany). From the extensive dataset published by De Vogel (op.cit.), approximate numbers were calculated for the De Vlijt, Stemerdink and Miste boreholes to enable direct comparison. The three boreholes comprised sections that were used for earlier definition of chronostratigraphic units. The recalculation of percentages (provided to two decimal places), using the absolute total number of counted specimens provided by De Vogel (op.cit.), will introduce some very small rounding errors that are expected to be irrelevant in data analyses. The relative abundances of four species that were used in stratigraphic zonation were plotted to investigate visually the mollusc acme zones proposed by De Vogel (Reference De Vogel1971). The name of the Spisula acme zone (based on Spisula sp. in de Vogel, Reference De Vogel1971) has here been adjusted to Spisula aff. subtruncata acme zone following identification in Janssen (Reference Janssen1984).

Lithostratigraphy and Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands

The first edition of the Dutch stratigraphic nomenclature dates from 1929. In 1959, the second edition was published principally because many new terms and geological insights had been introduced in the intervening period. The main language was changed to English, with a translation into Dutch, French and German. Royal Geological and Mining Society of the Netherlands (KNGMG) third edition, NAM & RGD (1980) was published over 20 years later. During the period 1993–1997, new chapter versions of Van Adrichem Boogaert & Kouwe were presented. On 8 June 2020, the revised Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands was published online. This version integrated former ‘shallow’ and a ‘deep’ versions and is considered as the up-to-date source for stratigraphic information from the Dutch subsurface (https://www.dinoloket.nl/stratigrafische-nomenclator). The latter has served as a foundation of the present contribution. Basically, the rules for stratigraphic classification, defined in the International Stratigraphic Guide (Salvador, Reference Salvador1994), are followed. The strict distinction between lithostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy is maintained, although classification of various facies types without proper lithological markers is occasionally supported by biostratigraphical information and correlation.

Lithostratigraphic update and revision of the Miocene in the Achterhoek

The local lithostratigraphic units of the Achterhoek Miocene, following Van den Bosch et al. (Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975), are retained as much as possible. The aim of this study is to link local Miocene-age units to the recently established lithostratigraphy of the online Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands. A combined litho-, bio- and sequence-stratigraphic approach has been applied for the improved Neogene lithostratigraphy (Munsterman et al., Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019). This study will focus on necessary adjustments of local lithostratigraphic definitions to align the Groote Heide and Diessen formations, which are distinguished by three regional recognisable unconformities. The results of the adapted local lithostratigraphy in the Achterhoek are as follows:

  1. 1. The reintroduction of the Ticheloven bed.

  2. 2. The increase in hierarchical status of the Stemerdink Bed to Stemerdink member (amended Aalten Member).

  3. 3. The definition of the amended Eibergen and Delden members, and the new Dale and Doetinchem members.

  4. 4. The selection of new lectostratotype sections with regard to the Aalten (amended, including beds), Stemerdink (amended), Eibergen (amended), Zenderen and Delden (amended) members in selected air-lift boreholes Gaanderen (B40F1874) and De Haart (B41G0024).

In order to provide a lithostratigraphic context for these amended and newly defined units and their stratotypes, a newly constructed E–W-oriented profile showing the stratigraphy of the Achterhoek between the cities of Doetinchem and Winterswijk is first presented.

Didam – Winterswijk cross section

An approximate east–west oriented cross section was constructed using 21 archived boreholes from the DINO database (Fig. 5). The borehole evidence was primarily collected using air-lift techniques. Fifteen boreholes included gamma ray (well-log) information. Three additional localities were selected that only contained well-log information (i.e. no registered borehole descriptions were available). In addition, lithological data of the Miste-03 exposure was translated into borehole format and depicted as such in the cross section. For all the boreholes, standardised lithological descriptions (SBB5.1, Bosch, Reference Bosch2000) and gamma-ray logs are available in the DINO portal (www.dinoloket.nl).

Figure 5. E-W orientated lithostratigraphic cross-section using 21 boreholes (see Figure 1 for position of the boreholes), including gamma-ray logs and molluscan zones, if available (see Table 3 for lithostratigraphic unit codes). Correlation lines follow the litho-logs (correlatable horizons with the gamma-ray log are linked by dotted lines to the right). For explanation of the colours of the columns showing the mollusc zones, located left of selected litho-logs (Aalten Member and base Stemerdink member), see legend in Figure 13.

Table 3. New (this study) and old (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975) lithostratigraphic synthesis of the Miocene Achterhoek (*proposed).

The cross section was planned on basis of its perpendicular location to the North Sea Basin rim (Gibbard & Lewin, Reference Gibbard and Lewin2016; Lamb et al., Reference Lamb, Harding, Huuse, Steward and Brocklehurst2017), allowing as much Miocene stratigraphic context as possible. The cross section begins immediately south-east of Didam and approximately follows the line Doetinchem, Varsseveld and Winterswijk. The position of main fault lines was taken from Van den Bosch & Brouwer (Reference Van den Bosch en Brouwer2009), although the tectonic setting, in particular in the east of the profile, is strongly generalised.

This cross section shows a gently dipping Miocene sequence of the Groote Heide and Diest formations (Fig. 5). In the area east of borehole B41D0015, also referred to as the Achterhoek platform, the Groote Heide Formation occurs at or near the surface. West of this borehole the top of the Miocene is positioned at greater depths resulting from a combination of subsidence and subsequent Quaternary glacial and fluvial erosion. The Miocene sequence overlies very stiff clays of the Rupel Formation and in the easternmost part of the cross section, Mesozoic carbonates and sandstones.

The base of the Groote Heide Formation is defined by the Aalten Member and overlies older sediments of the Rupel and locally Mesozoic formations. The base of the Aalten Member comprises a distinct mollusc-bearing, phosphorite and glauconitic clayey sand that fines westwards into sandy clay (Miste Bed). A peak in gamma-ray logs is shown above the base of the Aalten Member, at the level of the phosphorite level. The gamma-ray peak is explained as phosphorites containing radioactive elements. It is succeeded by a silty to sandy clay with a molluscan-rich basal part (Ticheloven bed). The Aalten Member is, in turn, overlain by clays with silt strata (Stemerdink member). The latter two clay units are characterised by an upward decrease and increase in gamma-ray values, respectively. The upper part of the Groote Heide Formation is composed of clays of the Eibergen Member which consists of stiff, mica-rich silty clays that give high gamma-ray readings.

The transition between the Groote Heide and Diessen formations is characterised by an erosion surface. While the clayey Eibergen Member is non-calcareous, and mostly organic rich, this boundary surface is overlain by calcareous, mica-rich, clayey silt and sandy clay, the latter being marked by relatively low gamma-ray values (Dale member). The Dale member is overlain by glauconitic, mostly calcareous loams and sandy loams (friable mixture of relatively moderate proportions of clay, silt and sand particles, containing organic matter) that grade upwards into fine to moderately silty fine sand (Zenderen Member) with generally higher gamma-ray readings. This member is overlain by fine sands of the Delden Member. The Delden Member is less rich in silt compared to underlying unit and shows lower gamma-ray values. The sands are overlain by the Doetinchem member which consists of a distinct basal concentration of molluscs and overlying alternation of sandy loam and silty clay layers.

Overlying the Diessen Formation is the Oosterhout Formation. The base of this formation comprises clean sands of the Goirle Member which give characteristically low in gamma-ray values. This Goirle Member only occurs in the western part of the transect, the unit giving way to an alternation of sands (with low gamma-ray values) and silt layers (Oosterhout Formation (undiff.). Medium-grained sands with distinctly low gamma-ray values and a locally highly erosional base, form the upper part of the Oosterhout Formation (Lievelde Member, formerly referred to as the Scheemda Formation).

Miste Bed and the reintroduction of the Ticheloven bed; Stemerdink Bed raised in hierarchical rank to the Stemerdink member and the amended Aalten Member

In Van den Bosch et al. (Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975), the Ticheloven bed was replaced by the Miste Bed. The reason behind this substitution was, because the Ticheloven bed appeared to correlate with multiple lithostratigraphic units, including parts of the lower Stemerdink and the upper Miste beds (Van den Bosch et al., op.cit.: p.32). Hence, it was recommended to abandon the term Ticheloven bed. During the excavation of the Miste-3 quarry by the Working Group for Tertiary and Quaternary Geology (WTKG-Werkgroep Tertiaire & Kwartaire Geologie) in 2013, the opportunity was taken to sample accurately and describe this profile (Van den Bosch, Reference Van den Bosch2014; Fig. 6). This led to the reintroduction of the Ticheloven bed term.

Figure 6. Lithological and lithostratigraphical overview of the temporary Miste-03 outcrop.

As a result of this study, the Stemerdink Bed (Aalten Member) is raised in hierarchical status to the Stemerdink member (this paper), because the current lithostratigraphic unit has a thickness up to 12 m, which is too bulky. Salvador (Reference Salvador1994) defines a bed as the smallest formal unit customarily applied to layers from a centimetre to a few metres in thickness, hence its change in rank to member status. Changing the rank of a stratigraphical unit does not require the unit’s redefinition. It may be raised without changing its name (Salvador, op.cit.). Hence, the Stemerdink member is here split from the Aalten Member, limiting the latter to the Miste and the Ticheloven beds. Both beds reach a thickness of approximately 4 m and fit well within their definition of rank. In addition, the Miste Bed term has a long-standing and common usage which is already sufficiently established to preserve, despite its nomenclature possibly not exactly conforming to modern terminological rules and procedures (cf. Salvador, Reference Salvador1994).

Lithology and facies

The abundance of the mollusc fauna only occurs at the base of the succession, in the basal 30 cm of the Miste Bed. In the overlying interval, the faunal assemblage becomes rapidly impoverished, a shell-poor section occurs, including whale fossils and phosphorites formed in situ. These phosphorites could possibly be coprolites from the whales. In the Ticheloven bed at the top of the profile in the Miste-03 quarry, the fauna is completely different, in particular many gastropods have disappeared and are replaced by large bivalves including Glycymeris sp. and Arctica islandica. The percentage of gastropods is ca. 50% at the base of the Miste Bed and decreases upwards to values approximately 15% of the total assemblage. The number of species and individuals also decreases sharply upwards. This succession, including the faunal material, corresponds to the ‘former’ Ticheloven bed. This is associated with an increasing water depth. In the transition of the top Miste Bed (top phosphorites)/base, Ticheloven bed sediment changes from sand to clay and becomes richer in glauconite (De Vogel, Reference De Vogel1970, Reference De Vogel1971). It is also striking that the maximum grain size (i.e. coarser grain size in the clay) increases considerably (Fig. 6). The holostratotype of the Ticheloven bed is defined in borehole 34G1-1/43T in the municipality of Eibergen (coordinates: x = +89,387 and y = −3,829; Janssen, Reference Janssen1967) (see also the discussion, below).

Biostratigraphy and age

The outcrop Miste-03 has also been examined for its contained palynology. The results of the palynological investigation of interval 1.00–4.00 m are described below (cf. Table 4; also Fig. 7).

Table 4. Overview palynological results including age assessment of the outcrop Miste-03.

The dating is based on: *1. LODs (Last Occurrence Datum) of Cousteaudinium aubryae and Distatodinium spp. at 1.00–1.25 m, LOD of Distatodinium paradoxum at 1.75–2.00 m, LOD of Distatodinium cavatum and FOD (First Occurrence Datum) of Labyrinthodinium truncatum at 2.5–2.8 m.

*2. Remarkable is the number of taxa reworked from the late Oligocene, early Chattian with representatives such as: Deflandrea phosphoritica, Dinopterigium spp., Wetzeliella gochtii and Wetzeliella symmetrica. Some species even have a LOD in the earliest Miocene, Aquitanian, such as Chiropteridium galea and Homotryblium vallum, but also occur in the early Chattian. However, these chronostratigraphic ranges do not fit with the FOD of Sumatradinium druggii (late Burdigalian, Zone SNSM4, or younger) for example.

Figure 7. Palynological interpretation and distribution chart of the Miste-03 outcrop.

The palynological yield is very high, with marine dinoflagellate cysts dominating the microfloral spectrum. From 2.5–2.8 m upwards to 1.5–1.75 m, the marine content of the total sum of palynomorphs increases. Among the sporomorphs, the bisaccate pollen (gymnosperms) are dominant. Reworking is absent or very modest, with the exception of the base. At the basal sample 3.75–4.00 m, the percentage is at least 5%. In any case, the origin of most reworking is early Chattian.

Lithostratigraphic position and distribution

The Miste Bed occurs in the region of Miste (Fig. 1) and extends southwards into Germany. Elsewhere, in Barlo, Lievelde, Overkamp Meddo boreholes and that further north as far as Twente, the Miste Bed is absent and the Ticheloven bed occurs at the base of the Aalten Member. Remarkably, the phosphorites in the Miste Bed are always recorded as eroded at the base. Hence, the Miste Bed is older than the initially defined Ticheloven bed and the nature of the transition merits reintroduction of the latter.

The amended Eibergen Member and the new Dale member

In the Achterhoek, there has been a problem with the lithostratigraphic interpretation of the top of the Eibergen Member for many years. Here, a new Dale member of the Diessen Formation is proposed, sandwiched between the underlying Eibergen Member of the Groote Heide Formation and overlying Zenderen Member, also of the Diessen Formation (see Table 3).

Lithology and facies

The basal part of the Eibergen Member comprises black clays, rich in mica and whale skeletal remains. The succession overlying these black clays comprises greenish silty-sandy clays and clayey silts with fine glauconite, the occurrence of which implies a doubtful interpretation whether this unit is an equivalent of the Zenderen Member or still belongs to the Eibergen facies. Advancing insight over the years has indicated more strongly that it represents an as yet (for the Achterhoek) unnamed member overlying the typical black clays of the Eibergen Member. Therefore, here it is proposed to introduce the term Dale member for this interval. The present interval is lithological easily distinguished and recognisable in the RGD (Geological Survey of the Netherlands) borehole Barlo (code B41B0135), interval 49.25–52.25 m (Fig. 8). Here, the base of this new Dale member is clearly visible in the lithological transition from a blackish moderately silty clay (Eibergen Member) to a dark green-grey very strongly clayey silt. The boundary between the Dale and Zenderen Member (Diessen Formation) is determined by an upward gradation from a green-grey strongly clayey silt (Dale) to silts and very fine sands (Zenderen Member). A sharp upward decrease of the gamma-ray values from the Eibergen Member towards relatively low values that characterise the Dale member can be seen in Fig. 8.

Figure 8. Palynological interpretation and distribution chart of the Barlo borehole (B41B0135).

Biostratigraphy and age

New palynological analyses have been performed to confirm the current stratigraphic interpretation (Fig. 8). The palynological results from the Barlo borehole (B41B0135) are shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Summary of the palynological results regarding age assessment of the Barlo borehole (B41B0135).

The dating is based on: *1. LODs of Labyrinthodinium truncatum, Hystrichosphaeropsis obscura and Systematophora placacantha and the FODs of Impagidinium densiverrucosum and Selenopemphix armageddonensis.

*2. LOD of Palaeocystodinium golzowense.

*3. LOD of 1 (badly preserved) taxon Cannosphaeropsis passio. Remarks: Cannosphaeropsis passio is possibly reworked here.

*4. LOD of Cannosphaeropsis passio.

*5. The occurrence of Cerebrocysta poulsenii.

The palynological results indicate a late Serravallian age (biozones SNSM10 and SNSM11) for the uppermost part of the Eibergen Member and an earliest Tortonian age for the Dale member (boundary Zone SNSM11/12).

Lithostratigraphic position and distribution

The Dale member has not been established in the boreholes on the East Netherlands Plateau. Here, a major discordance between the Delden Member and underlying succession is shown. The succession here includes many shark teeth from the eroded section of the early Delden Member. The current strata outcrop immediately west of Winterswijk, in the ‘t Klooster forest, where the current transition is exposed. The Dale member is confirmed in Barlo borehole and the western part of the transect (Fig. 5).

The lithostratigraphic situation is different in Twente, where the Zenderen Member discordantly overlies a decalcified interval that may be attributed to an equivalent of the Aalten Member. A major hiatus is interpreted to occur here.

Amended Delden and new Doetinchem members

Encouraged by recent positive results of research that clarified the previously uncertain and contested stratigraphic succession of the Kasterlee Formation, sandwiched between the Diest and Mol formations in Belgium, the uppermost part of the Dutch Diessen Formation was once again investigated here in order to achieve a higher lithostratigraphic resolution (Louwye et al., Reference Louwye, De Schepper, Laga and Vandenberghe2007; Louwye & Vandenberghe, Reference Louwye and Vandenberghe2020; Vandenberghe et al., Reference Vandenberghe, Wouters, Schiltz, Beerten, Berwouts, Vos, Houthuys, Deckers, Louwye, Laga, Verhaegen, Adriaens and Dusar2020; Verhaegen et al., Reference Verhaegen, Frederickz and Schiltz2020). Similar lithological observations and trends, such as the higher gamma-ray log values observed at the top of the latter formation, are described below. They have resulted in the establishment of a new lithostratigraphic unit, the Doetinchem member and an amended Delden Member (see discussion below).

Lithology and facies

Evidence obtained from the air-lifted Gaanderen boring show that the 83–96 m interval, here defined as the new Doetinchem member (formerly top part of the Delden Member), consists of a dark green to olive grey loam alternating with silty fine sands and extremely silty clays that are moderately humus (organic matter). Clay and cemented beds are present. Traces of glauconite and iron oxide are also observed. The lithology of the current interval differs from under- and overlying successions that are more continuous sandy. This lithological change is also very prominently visible in the gamma-ray logs, which show overall much higher values for the Doetinchem member. In the Gaanderen boring, the lower boundary of the unit is characterised by a 2-m-thick mollusc-rich bed. These units predominantly reflect marginal to shallow marine sedimentation.

Biostratigraphy and age

The dinoflagellate cyst assemblages from this unit indicates a late Miocene (latest Tortonian-Messinian) age, post-Zone SNSM14 for the Doetinchem member. Labyrinthodinium truncatum is no longer observed here, whilst Impagidinium densiverrucosum (LOD in the late Miocene) is still present. At the base of this unit, abundant simple trilete fern spores are recorded indicating their colonisation of nearby river banks. Although brackish water algae first occur here, they are restricted to low numbers. The coastal marine dinocyst taxon Lingulodinium machaerophorum is also represented in abundance. The Delden Member was equated to the late Tortonian, zones SNSM13-14.

Lithostratigraphic position and distribution

In this paper, the Doetinchem member is presented as the youngest member of the Diessen Formation, formerly being the upper part of the Delden Member. The new unit is (like the former Delden Member) overlain by sediments of the Oosterhout Formation. It is an easily identified in the gamma-ray logs by an evident decrease towards low values upwards. In the western part of the studied area the Doetinchem member grades into the clean sands of the Goirle Member, the letter being associated with characteristic low gamma-ray values. Near Varsseveld, the erosional base increases in the amount of time it represents, and an undifferentiated Oosterhout Formation shows an alternation of sands and silts. Further east, medium-grained sands yielding distinctly low-gamma ray values and a locally highly erosional base form the upper part of the Oosterhout Formation (Lievelde Member, formerly referred to as the Scheemda Formation). In the holostratotype section, the lower boundary of the new unit is on top of 2-m-thick shell bed and underlying succession of fine sands, weakly silty, moderately humic. If the shell bed is absent, a transition from loam to fine sands is present, corresponding to an upward increase in gamma-ray readings towards the Delden Member.

New lectostratotype sections

The holostratotype sections on which present lithostratigraphic units are defined in the Achterhoek have mostly disappeared or sample material of the Miocene-type locality is merely available. Furthermore, the holostratotype sections were drilled with poorly executed straight-flush drillings (cuttings), including a small diameter drill; hence, every lithological detail is missing. Over the past 40 years, advances in understanding and experience developed novel air-lift drilling techniques have increased in-situ sample resolution (Van den Bosch, Reference Van den Bosch2015). In addition, in the past the chronostratigraphical position of the units was interpreted in low resolution (Munsterman, Reference Munsterman2011a, Reference Munsterman2011b). Hence, new lectostratotype sections are proposed in this study and additional palynological analysis for age assessment has been performed on these strata. The type-borings selected are De Haart (B41G0024) and Gaanderen (B40F1874). For information on the lithological description, facies and geographical distribution, the reader is referred to the Addendum (cf. also Figs. 9 and 10 showing the lithological profile of both holes). Here, a summary of the biostratigraphical results from the De Haart and Gaanderen boreholes is compiled.

Figure 9. Lithological section of the De Haart borehole (B41G0024).

Figure 10. Lithological section of the Gaanderen borehole (B40F1874).

Biostratigraphy and age

  1. 1. Borehole De Haart, interval 7–41 m : lectostratotype sections for the Aalten (32.5–41 m), Stemerdink (21–32.5 m), Eibergen (7–21 m) members and Miste (36.5–41 m), Ticheloven (32.5–36.5 m) beds.

Dinoflagellate cyst biozonation

The stratigraphic interpretation and age are shown in Fig. 11 under the columns ‘formation’, ‘member’ and ‘age’. The associations are very rich in well-preserved dinoflagellate cysts. What is striking, however, is the presence of caving from higher successions. Previous and new analytical results of taxa are displayed together (Table 6; Fig. 12).

Table 6. Overview palynological results regarding age assessment borehole De Haart (B41G0024).

The dating is based on: *1. FOD of Cannosphaeropsis passio.

*2. LODs of Imperfectodinium bulbosum & Unipontidinium aquaeductum.

*3. LOD of Palaeocystodinium ventricosum.

*4. LODs of Distatodinium paradoxum and Cousteaudinium aubryae. And the FOD of Unipontidinium aquaeductus.

*5. Superposition and the FODs of Labyrinthodinium truncatum modicum and Labyrinthodinium truncatum truncatum.

*6. LODs of Achilleodinium biformoides, Membranophoridium connectum and Operculodinium xanthium. And the FOD of Distatodinium aff. biffii.

Figure 11. Palynological interpretation of the De Haart borehole. The high peak values in the gamma-ray log at 37.7 m depth are associated with phosphorites.

Figure 12. Palynological distribution chart of the De Haart borehole.

Mollusc biozones

The successive molluscan zones from the Aalten Member in the De Haart borehole correspond closely to the scheme introduced by De Vogel (Reference De Vogel1970, Reference De Vogel1971). The Hiatella arctica zone (39.00–40.00 m b.s.) is succeeded by the Astarte radiata zone (36.50–38.50 m below surface, the uppermost part of which corresponds to the LOD of Tritia facki), Spisula zone (33.50–36.00 m. below surface) and Limopsis aurita zone (29.00–33.50 m b.s.). Within the Spisula zone, the most common species in sample 35.00–35.50 is L. aurita; nevertheless, the common occurrence of Spisula aff. subtruncata within this interval led the writers to attribute the sample to the Spisula zone. The most common species in the lowermost sample in the De Haart borehole (40.50–41.00 m b.s.) is L. aurita, leaving the authors uncertain of the attribution to the molluscan biozones proposed by De Vogel (Reference De Vogel1970, Reference De Vogel1971). The molluscan succession corresponds to the regional Oxlundian Substage that has been attributed to the global Langhian Stage (Janssen, Reference Janssen2001).

The molluscan abundances are provided for the De Haart borehole (this work) and those at Miste, De Vlijt and Stemerdink in Table 7. The new De Haart evidence (Fig. 13) shows a succession of four mollusc acme zones identical to the successions described by De Vogel (Reference De Vogel1971). The lowest acme zone, characterised by common Hiatella arctica, is found in the base of the Miste borehole (1.75–4.10 m below surface) in the base of Stemerdink borehole (17.00–18.90 m below surface) and in borehole De Haart (39.00–41.00 m below surface). The overlying Astarte radiata acme zone has been encountered in all four studied boreholes (Miste: 1.60–1.75 m b.s.; De Haart: 36.50–38.50 m below surface; De Vlijt: 49.50–51.00 m below surface; Stemerdink: 13.00–17.00 m below surface). Within this acme zone, a Last Occurrence Date (LOD) of Tritia facki is found. The overlying Spisula aff. subtruncata acme zone is found in De Haart (33.50–35.00 m below surface), De Vlijt (47.00–49.50 m below surface) and Stemerdink (11.00–13.00 m below surface). The uppermost Limopsis aurita acme zone also occurs in these three boreholes (De Haart: 29.00–33.50 m below surface), De Vlijt (42.00–47.00 m below surface) and Stemerdink (6.00–11.00 m below surface).

Table 7. Molluscan abundances provided for the De Haart/Langeler borehole (this work) and boreholes Miste, De Vlijt and Stemerdink. L = borehole De Haart/Langeler 41G.1-94, S = Stemerdink borehole 41E.4-387 (De Vogel, Reference De Vogel1971), M = Miste borehole 41E.3-75 (De Vogel, Reference De Vogel1971), DV = De Vlijt borehole 41D.2-7 (De Vogel, Reference De Vogel1971). *This taxon contains likely additional taxa of ribbed Dentalium species (J. van der Voort, personal communication).

Figure 13. Correlation of molluscan zones from 4 successions in the Groote Heide Formation, Aalten and Stemerdink members. De Vlijt: the farm “De Vlijt”, De Haart, Aalten. Note the “De Vlijt”quarry. Stemerdink is located in Brinkheurne, Winterswijk.

Gaanderen Borehole, interval 83–168.5 m: new holo- and lectostratotype sections (Table 8)

Dinoflagellate cyst biozones

The stratigraphical interpretation and age are represented in Fig. 14 under the columns ‘formation’, ‘member’ and ‘age’. The previous and new palynological analysis results are shown integrated (Fig. 15). The top of the succession, interval 21–47 m (four samples), is poor in palynomorphs, and their preservation is poor. From 50 m and deeper, the associations are rich and well preserved. The palynological results from the Gaanderen borehole (B40F1874) are shown in Table 9.

Table 8. New holo- and lectostratotype sections for the members of the Diessen Formation.

Table 9. Overview age assessment of the Gaanderen borehole (B40F1874), based on palynology.

The dating is based on: *1. The sample slides are poor in palynomorphs. Some sporomorphs are present and occasionally rare dinocysts (including fragments). Spiniferites and bisaccates (gymnosperms), are all ‘of long-term chronostratigraphic range’ and are not specific to dating. The presence of dinoflagellate cysts indicates marine influence.

*2. LODs of Selenopemphix armageddonensis and Reticulatosphaera actinocoronata (ca. 4.5 Ma) and FODs of Operculodinium tegillatum and Ataxiodinium choane (ca. 6.6 Ma).

*3. LOD of Impagidinium densiverrucosum.

*4. LODs of Hystrichosphaeropsis obscura, Sumatradinium soucouyantae, ?Gramocysta verricula and Labyrinthodinium truncatum.

*5. LOD of Systematophora placacantha and FOD of Selenopemphix armageddonensis.

*6. LOD of Palaeocystodinium golzowense.

*7. LOD of Cannosphaeropsis passio and FOD of Cannosphaeropsis passio.

*8. Superposition and FOD of Achomosphaera andalousiensis.

Figure 14. Palynological interpretation of the Gaanderen borehole.

Figure 15. Palynological distribution chart of the Gaanderen borehole.

Discussion

Fossiliferous successions of the Aalten and the base of the Stemerdink members

The fossiliferous successions in the Achterhoek in general represent a fining-up sequence, but especially the lateral and vertical distribution of the Spisula aff. subtruncata and Limopsis aurita acme zones are not distributed congruently with the lithological transitions (De Vogel, Reference De Vogel1971; Janssen, Reference Janssen1984). The base of the Miocene succession in the Miste area overlies an unconformable contact the Rupelian Boom clays and contains rounded (reworked) phosphoritic pebbles and nodules containing Chattian and Early- and reworked Middle Miocene taxa (Fig. 6; Janssen, Reference Janssen1984). The transition to the Hiatella arctica-Astarte radiata zone is considered to represent an hiatus (Fig. 13; Janssen, Reference Janssen1984) known as the Ticheloven horizon. The layer contains quartz and phosphorites with reworked faunal material, but based on its palynological content all lie within the M5 biozone (Fig. 11). The short Ticheloven borehole (34G.1-24, de Vogel, Reference De Vogel1971) located outside the study area has been used to define this horizon. In this borehole, three acme zones have been found. From bottom to top, they are the Astarte radiata acme zone (3.00–4.15 m below surface), the Spisula aff. subtruncata acme zone (1.75–3.00 m below surface) and the Limopsis aurita acme zone (0.80–1.75 m below surface).

Apart from the unconformity at the transition of the Hiatella arctica-Astarte radiata zone, that possibly represents subaerial exposure, depositional depths must have been below storm wave base (given the occurrence of paired bivalves and common very fine preservation) and below the photic zone (given the near-absence of grazers, such as cerithid gastropods). However, given the common occurrence of byssus bivalves, combined with the very high species numbers, it is likely that the waters were clear. The molluscan faunal association is typical of euhaline salinities (Janssen, Reference Janssen1984). Overall, the character of the Miste fauna is subtropical, given the very high species numbers (501 species according to Janssen, Reference Janssen1984), including several groups that are considered as tropical (such as conid, olivid and terebrid gastropods). The majority of the recovered species are known only from the Miocene of the North Sea Basin, indicating a relatively high degree of prolonged isolation. Several species, however, are known from Middle Miocene deposits of the Aquitaine Basin and some from the Paratethys Basin (Janssen, Reference Janssen1984). This is also seen in the fish-otolith faunas from the same Miocene beds (Schwarzhans, Reference Schwarzhans2010).

Based on this evidence, it is possible that following deposition of fine sand, including rich fauna (Miste Bed), the climate cooled at the end of the mid-Miocene climate optimum, MCO approximately 15 Ma), and hence the coastline became more proximal (coarse grains are mainly transported along the coasts, near the surf zone). The Ticheloven bed represents a subsequent transgression showing, apart from the lithological changes described above (‘lithology and facies reintroduction Ticheloven bed’), a gradually increasing bathymetry towards the overlying Stemerdink member. This increase in water depth is reflected in the fining of the grain size the impact of which is also indicated in the resistivity log of the De Haart borehole. The number of both faunal species and individuals decreases sharply upwards, these changes again being a response to an increase in water depth.

Unconformities

The recently distinguished Groote Heide and Diessen formations are bounded by regional discontinuities viz. the Early-, Mid- and Late-Miocene unconformities (EMU, MMU and LMU). The EMU coincides with the base of the Groote Heide Formation, whilst the MMU occurs at the boundary between the Groote Heide and Diessen formations and the LMU is present at the top of the Diessen Formation (Fig. 5). Munsterman et al. (Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019) show that both the EMU and MMU of the southern Netherlands correlate remarkably well with the same-named hiati in the Netherlands offshore sector, and in that of the neighbouring countries Belgium, Germany and Denmark (e.g. Kuhlmann et al., Reference Kuhlmann, Langereis, Munsterman, Van Leeuwen, Verreussel, Meulenkamp and Wong2006; Köthe, Reference Köthe2007; Rasmussen and Dybkjær, Reference Rasmussen and Dybkjær2014; Vandenberghe et al., Reference Vandenberghe, Harris, Wampler, Houthuys, Louwye, Adriaens, Vos, Lanckackers, Deckers, Verhaegen, Laga, Westerhoff and Munsterman2014; De Bruin et al., Reference De Bruin, Geel, Houben, Munsterman, Verweij, Smit, Janssen, Kerstholt-Boegehold and Vandeweijer2017). In the Achterhoek study, the Miocene unconformities in the De Haart type-borehole (B41G0024) and Gaanderen (B40F1874) are compared with the lectostratotype in the Groote Heide Formation in Groote Heide borehole (B58F0064) and the Diessen Formation in Goirle borehole (B50H0373) (Figs. 16 and 17).

Figure 16. Panel showing the correlation of the Groote Heide Formation in the De Haart borehole and the Groote Heide type section borehole.

Figure 17. Panel showing the correlation of the Diessen Formation in the Gaanderen borehole and the Goirle type section borehole.

In the Roer Valley Rift System, the EMU is placed between DinoZones M3 and M4, at the boundary between the Veldhoven Formation and Groote Heide Formation (Munsterman et al., Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019). In the Achterhoek area, the Veldhoven Formation is absent and the Groote Heide Formation directly overlies the Rupelian Rupel Formation. A similar situation occurs further south in northern Belgium, where at Zonderschot the glauconitic sands of the lower Langhian Zonderschot Member of the Berchem Formation directly overlies the Rupelian Boom Formation (Louwye, Reference Louwye2000). In fact, the fossil content of the Zonderschot Member is very similar to that of the Miste Bed.

These unconformities generally seem to occur in the North Sea Basin, but their origin and precise ages are still disputed. For example, Rasmussen and Dybkjær (Reference Rasmussen and Dybkjær2014) state that various ages and differentiated hypotheses associated with the origin of the MMU are strongly related to the local tectonic settings. On the Venlo Block, Munsterman et al. (Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019) describe an MMU at the top of Zone 11 (in the Groote Heide borehole at a depth of 156.8–159.8 m, where the palynofacies changes abruptly. This change is expressed by a decrease in the frequency of Paralecaniella from over 60 to 5% of the total marine component, together with the absence of foraminifer Zone FC2B2 (Van Leeuwen, Reference Van Leeuwen2000). The variable regional observations of the MMU interval in the southern North Sea Basin (i.e. the Netherlands), as described in Munsterman et al. (Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019), seem to be related to the proximal-distal position within the basin and indicate that the MMU is a local expression of an interaction between tectonics and climate on deposition during a phase intermediate between a Maximum Flooding Surface (MFS) at boundary Zone SNSM 7/8; (roughly mid-Serravallian in age) and a Maximum Regressive Surface at the top Zone SNSM 11 (approximately at the Serravallian/Tortonian boundary). In part, it may be related to a convergent phase between tectonic plates (the African Plate, the Arabian Plate and the Indian Plate from the south, and the Eurasian Plate from the north), resulting in long-distance regional structural effects.

The palynological analysis of the Late Miocene succession in the Roer Valley Graben (RVG, southern Netherlands) does not reveal an undisputable hiatus (i.e. the top of the Diessen Formation) associated with the LMU (Munsterman et al., Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019). This is in contrast to its occurrence in the Dutch and German offshore North Sea settings (Benvenuti et al., Reference Benvenuti, Kombrink, Ten Veen, Munsterman, Bardi and Benvenuti2012; Köthe et al., Reference Köthe, Gaedicke and Lutz2008), where part of the Tortonian and Messinian is absent. However, in the RVG a sudden change in depositional style is suggested by both lithological and gamma-ray shifts in the top of the Diessen Formation. These trends are very similar to those observed in the Achterhoek (cf. LMU- top Doetinchem member in the Gaanderen borehole, Fig. 17: gamma-ray decline to lower values, indicating a transition towards clean, early Zanclean ‘Goirle-type’ sands). The low palynological content of these deposits could be explained by weathering oxidation processes, that is, subaerial exposure, and hence be representative of an hiatus. On the seismic profile, all the topset bed facies are missing, potentially indicating at least a ‘limited’ hiatus coinciding approximately with the local Miocene/Pliocene boundary (Munsterman et al., Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019).

Sequences and correlation

The underlying strata of the Groote Heide Formation in the Achterhoek are dated to the late Rupelian Zone O5a, suggesting important erosion in the area prior to the late Burdigalian–Langhian Stage transition. Subsequently, sedimentation resumed during the late Burdigalian (Zone M4)–Langhian (Zone M5) transgression, with reworking of the early Chattian-earliest Miocene deposits, the latter based upon the macro- and microfossil content at the base of the Aalten Member (Fig. 18). Likewise, the EMU at the base of the Groote Heide Formation (Aalten Member, Miste Bed) in the De Haart borehole is associated with an even more pronounced hiatus stretching up to the Savian Phase, comprising the Chattian-early Miocene interval, compared to the lectostratotype section in the Venlo Graben (Fig. 16). Based on grain size and resistivity log patterns, a coarsening upward trend from the base of the Miste Bed is seen. This coarsening upward ends in an hiatus at the base of the Ticheloven bed according to molluscan analyses; however, it is not indicated by dinoflagellate cyst assemblage in this study, recording continued deposition during the M5 Zone. Transgression and fining upwards follows within the Langhian Stage Ticheloven bed and Stemerdink member. Deepening of the basin is indicated by the fauna, grain size and an upward decrease in resistivity values. A MFS is recorded at the Stemerdink/Eibergen Member transition at the lower M7 biozone (Fig. 11). This MFS is not found in the Groote Heide Formation further south in the RVRS (Fig. 16). This possibly reflects the greater sediment input in the south-eastern part of the Netherlands, compared to the Achterhoek, where all successions are much more fine-grained (clay). The MFS at the boundary Zone SNSM 7/8 (approximately mid-Serravallian in age) in the RVRS is also established in the Achterhoek, such as in De Haart borehole within the Eibergen Member at c. 15 m (Fig. 16). After this MFS, a coarsening upward sequence occurs and this continues in the Eibergen Member which is devoid of mollusc shells.

Figure 18. Schematic cross-section of the Oligocene-Pliocene lithostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy from the south-eastern part (Germany; basin margin) to the northern part (the Netherlands; basin centre) of the RVG, and the Achterhoek and Antwerp area (s.l. Campine & City; basin margin). The lithostratigraphy is modified after Deckers & Louwye (Reference Deckers and Louwye2019), Van Adrichem Boogaert and Kouwe (1993–1997) and Munsterman et al. (Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019). The Antwerp (City and Campine) area is adjusted after Vandenberghe & Louwye (Reference Vandenberghe and Louwye2020) and Everaert et al. (Reference Everaert, Munsterman, De Schutter, Bosselaers, Van Boeckel, Cleemput and Bor2020).

Similar to the Venlo Graben, the uppermost part of the Groote Heide Formation comprises the largest part of the M11 biozone, and the base of the superjacent Diessen Formation, the M12 biozone. Thus, here there is no major hiatus associated with the MMU, although a major facies change, with an upward decrease in gamma-ray values, similar to that boreholes in the northern Roer Valley Graben (Fig. 18) is present. Overall, the lithology of the Diessen Formation is much coarser than that of the Groote Heide Formation in this area, an observation which is consistent with that recorded in the southern Netherlands and neighbouring Belgium. An exception is the newly introduced Dale member in the basal part of the Diessen Formation, which is lithologically similar to that of the subjacent Groote Heide Formation. The Late Miocene age of the Diessen Formation is very similar to that in the northern Roer Valley Graben (Fig. 18; Munsterman et al., Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019). In the boreholes at Gaanderen and Barlo, the uppermost part of the Groote Heide Formation was deposited within the SNSM 11 biozone and the basal part of the Diessen Formation, the SNSM12 biozone (Figs. 8 and 14). Also in borehole Groote Heide, the MMU is situated at the transition between both biozones. Frequently, several zones from the (late) Serravallian are found to be absent, and this hiatus is being associated with the MMU. This is the case in the De Haart borehole zones M9–M10 (Fig. 16) and in that in the Goirle borehole zones M7–M10 (Fig. 17). In addition, the MMU often corresponds to a peak in the gamma-ray plots towards lower values (CF. MMU in both borings in Fig. 17).

The Diessen Formation shows a coarsening upwards from the Zenderen towards the Delden members, based on the granulometry and gamma-ray log of the Gaanderen borehole (Figs. 10 and 14). This coarsening upward trend ends abruptly at the boundary between the Delden and Doetinchem members. The latter shows high gamma-ray values. A very similar log-pattern can be locally seen in northern Belgium, such as in the Turnhout borehole (GSB 017e0398), where the Diest Formation, the equivalent of the Diessen Formation, passes upwards into the Kasterlee Formation, the equivalent of the Doetinchem member. Based on palynologically controlled correlation, the nearby Oud-Turnhout borehole, the high-gamma-ray interval was interpreted by Louwye et al. (Reference Louwye, Deckers, Verhaegen, Adriaens and Vandenberghe2020) as belonging to the Kasterlee Formation, having a latest Miocene (DN10 biozone, Fig. 4) age. A very similar age for the Doetinchem member is established by this study. Moreover, the lithology is quite similar, with both units including olive-grey to green-grey, clayey or silty sands. In the Doetinchem member, the base comprises a shell bed, whereas that of the Kasterlee Formation is represented by a gravel stratum. In the Belgian Oud-Turnhout borehole, the Kasterlee Formation is overlain by the Upper Pliocene (Piacenzian) Poederlee Formation, indicating the presence of a 2.5 Ma hiatus (Louwye and De Schepper, Reference Louwye and De Schepper2010). This hiatus can be related to the LMU, which is also found in the southern Netherlands based mainly on seismic investigations (Munsterman et al., Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019). In the Gaanderen borehole, this hiatus is shorter since the earliest Pliocene overlies the Doetinchem member (Fig. 14).

Houthuys et al. (Reference Houthuys, Adriaens, Goolaeerts, Laga, Louwye, Matthijs, Vandenberghe and Verhaegen2020) describe the top of the Belgian Diest Formation, deposited during the late Tortonian, Zone DN9 (Fig. 4). It is characterised by the atypical presence of Fe-vermiculite derived from altered glauconite-bearing soil, thus representing subaerial exposure (Adriaens and Vandenberghe, Reference Adriaens and Vandenberghe2020). This regression marks the boundary between the Diest and the Kasterlee formations (Fig. 18). The overlying clayey Kasterlee Formation is also dated as latest Tortonian-Messinian, biochron DN10 (Fig. 4). The transition between the formations is marked by lithological change and is conspicuously noted on the gamma-ray logs by a shift towards higher values. The facies of the Kasterlee Formation is interpreted as sublittoral, compared to the Diest Formation in a somewhat shallower marine environment. There is also evidently a short erosional phase followed by a new transgression between both formations with reworking of Diest Formation sediment at the base of the Kasterlee Formation. Kasterlee Formation itself records the final Miocene regression (as demonstrated by palaeogeographic interpretation of Verhaegen et al. (Reference Verhaegen, Frederickz and Schiltz2020).

In the present study, the transition from the Delden to the Doetinchem members, at the top of Zone M14, correlates stratigraphically to the boundary Zone DN9/DN10 (Fig. 4) of the Belgian Diest and Kasterlee formations in the Eastern Campine Area (Fig. 18; Louwye and Vandenberghe, Reference Louwye and Vandenberghe2020). In addition, the lithology of the Doetinchem member also differs from both under- and overlying Dutch units that are more continuously sandy (Fig. 14). The lithological changes at the boundary of the current lithostratigraphic units in Belgium and the Netherlands are also demonstrable on the basis of gamma-ray logs. The latter showing overall much higher values in the younger units, that is, the Kasterlee Formation and Doetinchem member, as compared to the underlying older Diest Formation and Delden Member. Although this had not yet been described in Munsterman et al. (Reference Munsterman, Ten Veen, Menkovic, Deckers, Witmans, Verhaegen, Kerstholt-Boegehold, Van de Ven and Busschers2019), the same trend at the top of the Dutch Diessen Formation can be seen in the gamma-ray log in the type section Goirle borehole (Fig. 17). Here, the gamma-ray values shift towards higher values at 161 m depth (Fig. 17). Here, the associated lithological change corresponds to an increase in clay strata. Hence, the Dutch equivalent of the Belgian Kasterlee Formation corresponds to the top interval 151–161 m in the Diessen Formation type section (total defined interval 151–272 m) in the Goirle borehole (B50H0373) and to the Doetinchem member in the Achterhoek. The progressive shallowing of the environment in the latest Miocene apparently resulted in a north-westwards migration of the fluvial Inden and Kieseloölite formations in the south-eastern RVRS (Fig. 18). Fluvial deposits are more difficult to correlate with marine successions, although marine incursions into the Inden Formation are dated up to Zone M14 (late Tortonian), demonstrating correlation of this unit to the Delden Member (Munsterman, Reference Munsterman2013). Louwye and Vandenberghe (Reference Louwye and Vandenberghe2020) also demonstrate a late Tortonian, Zone DN9 age for the Inden Formation in the Maaseik borehole (Roer Valley Graben) and a Messinian age for the Kieseloölite Formation. The Doetinchem member (post-Zone 14) is the chronostratigraphic equivalent to the base of the fluvial Kieseloölite Formation in the SE Netherlands (Fig. 18).

Conclusions

Based on the lithological, biostratigraphical and petrophysical analyses of the newly selected holo- and lectostratotype sections from boreholes that penetrate the Miocene in the eastern part of the Netherlands, it is concluded that:

  1. 1. Cross-border, interregional correlation has yielded a consistent framework of the regional Neogene lithostratigraphy.

  2. 2. The Aalten (including Miste and Ticheloven beds), Stemerdink, Eibergen, Zenderen, Delden and Doetinchem members fit into the recently revised lithostratigraphic classification (Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands, online) and are a significant improvement over the former holostratotype sections.

  3. 3. The base of the Aalten Member is bounded by an hiatus that extends upwards to the Savian phase and the EMU. At the base of the Miste Bed, relatively high values (approximately 5% of the total sum dinoflagellate cysts) of reworking have been recorded from the early Chattian-early Miocene interval.

  4. 4. The Ticheloven bed is lithological a clearly distinguishable unit and the term is reintroduced here.

  5. 5. The Stemerdink Bed is changed to the Stemerdink member, because its thickness of 12 m exceeds the definition of a bed. It is split from the Aalten Member.

  6. 6. Lithostratigraphical problems with the top of the Eibergen and the base of the Zenderen members in the Achterhoek are resolved by revision of the Eibergen Member and the introduction of a new Dale member.

  7. 7. The Dale member is defined here, interbedded between underlying Eibergen and overlying Zenderen members. The holostratotype section is selected in Gaanderen borehole, and palynological analysis confirms its age assessment as early Tortonian. The transition from the Eibergen Member to the Dale member coincides with the MMU.

  8. 8. The Delden Member is amended to become restricted to the occurrence of fine sands.

  9. 9. At the top of the Miocene succession, a new Doetinchem member is established. It is characterised by green-grey to brownish loam, which is mirrored by an increase in gamma-ray log values, compared to over- and underlying sandy units. The unit is associated with the Belgian Kasterlee Formation. The top of the Doetinchem member is limited by the LMU.

  10. 10. The three oldest members in this study, the Aalten (including the Miste and Ticheloven beds), Stemerdink and the Eibergen members are included within the new Groote Heide Formation.

  11. 11. The youngest four units, the Dale, Zenderen, Delden and Doetinchem members, fall within the new Diessen Formation.

Acknowledgements

The authors specially thank Nico Janssen (TNO) and Malcolm Jones (ex-PLS- UK) for the palynological sample preparation. Susan Kerstholt-Boegehold (ex-TNO) is acknowledged for her share of the dinoflagellate cyst analysis over the years. We are indebted to Mr. J. van der Voort (Ostercappeln, Germany) for updating the nomenclature and critical reading of molluscan sections of this manuscript. Johan ten Veen (TNO) is appreciated for his lithostratigraphic discussion and his seismic study of the eastern Netherlands. The members of the Dutch Stratigraphical Commission are thanked for discussion and for embracing the proposal of update and revision of the lithostratigraphy in the eastern part of the country in 2022. We wish to express our extraordinary gratitude to Ed F. de Vogel and Arie W. Janssen, both of whom died in 2021. Arie Janssen was the main driver of the Miste excavations and the expert on the molluscan faunas from the Miocene of the region, whilst Ed De Vogel made very important early studies of the successions and biostratigraphy zonation of the Miocene successions. He was deeply involved in this study. Nik Trabucho (TNO) is gratefully recognised for his help in composing and improving the figures. We also express our gratitude to Jef Deckers (Flemish Institute for Technical Research), Jasper Verhaegen (Department of Environment of the Flemish Government) and an anonymous reviewer who improved the manuscript. Jef Deckers is also much appreciated for his cooperation in the updating of the schematic cross-section graphics, in part of the Antwerp area (Figure 18). Phil Gibbard (University of Cambridge) is highly appreciated for improving (the English in) the final manuscript. Rick Donselaar (University of Delft) is acknowledged for his help on parts of the text and his assistance as an associate editor of the Netherlands Journal of Geosciences.

Addendum: proposed lithostratigraphical definitions for the Miocene of the eastern Netherlands

Aalten Member (Fig. 9)

Status

Formal (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975). Amended (this paper): classified as member in newly defined Groote Heide Formation, new lectostratotype section assigned. The Stemerdink unit is split of the member.

Lithological description

The Aalten Member starts at the base with a blackish sand with many molluscs, increasing glauconite content and increasing grain size upwards over a few metres, passing into clay with a high glauconitic content and coarser quartz grains. Further upwards, the glauconite and quartz sand content are decreasing to the top, changing into fatty clay. The succession is calcareous.

Depositional setting

Shallow near shore marine conditions.

Definition of lower boundary

Discordant contact (Savian phase and possibly also including the ‘Early-Miocene Unconformity’) from dark black-green glauconitic clay with shells (Miste Beds) to shallow marine dark grey clay and loam (Rupel Formation and local Veldhoven Formation). A lot of Chattian-early Miocene reworking was recorded at the base.

Definition of upper boundary

Sharp transition from a fatty, calcareous open-marine clay (traces of molluscs) to calcareous, silty layered brownish-grey clay (Stemerdink member).

Thickness indication

Ca. 3–8 m.

Geographical distribution

Achterhoek

Regional correlation

UK: absent; Germany: Formation of Ville; Belgium: Berchem and Bolderberg formations.

Age

Late Early-early Mid Miocene, late Burdigalian-Langhian. In any case, a lot of reworking with an origin from Chattian-early Miocene is recorded at the base of the Miste Bed.

Holostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Well 41E.3-67 (coördinates: +85.935, −25.025)

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval 16.0–20.8 m (4.8 m)

Lectostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Boring B41G0024, De Haart (coördinates: 241020, 436702 (RD))

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval 32.5–40.5 m (8 m)

Origin of name

Named after Aalten, a municipality in the east of the Dutch province of Gelderland, located near the German border.

Previous name(s)

None

Miste Bed

Status

Formal (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975). Amended (Munsterman & Van den Bosch, Reference Munsterman and Van den Bosch2021): classified as bed in newly defined Groote Heide Formation, new lectostratotype section assigned. Ticheloven bed has been reintroduced and split off at the top.

Lithological description

Miste always consists of sand, with increasing glauconite and coarser grain content upwards, but also a bit more clayey. Very molluscs-rich, in particular at the base. Glauconite, fossil-rich, ‘bed’ of shells forms the base of the Aalten Member, including a lot of reworking from Chattian-early Miocene. Horizon with phosphorite concretions near the apex.

Depositional setting

Warm shallow marine conditions (Van den Berg et al., 2000).

Definition of lower boundary

Discordant contact (Savian phase, possibly including ‘Early-Miocene Unconformity’) from dark black-green glauconitic sand with molluscs (Miste Bed) to shallow marine dark grey clay and loam (Rupel Formation and local Veldhoven Formation). Late Oligocene, Chattian-early Miocene reworking was recorded at the base.

Definition of upper boundary

The lithology changes to clay and is less glauconite rich (minor). Maximum grain size increases (Ticheloven bed). Mollusc fauna is changing, especially the many Gastropods have disappeared and been replaced by large bivalves such as Glycymeris and Arctica islandica.

Thickness indication

Up to 4–5 m.

Geographical distribution

Very locally (Miste and south towards the German border) in the Achterhoek (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975).

Regional correlation

UK: absent; Germany: Formation of Ville; Belgium: Berchem and Bolderberg formations

Age

Late Early-early Middle Miocene, late Burdigalian-early Langhian

Holostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Well 41E.3-75, Miste (coördinates: +87.880, Y = −24.000).

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval: 1.25–4.10 m (2.85 m).

Lectostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Boring B41G0024, De Haart (coördinaten: 241020, 436702 (RD));

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval: 36.5–41 m (4.5 m).

Origin of name

Miste is a hamlet in the municipality of Winterswijk, Gelderse Achterhoek, the Netherlands.

Previous name(s)

None

Ticheloven bed

Status

New. Formal (Munsterman & Van den Bosch Reference Munsterman and Van den Bosch2021): reintroduced bed belonging to the Aalten Member, assigned new lectostratotype.

Lithological description

Dark grey-green to dark green-brown strong silty to sandy clay, changing into highly clayey and sandy loam. Few shells and glauconite are present. Usually glauconite-rich clay (= depending on the proximity of the coast), but for example in well Overkamp, there is a shell-rich sand with coarse glauconite present (= along the paleo-coast).

Depositional setting

Shallow marine.

Definition of lower boundary

Transition from strongly silty to sandy clay to strongly clayey sand with a phosphorite bed (Miste Bed) in the proximity and an increase in the number of gastropods.

Definition of upper boundary

Diffuse transition to shallow marine, clayey sand and clay (Stemerdink member). Maximum grain size (minimum values gamma-ray log, end of trend to lower values). Sometimes, sharply discordant contact with fluvioglacial gravel (Schaarsbergen Member, Drenthe Formation).

Thickness indication

Up until 4–5 m.

Geographical distribution

Common occurrence in Achterhoek (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975).

Regional correlation

UK: absent; Germany: Formation of Ville; Belgium: Berchem and Bolderberg formations.

Age

middle Miocene, Langhian.

Holostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Well 34G1-1/43T (coördinates: x = +89,387 and y = −3,829; Janssen, 1967).

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval

Lectostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Boring B41G0024, De Haart (coördinates: 241020, 436702 (RD))

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval 32.5–36.5 m (4 m).

Origin of name

The name is derived from the Ticheloven farm, near the manually dug outcrop in the hamlet of Loo near Eibergen. In the 18th and 19th centuries, this was a brickyard.

Previous name(s)

(Upper part of and included in) Miste Bed

Stemerdink member (Fig. 9)

Status

Formal (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975). Amended (in this paper): raised in hierarchy from bed and defined as member in Groote Heide Formation, assigned new lectostratotype section.

Lithological description

Silty layered brownish-grey clay, fatter towards the top with decreasing shell content (deepening sea), calcareous. Minor mica and glauconite are present.

Depositional setting

Shallow marine near-shore conditions.

Definition of lower boundary

Diffuse transition to shallow marine, highly clayey and sandy loam (Ticheloven bed). Decrease in grain size, decrease in sand addition (minimum values gamma-ray log, trend break to higher values).

Definition of upper boundary

Sharp or sudden transition from grey-brown marine clay (with a trace of shells) to blackish non-calcareous, micaceous, shallow marine clay (Eibergen Member). Sharply discordant contact with fluvioglacial gravel (Schaarsbergen Member, Drenthe Formation).

Thickness indication

Until approximately 12 m.

Geographical distribution

Common occurrence in Achterhoek (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975).

Regional correlation

UK: absent; Germany: Ville Formation; Belgium: Berchem and Bolderberg formations.

Age

middle Miocene, Langhian-early Serravallian

Holostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Well 41E.4-566 (coördinates: +93.990, −21.280).

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval 2.3−8.5 m.

Lectostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Well B41G0024, De Haart (coördinates: 241020, 436702 (RD)).

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval 21−32.5 m.

Origin of name

Named after the estate Stemerdink near Winterswijk.

Previous name(s)

None

Eibergen Member (Fig. 9)

Status

Formal (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975). Amended (Munsterman & Van den Bosch Reference Munsterman and Van den Bosch2021). Classified as member in a newly defined Groote Heide Formation, new lectostratotype section assigned (sample material holostratotype is insufficient). The upper part of the Eibergen Member, above the MMU, has been split off into the new Dale member.

Lithological description

Stiff blackish clay, moderately silty, glistening. Beds of very fine, low-glauconitic sand and loam. Decalcification of sand due to solution immediately after deposition. In the Achterhoek: stiff, mostly black clay with a high content of organic matter, strongly micaceous, silty beds in which little fine glauconite, a few metres above the base a very fine-sandy, somewhat greenish bed. Almost completely non-calcareous, microfossils are rare.

Depositional setting

Shallow marine near-shore conditions. The origin of the organic matter is unclear (detritus washed in from the hinterland or remains of seaweed?). A manatee was discovered in the type locality of the Eibergen Member, which live on ‘kelp forests’. Virtually no benthic fauna, but bones of whales and large sharks.

Definition of lower boundary

Sharp transition to shallow marine calcareous clay. The Stemerdink member is about 10 to 15 m thick and is sharply distinguished at the top from Eibergen Member. This is immediately recognisable in boreholes: about a metre above the base of the Eibergen Member there is a striking sandy bed, this deposit is mostly completely non-calcareous. In contrast, the top of the Stemerdink Bed is always very calcareous and a much fatter clay, in particular westward. The gamma-ray log image shows a trend towards lower values.

Definition of upper boundary

Transition from black clay with a lot of mica, to greenish silty-sandy clay and clayey silts with fine glauconite (Dale member). The erosive contact is associated with the ‘Mid-Miocene Unconformity’.

Thickness indication

Approx. 14 m.

Geographical distribution

Limited to eastern Netherlands (Achterhoek and Twente; Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975).

Regional correlation

UK: absent; Germany: Ville Formation; Belgium: Berchem and Bolderberg formations.

Age

middle Miocene, late Langhian- Serravallian.

Holostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Well 34G.3-13 (coördinates: +88.100, −11.640)

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval 0–8.50 m

Lectostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Well B41G0024, De Haart (coördinates: 241020, 436702 (RD))

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval 7–21 m (14 m).

Origin of name

Eibergen (Low Saxon: ‘Eibarge’) is a place in the municipality of Berkelland in the Achterhoek, province of Gelderland. The village of Eibergen is located along the small river Berkel, which flows into the Netherlands east of Eibergen and continuing onto the IJssel in Zutphen.

Previous name(s)

None

Dale member (Fig. 10)

Status

New. Formal (Present paper).

Lithological description

Dark grey-green clayey silt changing into green-grey silty clay, much glimmer and with little fine glauconite, non-calcareous.

Depositional setting

Near coastal, shallow marine conditions

Definition of lower boundary

Transition from greenish clayey silt/silty clay with minor fine glauconite, to black clay with a lot of mica (Eibergen Member). The erosive contact is associated with the ‘Mid-Miocene Unconformity’.

Definition of upper boundary

Erosive contact with shallow marine sand (Zenderen Member). Lithological transition from silty clay to sandy loam/silt to very fine sand.

Thickness indication

Up to 9 m

Geographical distribution

Limited to eastern Netherlands (Achterhoek and Twente; Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975).

Regional correlation

UK: absent; Germany: Inden Formation; Belgium: Diest Formation (p.p.)

Age

Late Miocene, early Tortonian

Holostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Well B40F1874, Gaanderen (coördinates: 219990, 439748 (RD))

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval 160–168.5 m (8.5 m).

Origin of name

Dale is a hamlet in the Achterhoek municipality of Aalten, in the Dutch province of Gelderland. ‘Dale’ means valley. The hamlet is located at the low end of the western slope of the East Netherlands Plateau.

Previous name(s)

None

Zenderen Member (Fig. 10)

Status

Formal (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975). Amended (Munsterman & Van den Bosch, Reference Munsterman and Van den Bosch2021). Classified as member in a newly defined Diessen Formation, assigned new lectostratotype section.

Lithological description

Loam at the base, moderately humous, weakly sandy, changing to dark green extremely fine to moderately fine sand (63–210 µm), weakly silty, glauconitic, mostly non-calcareous.

Depositional setting

Near coastal, shallow marine conditions

Definition of lower boundary

Erosive contact with green silty-sandy clay, firm, moderately silty, lot of mica and fine glauconite. (Dale member, Diessen Formation). Often large shift to high values on the gamma-ray log.

Definition of upper boundary

Often, discordant contact with shallow marine, consolidated cohesive fine sands (Delden Member) or with various Quaternary units. The gamma-ray values are significantly lower in the Zenderen Member.

Thickness indication

Until 50 m.

Geographical distribution

Limited to eastern Netherlands (Achterhoek and Twente; Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975).

Regional correlation

Germany: Inden Formation; Belgium: Diest Formation (p.p.).

Age

late Miocene, Tortonian.

Holostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Well B28G172 (coördinates: +90.520, +18.240)

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval 16.50–23.46 m (6.96 m)

Lectostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

Well B40F1874, Gaanderen (coördinates: 219990, 439748 (RD))

Depth (thickness) AH: x–x m (x m) below land surface

Interval 120–168.5 m (48.5 m).

Origin of name

Zenderen is the second largest village in the Twente municipality of Borne in the Dutch province of Overijssel.

Previous name(s)

None

Delden Member (Fig. 10)

Status

Formal (Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975). Amended (Present paper). The Doetinchem member is split of at the top. Classified as member in a newly defined Diessen Formation, assigned new lectostratotype section.

Lithological description

Fine sands, weakly silty, moderately humous. Glauconite rich, goethite and phosphorite concretions. The phosphorite nodules (sandstone-like) with shell cores and impressions occur in beds, sometimes hard banks. The goethite consists of ’small coffee beans’ in the coarse to extremely coarse fraction and occurs in beds. Very characteristic is the sudden appearance of the coarse grains in the succession.

Depositional setting

Marginal-shallow marine

Definition of lower boundary

Discordant contact with extremely fine sands, weakly silty, glauconitic, mostly calcareous (Zenderen Member).

Definition of upper boundary

Transition to dark green-grey to brown loam, strongly sandy, and clay, extremely silty. In the holostratotype section, the boundary is on top of 2 m shell bed.

Thickness indication

Up to 30 m

Geographical distribution

Limited to eastern Netherlands (Achterhoek and Twente; Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975).

Regional correlation

Offshore North Sea: absent; UK: absent; Germany: Inden Formation (Schophoven Seam); Belgium: Diest Formation (p.p.).

Age

late Miocene, late Tortonian

Holostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

28G.3-1 (X-coördinates: +89.600; Y-coördinates: +15.790)

Depth (thickness) along hole: x–x m (x m)

Interval 1.40–7.50 (6.10)

Lectostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

B40F1874, Gaanderen (coördinates: 219990, coördinates: −439748 (RD))

Depth (thickness) along hole: x–x m (x m)

Interval 96–120 m (24)

Origin of name

Delden is a small town in the Dutch province of Overijssel. It has been located in the municipality of ‘Hof van Twente’ since January 1, 2001. Before that, Delden was the capital of the Municipality of Delden.

Previous name(s)

None

Doetinchem member (Fig. 10)

Status

New. Formal. Classified as new member in a newly defined Diessen Formation, assigned new holostratotype section

Lithological description

Dark green-grey to brown loam, strongly sandy, and clay, extremely silty. Clay- and cemented beds are present.

Depositional setting

Marginal to shallow marine

Definition of lower boundary

In the holostratotype section, the boundary is on top of 2 m shell bed and underlying succession of fine sands, weakly silty, moderately humous. If the shell bed is absent, a transition from loam to fine sands is present, mirrored by a negative shift on the gamma-ray logs.

Definition of upper boundary

Discordant contact with coarse, molluscs-containing marine sand (Oosterhout Formation). The transition to the Oosterhout Formation coincides with the ‘Late Miocene Unconformity’. The course of the gamma-ray log shows a remarkable jump to lower values.

Thickness indication

Up to 20 m

Geographical distribution

Limited to eastern Netherlands (Achterhoek and Twente; Van den Bosch et al., Reference Van den Bosch, Cadee and Janssen1975).

Regional correlation

Offshore North Sea: absent; UK: absent; Germany: Kieseloölite Formation (Hauptkies Schichten); Belgium: Kasterlee Formation

Age

Late Miocene, latest Tortonian-Messinian.

Holostratotype

Well: NITG-number, name

B40F1874, Gaanderen (coördinates: 219990, coördinates: −439748 (RD))

Depth (thickness) along hole: x–x m (x m)

Interval 83–96 m (13)

Origin of name

Doetinchem is a municipality in the Achterhoek, in the Dutch province of Gelderland. Gaanderen is a village in the municipality of Doetinchem.

Previous name(s)

(Upper part of the) Delden Member

References

Adriaens, R. & Vandenberghe, N., 2020. Quantitative clay mineralogy as a tool for lithostratigraphy of Neogene formations in Belgium: a reconnaissance study. Geologica Belgica 23(3-4): 365378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthonissen, ED, 2012. A new Miocene biostratigraphy for the northeastern North Atlantic: an integrated foraminiferal, bolboformid, dinoflagellate and diatom zonation. Newsletters on Stratigraphy 45(3): 281307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenuti, A., Kombrink, H., Ten Veen, J., Munsterman, D.K., Bardi, F. & Benvenuti, M., 2012. Late Cenozoic shelf delta development and mass transport in the Netherlands offshore area- results of 3D seismic interpretation. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 91(4): 591609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bor, T., Reinecke, T. & Verschueren, S., 2012. Miocene Chondrichthyes from Winterswijk - Miste, the Netherlands. Palaeontos 21.Google Scholar
Bosch, J.A. Standaard boorbeschrijvingsmethode 2000. TNO report, 2000.Google Scholar
Dearing Crampton-Flood, E., Noorbergen, L.J., Smits, D., Boschman, R.C., Donders, T.H., Munsterman, D.K. & Sinninghe Damsté, J.S., 2020. A new age model for the Pliocene of the southern North Sea basin: a multi-proxy climate reconstruction. Climate of the Past 16(2): 523541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckers, J. & Louwye, S., 2019. Late Miocene increase in sediment accommodation rates in the southern North Sea Basin. Geological Journal 55: 728736. DOI: 10/1002/gj.3438.Google Scholar
De Bruin, G., Geel, K., Houben, A., Munsterman, D.K., Verweij, H., Smit, J., Janssen, N., Kerstholt-Boegehold, S.J. & Vandeweijer, V. MMU. Unraveling the stratigraphy and structural development of the strata found underneath and above the Mid-Miocene Unconformity, 2017. TNO report 2017 R10425.Google Scholar
De Schepper, S., Beck, K.M. & Mangerud, G., 2017. Late Neogene dinoflagellate cyst and acritarch biostratigraphy for Ocean Drilling Program Hole 642B, Norwegian Sea. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 236: 1232, DOI 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2016.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Verteuil, L. & Norris, G., 1996. Miocene dinoflagellate stratigraphy and systematics of Maryland and Virginia. Micropaleontology 42: 1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vogel, E.F., 1970. A study of marine Miocene faunas in the “Achterhoek” (Netherlands, Province of Gelderland). Mededelingen Werkgroep voor Tertiaire en Kwartaire Geologie, Part I 7(2): 5378.Google Scholar
De Vogel, E.F., 1971. A study of marine Miocene faunas in the “Achterhoek” (Netherlands, Province of Gelderland). Mededelingen Werkgroep voor Tertiaire en Kwartaire Geologie, Part 2 7(4): 106127 + appendix: 1-26.Google Scholar
Deckers, J. & Munsterman, D.K., 2020. Middle Miocene depositional evolution of the central Roer Valley Rift System. Geological Journal 55(9): 61886197. DOI: 10.1002/gj.3799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckers, J., Vernes, R., Dabekaussen, W., Den Dulk, M., Doornenbal, H., Dusar, M., Matthijs, J., Menkovic, A., Reindersma, R., Walstra, J., Westerhoff, W. & Witmans, N., 2014. Geologisch en hydrogeologisch 3D model van het Cenozoïcum van de Roerdalslenk in Zuidoost-Nederland en Vlaanderen (H3O-Roerdalslenk). VITO-rapport 2014/ETE/R/1. VITO (Mol): 200 pp.Google Scholar
Dybkjær, K. & Rasmussen, E.S., 2000. Palynological dating of the Oligocene – Miocene successions in the Lille Bælt area, Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 47: 87103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybkjær, K. & Piasecki, S., 2010. Neogene dinocyst zonation for the eastern North Sea Basin, Denmark. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 161(1-2): 129. DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybkjaer, K., Rasmussen, Ś., Esbensen, K.K., Mathiesen, K.H. & A, 2018. A palynofacies study of past fluvio-deltaic and shelf environments, the Oligocene-Miocene succession, North Sea Basin: A reference dataset for similar Cenozoic systems. Marine and Petroleum Geology 100: 111147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everaert, S., Munsterman, D.K., De Schutter, P.J., Bosselaers, M., Van Boeckel, J., Cleemput, G. & Bor, T., 2020. Stratigraphy and palaeontology of the Lower Miocene Kiel Sand Member (Berchem Formation) in temporary exposures in Antwerp (northern Belgium). Geologica Belgica 23(3-4): 167199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fensome, R.A., Williams, G.L. & MacRae, R.A., 2019. Lentin and Williams index of fossil dinoflagellates. AASP Contribution Series 50: 1173.Google Scholar
Fensome, R.A. & Munsterman, D.K., 2020. Dinoflagellates (Chapter 3, Evolution and biostratigraphy). In: Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M.D. & Ogg, G.M. (eds): The Geological Time Scale. vol. 2020, 1, p. 99108.Google Scholar
Geluk, M.C., 1998. Toelichting bij kaartblad X Almelo-Winterswijk. Geologische Atlas van de Diepe Ondergrond van Nederland. Netherlands Institute of Applied Geosciences TNO (Haarlem): 145 pp.Google Scholar
Gerth, H., 1955. Die Fossilfuhrung des Jura in den Bohrungen der ‘Rijksopsporing van Delfstoffen’ bei Winterswijk und ihre stratigraphische Bedeutung. Mededelingen Geologische Stichting, N.S. 9: 4554.Google Scholar
Gibbard, PL & Lewin, J., 2016. Filling the North Sea Basin: Cenozoic sediment sources and river styles. Andre Dumont medallist lecture 2014. Geologica Belgica 19(3-4): 201217. DOI: 10.20341/gb.2015.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardenbol, J., Thierry, J., Farley, M.B., Jacquin, Th, De Graciansky, P.C.H. & Vail, P.R., 1998. Mesozoic and Cenozoic sequence chronostratigraphic framework of European Basins. In: Graciansky, P.C.H., Hardenbol, J., Jacquin, Th., Vail, P.R. (ed.): Mesozoic and Cenozoic sequence chronostratigraphic chart 1.Google Scholar
Harsveldt, H.M., 1963. Older conceptions and present view regarding the Mesozoic of the Achterhoek, with special mention of the Triassic limestones. Verhandelingen KNGMG 21(2): 109130.Google Scholar
Head, M.J., Norris, G. & Mudie, P.J., 1989. Palynology and dinocyst stratigraphy of the Upper Miocene and lowermost Pliocene. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Research 105: 423451.Google Scholar
Herngreen, G.F.W. & de Boer, K.F., 1974. Palynology of Rhaetian, Liassic and Dogger strata in the eastern Netherlands. Geologie en Mijnbouw 53(6): 343368.Google Scholar
Herngreen, G.F.W., de Boer, K.F., Romein, B.J., Lissenberg, Th & Wijker, N.C., 1983. Middle Callovian beds in the Achterhoek, Eastern Netherlands. Mededelingen RGD 37(3): 95123.Google Scholar
Herngreen, G.F.W., Hartkopf-Froder, C. & Ruegg, G.H.J., 1994. Age and depositional environment of the Kuhfeld Beds (Lower Cretaceous) in the Alstatte Embayment (W Germany, E Netherlands). Geologie en Mijnbouw 72: 375391.Google Scholar
Herngreen, G.F.W., Van den Bosch, M., & Lissenberg, Th., 2000. Nieuwe inzichten in de stratigrafische ontwikkeling van Jura, Krijt en Onder-Tertiair in de Achterhoek. Grondboor & Hamer 4: 7190.Google Scholar
Houthuys, R., Adriaens, R., Goolaeerts, S., Laga, P., Louwye, S., Matthijs, N., Vandenberghe, N. & Verhaegen, J., 2020. The Diest Formation: a review of insights from the last decades. Geologica Belgica 23(3-4): 199218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, A.W., 1967. Beitrage zur Kenntnis des Miocans von Dingden und seiner Molluskenfauna 1 & 2. Geologica et Palaeontologica 1: 115173.Google Scholar
Janssen, A.W., 1984. Mollusken uit het Mioceen van Winterswijk-Miste. Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging (Hoogwoud): 451 pp.Google Scholar
Janssen, A.W., 2001. The age of the North Sea Basin Hemmoorian (Miocene): holoplanktonic molluscan evidence. Aardkundige Mededelingen 11: 4550.Google Scholar
Köthe, A., 2007. Cenozoic biostratigraphy from the German North Sea sector (G-11-1 borehole, dinoflagellate cysts, calcareous nannoplankton) [Känozoische Biostratigraphie aus dem Deutschen Nordsee-Sektor (Bohrung G-11-1, Dinoflagellatenzysten, Kalknannoplankton)]. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften 158(2): 287327. DOI: 10.1127/1860-1804/2007/0158-0287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köthe, A., Gaedicke, C. & Lutz, R., 2008. Erratum: The age of the Mid-Miocene Unconformity (MMU) in the G-11-1 borehole, German North Sea sector [Berichtigung: Das Alter der Mittelmiozän-Diskordanz in der Bohrung G-11-1, Deutscher Nordsee-Sektor]. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften 159(4): 687689. DOI: 10.1127/1860-1804/2008/0159-0687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, G., Langereis, C., Munsterman, D.K., Van Leeuwen, R.J., Verreussel, R., Meulenkamp, J. & Wong, T.E., 2006. Chronostratigraphy of Late Neogene sediments in the southern North Sea Basin and paleoenvironmental interpretations. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 239(3-4): 426455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.M., Harding, R., Huuse, M., Steward, M. & Brocklehurst, H.L., 2017. The early Quarternary North Sea Basin. Journal of the Geological Society 175(2): 16. DOI: 10.1144/jgs2017-057.Google Scholar
Louwye, S., 2000. Dinoflagellate cysts and acritarchs from the Miocene Zonderschot Sands, northern Belgium: stratigraphy and correlation with contiguous areas. Geologica Belgica 3: 5565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwye, S., 2002. Dinoflagellate cyst biostratigraphy of the Upper Miocene Deurne Sands (Diest Formation) of northern Belgium, southern North Sea Basin. Geological Journal 37(1): 5567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwye, S., Head, M.J. & De Schepper, S., 2004. Dinoflagellate cyst stratigraphy and palaeoecology of the Pliocene in northern Belgium, southern North Sea Basin. Geological Magazine 141(3): 353378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwye, S., 2005. The Early and Middle Miocene transgression at the southern border of the North Sea Basin (northern Belgium). Geological Journal 40: 441456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwye, S., De Schepper, S., Laga, P. & Vandenberghe, N., 2007. The upper Miocene of the southern North Sea Basin (northern Belgium): a palaeoenvironmental and stratigraphical reconstruction using dinoflagellate cysts. Geological Magazine 144(1): 3352. DOI: 10.1017/S0016756806002627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwye, S. & De Schepper, S., 2010. The Miocene-Pliocene hiatus in the southern North Sea Basin (northern Belgium) revealed by dinoflagellate cysts. Geological Magazine 147(5): 760776. DOI: 10.1017/S0016756810000191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwye, S. & Vandenberghe, N., 2020. A reappraisal of the stratigraphy of the upper Miocene unit X in the Maaseik core, eastern Campine area (northern Belgium). Geologica Belgica 23(3-4): 289296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwye, S., Deckers, J., Verhaegen, J., Adriaens, A., & Vandenberghe, N., 2020. A review if the lower and middle Miocene of northern Belgium. Geologica Belgica 23(3-4): 137157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munsterman, D.K. De resultaten van het palynologisch onderzoek naar de ouderdom van boring Gaanderen (B40F1874), interval 21-185 m 2011a. TNO rapport TNO-060-UT-2011-00206/B.Google Scholar
Munsterman, D.K. De resultaten van het palynologische onderzoek naar de ouderdom van de locale members (Aalten, Eibergen) van de Breda Formatie en die van de Rupel Formatie in boring B41G0024 (De Haart, Gelderland) 2011b. TNO rapport TNO-060-UT-2011-02173.Google Scholar
Munsterman, D.K. De resultaten van het palynologische onderzoek naar de ouderdom van boring B58D3261 (Heel), interval 318-429 m 2013. TNO rapport 2013 R11385.Google Scholar
Munsterman, D.K. & Brinkhuis, H., 2004. A southern North Sea Miocene dinoflagellate cyst zonation. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 83(4): 267285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munsterman, D.K. & Deckers, J., 2020. The Oligocene/Miocene boundary in the ON-Mol-1 and Weelde boreholes along the southern margin of the North Sea Basin, Belgium. Geologica Belgica 23(3-4): 127135. DOI: 10.20341/gb.2020.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munsterman, D.K. & Deckers, J., 2022. Biostratigraphic ages and depositional environments of the upper Oligocene to lower Miocene Veldhoven Formation in the central Roer Valley Rift System (SE Netherlands-NE Belgium). Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 101: e6. DOI: 10.1017/njg.2022.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munsterman, D.K., Ten Veen, J.H., Menkovic, A., Deckers, J., Witmans, N., Verhaegen, J., Kerstholt-Boegehold, S.J., Van de Ven, T. & Busschers, F.S., 2019. An updated and revised stratigraphic framework for the Miocene and earliest Pliocene strata of the Roer Valley Graben and adjacent blocks. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 98: e8. DOI: 10.1017/njg.2019.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munsterman, D.K. & Van den Bosch, M. Update en herziening Miocene lithostratigrafie Oost-NL. Voorstel lectostratotype secties m.b.t. de laagpakketten Aalten, Eibergen, Zenderen en Delden in boringen B40F1874 (Gaanderen) en B41G0024 (De Haart) 2021. TNO rapport 2021 R11183.Google Scholar
NAM & RGD, 1980. Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands. Verhandelingen KNGMG 32: 77.Google Scholar
Ogg, J.G., Ogg, G. & Gradstein, F.M., 2016. A Concise Geologic Time Scale. pp. 240.Google Scholar
Pannekoek, A.J., (ed.), 1956. Geologische geschiedenis van Nederland. In: Staatsdrukkerij- en Uitgeversbedrijf, ’s-Gravenhage, 154 pp.Google Scholar
Peletier, W. & Kolstee, H.G., 1986. Winterswijk, Geologie deel I; Inleiding tot de geologie van Winterswijk. Wetenschappelijke Mededelingen KNNV 175: 136.Google Scholar
Powell, A.J., 1986. Latest Palaeogene and earliest Neogene dinoflagellate cysts from the Lemme section, northwest Italy. AASP Contribution Series 17: 83104.Google Scholar
Powell, A.J., 1992. Dinoflagellate cysts of the tertiary system. In: Powell, A.J. (ed): A stratigraphic index of dinoflagellate cysts, 155272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quaijtaal, W., Donders, T.H., Persicoc, D. & Louwye, S., 2014. Characterising the middle Miocene Mi-events in the Eastern North Atlantic realm: A first high-resolution marine palynological record from the Porcupine Basin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 399: 140159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, E.S. & Dybkjær, K., 2014. Patterns of Cenozoic sediment flux from western Scandinavia: discussion. Basin Research 26(2): 338346. DOI: 10.1111/bre.12024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvador, A., 1994. The International Stratigraphic Guide. A guide to stratigraphic classification, terminology, and procedure. In: International subcommission on stratigraphic classification of IUGS. International Commission on Stratigraphy. Geological Society of America: 214.Google Scholar
Schwarzhans, W., 2010. The otoliths from the Miocene of the North Sea Basin. Backhuys Publishers & Margraf Publisher (Leiden/Weikersheim).352 pp.Google Scholar
Stapert, D., 1974. Over het onderkrijt in de omgeving van Winterswijk. Grondboor & Hamer 28(4): 6277.Google Scholar
TNO-GDN, 2023. TNO - Geological Survey of the Netherlands (TNO-GDN). Digital Geological Model of the shallow subsurface of the Netherlands (DGM), version v2.2. https://www.dinoloket.nl/en/subsurface-models/map. Data: Breda Formation. Extraction date 25-01-2023.Google Scholar
Van Adrichem Boogaert, A.H. & Kouwe, W.F.P.(eds) 1993-1997. Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands, revision and update by RGD and NOGEPA. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 50: 39.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, N. & Louwye, S., 2020. An introduction to the Neogene stratigraphy of northern Belgium: present status. Geologica Belgica 23(3–4): 97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Berg, M.W., Van Houten, C.J. & Den Otter, C. Toelichting bij de Geologische Kaart van Nederland 1: 50 000, 34W, 34O/35.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, N., Harris, W.B., Wampler, J.M., Houthuys, R., Louwye, S., Adriaens, R., Vos, K., Lanckackers, T.Matthijs, Deckers, J., Verhaegen, J., Laga, J., Westerhoff, P., W, & Munsterman, D.K., 2014. The implications of K-Ar glauconite dating of the Diest Formation on the paleogeography of the Upper Miocene in Belgium. Geologica Belgica 17/2: 161174.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, N., Wouters, L., Schiltz, M., Beerten, K., Berwouts, I., Vos, K., Houthuys, R., Deckers, J., Louwye, S., Laga, P., Verhaegen, J., Adriaens, R. & Dusar, M., 2020. The Kasterlee Formation and its relation with the Diest and Mol formations in the Belgian Campine. Geologica Belgica 23(3-4): 265288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bosch, M., 1994. Bovenkant Tertiair en Mesozoicum, breukenpatroon, kaartblad 41E, 41F, 41G, 1:25.000. Rapport Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Geologisch Veldlaboratorium Winterswijk.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, M., 1996. Boorlocatiekaarten-Overzichtsprofielen (Achterhoekproject NNM-RGD, kaartblad 41 E, 41 F, 41G). Rapport Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Geologisch Veldlaboratorium Winterswijk, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, M., 1999. Een analyse van bodembewegingen tijdens het Tertiair ten noorden van Winterswijk (provincie Gelderland, Nederland). Contributions to Tertiary and Quaternary Geology 36(1-4): 109132.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, M., 2014. De ontsluitingen in de Laag van Miste te Miste bij Winterswijk. Afzettingen WTKG 35(1): 59.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, M., 2015. Lithostratigrafie van het Oligoceen in de regio Almelo-Winterswijk. Eburon, Delft: 166 pp.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, M., 2022. Geologie en landschap in de gemeente Winterswijk. Verslag van 60 jaar geologisch veldonderzoek.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, M., Cadee, M.C. & Janssen, A.W., 1975. Lithostratigraphical and biostratigraphical subdivision of Tertiary deposits (Oligocene-Pliocene) in Winterswijk-Almelo region (eastern part of the Netherlands). Scripta Geologica 29: 1121.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, M. & Kleijer, H., 2003. De ontwikkeling van het landschap ten oosten van Winterswijk Geologische, bodemkundige en hydrologische impressies, naar aanleiding van het bodem geografisch onderzoek 1995–1997. Cainozoic Research, Special Issue 1: 129.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch en Brouwer, F. Bodemkundig geologische inventarisatie van de gemeente Winterswijk 2009. Altera Wageningen 1797/ Veldlaboratoruium Winterswijk rapport, 37 pp.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, R.J. De stratigrafie van het Oligoceen en Mioceen op het Venlo Blok: kalkige microfossielen, logs en sequenties 2000. TNO internal report 00-16-B.Google Scholar
Van Staalduinen, C.J., et al., 1979. The geology of the Netherlands. Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem).Google Scholar
Verhaegen, J., Frederickz, L. & Schiltz, M., 2020. New insights into the lithostratigraphy and paleogeography of the Messinian Kasterlee Formation form the analysis of a temporary outcrop. Geologica Belgica 23(3-4): 253264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernes, R.W., Deckers, J., Bakker, M.A.J., Bogemans, F., De Ceukelaire, M., Doornenbal, J.C., den Dulk, M., Dusar, M., Van Haren, T.F.M., Heyvaert, V.M.A., Kiden, P., Kruisselbrink, A.F., Lanckacker, T., Menkovic, A., Meyvis, B., Munsterman, D.K., Reindersma, R., ten Veen, J.H., van de Ven, T.J.M., Walstra, J. & Witmans, N. Geologisch en hydrogeologisch 3D model van het Cenozoïcum van de Belgisch-Nederlandse grensstreek van Midden-Brabant / De Kempen (H3O – De Kempen). 2018. Studie uitgevoerd door VITO, TNO-Geologische Dienst Nederland en de Belgische Geologische Dienst in opdracht van Vlaams Planbureau voor Omgeving, Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, TNO, Geologische Dienst Nederland, Nederlandse Provincie Noord-Brabant, Brabant Water, Programmabureau KRW/DHZ Maasregio.Google Scholar
Vernes, R.W., Deckers, J., Walstra, J., Kruisselbrink, A.F., Menkovic, A., Bogemans, F., De Ceukelaire, M., Dirix, K., Dusar, M., Hummelman, H.J., Maes, R., Meyvis, B., Munsterman, D.K., Reindersma, R., Rombaut, B., Van Baelen, K., Van de Ven, T.J.M., Van Haren, T. & Welkenhuysen, K. Geologisch en hydrogeologisch 3D model van het Cenozoïcum van de Belgisch-Nederlandse grensstreek van De Noorderkempen/West-Brabant (H3O-De Voorkempen) 2023. TNO-rapport 2023 R10347, VITO-rapport 2023/RMA/R/2906, BGD-rapport 2023/02, 156 pp.Google Scholar
Von Koenen, A., 1882. Die Gastropoda holostomata und tectibranchiata, Cephalopoda und Pteropoda des Norddeutschen Miocäns. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Beilage II: 223363.Google Scholar
Waterschoot van der Gracht, W.A.J.M. van, 1918. Eindverslag over de onderzoekingen en uitkomsten van den Dienst der Rijksopsporing van Delfstoffen in Nederland 1903-1916. ’t Kasteel van Aemstel (Amsterdam): 664 pp.Google Scholar
Zevenboom, D., 1995, Dinoflagellate cysts from the Mediterranean Late Oligocene and Miocene. Ph.D. Dissertatie Universiteit Utrecht: 221 pp.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Holostratotype sections of Miocene members in the Achterhoek (Van den Bosch et al., 1975).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Location map of the eastern part of the Netherlands showing the E-W transect from Winterswijk to Didam including all boreholes and logs (www.dinoloket.nl). The transect is plotted on the Miocene base (DGM v2.2; TNO-GDN, 2023) with the transition from red to blue colors representing increase in depth. Fault lines are indicated in grey (DGM v2.2; TNO-GDN, 2023; supplemented with one fault line of Van den Bos & Brouwer, 2009 south of borehole B41E0258).

Figure 2

Figure 2. The main structural elements in the eastern part of the Netherlands (after Geluk, 1998).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Palaeogeographic map of the mid-Miocene (after Gibbard & Lewin, 2016).

Figure 4

Table 2. Borehole meta-data information.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Dinoflagellate cyst zonation sensu Munsterman and Deckers (2020).

Figure 6

Figure 5. E-W orientated lithostratigraphic cross-section using 21 boreholes (see Figure 1 for position of the boreholes), including gamma-ray logs and molluscan zones, if available (see Table 3 for lithostratigraphic unit codes). Correlation lines follow the litho-logs (correlatable horizons with the gamma-ray log are linked by dotted lines to the right). For explanation of the colours of the columns showing the mollusc zones, located left of selected litho-logs (Aalten Member and base Stemerdink member), see legend in Figure 13.

Figure 7

Table 3. New (this study) and old (Van den Bosch et al., 1975) lithostratigraphic synthesis of the Miocene Achterhoek (*proposed).

Figure 8

Figure 6. Lithological and lithostratigraphical overview of the temporary Miste-03 outcrop.

Figure 9

Table 4. Overview palynological results including age assessment of the outcrop Miste-03.

Figure 10

Figure 7. Palynological interpretation and distribution chart of the Miste-03 outcrop.

Figure 11

Figure 8. Palynological interpretation and distribution chart of the Barlo borehole (B41B0135).

Figure 12

Table 5. Summary of the palynological results regarding age assessment of the Barlo borehole (B41B0135).

Figure 13

Figure 9. Lithological section of the De Haart borehole (B41G0024).

Figure 14

Figure 10. Lithological section of the Gaanderen borehole (B40F1874).

Figure 15

Table 6. Overview palynological results regarding age assessment borehole De Haart (B41G0024).

Figure 16

Figure 11. Palynological interpretation of the De Haart borehole. The high peak values in the gamma-ray log at 37.7 m depth are associated with phosphorites.

Figure 17

Figure 12. Palynological distribution chart of the De Haart borehole.

Figure 18

Table 7. Molluscan abundances provided for the De Haart/Langeler borehole (this work) and boreholes Miste, De Vlijt and Stemerdink. L = borehole De Haart/Langeler 41G.1-94, S = Stemerdink borehole 41E.4-387 (De Vogel, 1971), M = Miste borehole 41E.3-75 (De Vogel, 1971), DV = De Vlijt borehole 41D.2-7 (De Vogel, 1971). *This taxon contains likely additional taxa of ribbed Dentalium species (J. van der Voort, personal communication).

Figure 19

Figure 13. Correlation of molluscan zones from 4 successions in the Groote Heide Formation, Aalten and Stemerdink members. De Vlijt: the farm “De Vlijt”, De Haart, Aalten. Note the “De Vlijt”quarry. Stemerdink is located in Brinkheurne, Winterswijk.

Figure 20

Table 8. New holo- and lectostratotype sections for the members of the Diessen Formation.

Figure 21

Table 9. Overview age assessment of the Gaanderen borehole (B40F1874), based on palynology.

Figure 22

Figure 14. Palynological interpretation of the Gaanderen borehole.

Figure 23

Figure 15. Palynological distribution chart of the Gaanderen borehole.

Figure 24

Figure 16. Panel showing the correlation of the Groote Heide Formation in the De Haart borehole and the Groote Heide type section borehole.

Figure 25

Figure 17. Panel showing the correlation of the Diessen Formation in the Gaanderen borehole and the Goirle type section borehole.

Figure 26

Figure 18. Schematic cross-section of the Oligocene-Pliocene lithostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy from the south-eastern part (Germany; basin margin) to the northern part (the Netherlands; basin centre) of the RVG, and the Achterhoek and Antwerp area (s.l. Campine & City; basin margin). The lithostratigraphy is modified after Deckers & Louwye (2019), Van Adrichem Boogaert and Kouwe (1993–1997) and Munsterman et al. (2019). The Antwerp (City and Campine) area is adjusted after Vandenberghe & Louwye (2020) and Everaert et al. (2020).