Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:59:41.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on selected Cretaceous echinoids from south-central Sakhalin, Far East Russia∙

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2014

J.W.M. Jagt ,
E.A. Jagt-Yazykova  and
T.D. Zonova
J.W.M. Jagt*
Affiliation:
Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, De Bosquetplein 6-7, 6211 KJ Maastricht, the Netherlands
E.A. Jagt-Yazykova
Affiliation:
Uniwersytet Opolski, Zakład Paleobiologii, Katedra Biosystematyki, ul Oleska 22, 45-052 Opole, Poland
T.D. Zonova
Affiliation:
VNIGRI, Liteyny 39, 191014 Sankt-Peterburg, Russia
*
Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From Albian, Santonian and Campanian strata in south-central Sakhalin, four echinoid taxa are described, illustrated and discussed. In Far East Russia, echinoids are rare constituents amongst mid- and Late Cretaceous macrofaunal assemblages in which inoceramid and non-inoceramid bivalves, plus heteromorph and non-heteromorph ammonites predominate. The sole regular species in the present lot is represented by an incomplete external mould of a primary spine of a rhabdocidarid, Polycidaris(?) sp., from the lower Campanian. Irregular taxa include a fragmentary, specifically indeterminate ‘pygurid’, Echinopygus(?) sp., of late Albian age, as well as two spatangoids. One of these, a toxasterid of late Campanian age, is assigned to Niponaster cf. hokkaidensis (Lambert in Lambert & Thiéry, 1924). The other is a new hemiasterid with a semi-ethmophract apical disc, a peripetalous fasciole with diffuse boundaries (parafasciole) and posterior petals that are near-equal in length to anterior ones, from lowermost Campanian strata. For this, the name Palhemiaster natalyae n. sp. is introduced. Comparisons with coeval echinoid faunas from nearby Hokkaido (northern Japan) are hampered by the generally poor preservation of the latter. However, with the exception of Niponaster cf. hokkaidensis, none of the forms recorded in the present paper appears to be represented in those Japanese assemblages.

Keywords

CidaroidaNeognathostomataSpatangoidanew taxon
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 92 , Issue 2-3 , September 2013 , pp. 123 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2013

Footnotes

∙

In: Mulder, E.W.A., Jagt, J.W.M. & Schulp, A.S. (eds): The Sunday's child of Dutch earth sciences - a tribute to Bert Boekschoten on the occasion of his 80th birthday.

References

Agassiz, L., 1840. Description des Échinodermes fossiles de la Suisse, II. Mémoires de la Société helvétique des Sciences naturelles 4: 1–107.Google Scholar
Agassiz, L. & Desor, E., 1846–1847. Catalogue raisonné des familles, des genres et des espèces de la classe des echinoderms. Annales de Sciences naturelles 6: 305–347; 7: 129-168; 8: 5-35, 355-380.Google Scholar
Clark, W.B., 1915. Part I – The Mesozoic Echinodermata. In: Clark, W.B. & Twitchell, M.W. The Mesozoic and Cenozoic Echinodermata of the United States. Monograph of the United States Geological Survey 54: 9–100.Google Scholar
Clark, H.L., 1917. Hawaiian and other Pacific Echini. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 46: 81–284.Google Scholar
Claus, C.F.W., 1876. Grundzüge der Zoologie (3rd edition). N.G. Elwert'sche Universitätsbuchhandlung (Marburg/Leipzig), xii + 1254 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, C.F.W., 1880. Grundzüge der Zoologie (4th edition), volumes 1-2. N.G. Elwert'sche Universitätsbuchhandlung (Marburg/Leipzig), vii + 821 pp.; iv + 522 pp.Google Scholar
De la Beche, H.L., 1824. Remarks on the geology of the south coast of England, from Bridport harbour to Babbacombe Bay, Devon. Transactions of the Geological Society of London (2)1: 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lamarck, J.B.A.P.M., 1816. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres, 2. Verdière (Paris), 568 pp.Google Scholar
D'Orbigny, A.D., 1853–1860. Paléontologie Fran¸aise. Description des animaux invertébrés. Terrain crétacée 6. Échinoïdes irréguliers. Masson (Paris), 596 pp.Google Scholar
Fischer, A.G., 1966. Order Spatangoida. In: Moore, R.C. (ed.). Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part U, Echinodermata 3. The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas Press (Boulder/Lawrence): U367–U695.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., 1999. Late Campanian echinoids and crinoids from the Gschliefgraben (Ultrahelvetic, Austria). Beiträge zur Paläontologie 24: 7–22.Google Scholar
Jagt-Yazykova, E.A., 2011. Palaeobiogeographical and palaeobiological aspects of mid- and Late Cretaceous ammonite evolution and bio-events in the Russian Pacific. Scripta Geologica 143: 15–121.Google Scholar
Jeannet, A., 1936. Sur deux échinides irreguliers du Crétacé inférieur d'Ibeza (Baleares). Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Amsterdam 38: 181–185.Google Scholar
Jimbõ, K., 1894. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Fauna der Kreideformation von Hokkaidō. Palaeontologische Abhandlungen, neue Folge 6: 147–194.Google Scholar
Lambert, J., 1900. Étude sur quelques échinides de l'Infra-Lias et du Lias. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences naturelles et historiques de l'Yonne 52 (1899): 3–57.Google Scholar
Lambert, J., 1916. Sur l'existence de l'étage Valangien et sur l'oscillation barrémienne dans l'Aube et dans l'Yonne avec observations sur les échinides de ces étages. Mémoires de la Société Académique de l'Aube 80: 19–94.Google Scholar
Lambert, J., 1920a. Sur quelques genres nouveaux d'Échinides. Mémoires de la Société Académique de l'Aube 84: 1–30.Google Scholar
Lambert, J., 1920b. Étude sur quelques formes primitives des spatangidés. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences historiques et naturelles de l'Yonne 73: 107–147.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. & Thiéry, P., 1909–1925. Essai de nomenclature raisonnée des échinides. Librairie Septime Ferrière (Chaumont), 607 pp.Google Scholar
Leske, N.G., 1778. Iacobi Theodori Klein naturalis disposition Echinodermatum, edita et descriptionibus novisque inventis et synonymis auctorum aucta. G.E. Beer (Lipsiae), xxii + 278 pp.Google Scholar
McNamara, K.J., 1987. The holasteroid echinoid Echinocorys from the Maastrichtian of Western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum 13: 419–426.Google Scholar
Morishita, A., 1955. Cretaceous echinoid, Niponaster from the island of Awazi, Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan 20: 99–100.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T., 1903. The Danish Ingolf Expedition, IV(1). Echinoidea (part 1). Bianco Luno (København), 198 pp.Google Scholar
Néraudeau, D., 1993. Sexual dimorphism in mid-Cretaceous hemiasterid echinoids. Palaeontology 36: 311–317.Google Scholar
Néraudeau, D., David, B. & Madon, C., 1998. Tuberculation in spatangoid fascioles: delineating plausible homologies. Lethaia 31: 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, C., 1999. New spatangoid echinoids (Echinodermata) from the Upper Cretaceous of Jordan: their taxonomy and phylogenetic importance. Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen E30: 175–189.Google Scholar
Nisiyama, S., 1966. The echinoid fauna from Japan and adjacent regions. Part I. Palaeontological Society of Japan, Special Papers 11: i-iv + 1–277.Google Scholar
Nisiyama, S., 1968. The echinoid fauna from Japan and adjacent regions. Part II. Palaeontological Society of Japan, Special Papers 13: i-iv + 1–491.Google Scholar
Pomel, A., 1883. Classification méthodique et genera des échinides vivants et fossiles. Aldophe Jourdan (Alger), 131 pp.Google Scholar
Quenstedt, F.A., 1856–1858. Der Jura. Laupp (Tübingen), 842 pp.Google Scholar
Roemer, F.A., 1835–1836. Die Versteinerungen des norddeutschen Oolithen-Gebirges. Hahn'sche Hofbuchhandlung (Hannover), 218 pp.Google Scholar
Saito, T., 1959. Notes on some Cretaceous fossils from the Nakaminato Formation, Nakaminato City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan; Part II. Bulletin of the Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ibaraki University, Natural Sciences 9: 79–85.Google Scholar
Sey, I.I., Okuneva, T.M., Zonova, T.D., Kalacheva, E.D. & Yazykova, E.A., 2004. Atlas mezozoiskoi morskoi fauny dal'nego vostoka Rossii. Izdatel'stvo VSEGEI (Sankt-Peterburg), 234 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, A.B., 1981. Implications of lantern morphology for the phylogeny of post-Palaeozoic echinoids. Palaeontology 24: 779–801.Google Scholar
Smith, A.B., 1988. Echinoids. In: Smith, A.B., Paul, C.R.C., Gale, A.S. & Donovan, S.K. Cenomanian and Lower Turonian echinoderms from Wilmington, SE Devon. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Geology) 42: 16–189.Google Scholar
Smith, A.B., 1995. Late Campanian-Maastrichtian echinoids from the United Arab Emirates-Oman border region. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum London (Geology) 51: 121–240.Google Scholar
Smith, A.B. & Bengtson, P., 1991. Cretaceous echinoids from north-eastern Brazil. Fossils and Strata 31: 1–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.B. & Jeffery, C.H., 2000. Maastrichtian and Palaeocene echinoids: a key to world faunas. Special Papers in Palaeontology 63: 1–406.Google Scholar
Smith, A.B. & Kroh, A. (eds), 2013. The Echinoid Directory. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/projects/echinoid-directory (accessed 17 March 2013).Google Scholar
Smith, A.B. & Wright, C.W., 1989. British Cretaceous echinoids. Part 1, General introduction and Cidaroida. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society London 141(578): 1–101.Google Scholar
Smith, A.B. & Wright, C.W., 2000. British Cretaceous echinoids. Part 6, Neognathostomata (Cassiduloids). Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society London 154(615): 391–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.B. & Wright, C.W., 2008. British Cretaceous echinoids. Part 8, Atelostomata, 2. Spatangoida (1). Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society London 162(630): 569–635.Google Scholar
Tanaka, K., 1965. Cretaceous echinoids from the Sanchu Graben, central Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, new series 59: 126–142.Google Scholar
Tanaka, K., 1984. Hemiasterid echinoids from the Upper Cretaceous of Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, new series 135: 427–444.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, S., 1903. On the fossil echinoids of Japan. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo 17: 1–27.Google Scholar
Vadet, A., 1988. Révision des ‘Cidaris’ d'Oxfordien et du Kimmeridgien européens. Mémoires de la Société académique du Boulonnais 4: 1–148.Google Scholar
Yazykova, E.A., 2002. Ammonite and inoceramid radiations after the Santonian-Campanian bioevent in Sakhalin, Far East Russia. Lethaia 35: 51–60.Google Scholar
Yazykova, E.A., 2004. Ammonite biozonation and litho-/biostratigraphy of the Cretaceous in Sakhalin and adjacent territories of Far East Russia. Acta Geologica Polonica 54: 273–312.Google Scholar
Yazykova, E.A., Peryt, D., Zonova, T.D. & Kazintsova, L.I., 2004. The Cenomanian/Turonian boundary in Sakhalin, Far East Russia: ammonites, inoceramids, foraminifera, and radiolarians. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 47: 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yehara, S., 1915. The Cretaceous Trigoniae (sic) from Miyako and Hokkaido. Scientific Reports of Tohoku Imperial University (2)2: 35–44.Google Scholar
Zonova, T.D., Kazintsova, L.I. & Yazykova, E.A., 1993. Atlas rukovodiashchikh grupp melovoi fauny Sakhalina. Nedra (Sankt-Peterburg), 326 + ii pp.Google Scholar