Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:22:07.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new record of Clidastes (Squamata, Mosasauridae) from the Upper Campanian of the Münster Basin (NW Germany)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

C. Diedrich  and
E.W.A. Mulder
C. Diedrich
Affiliation:
Nansenstraße 8, D-33790 Halle/Westfalen, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]
E.W.A. Mulder
Affiliation:
Museum Natura Docet, Oldenzaalsestraat 39, NL-7591 GL Denekamp, the Netherlands, e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From Upper Campanian turbiditic marls at Beckum in the Münster Basin (NW Germany) the anterior portion of a mosasaurid premaxilla with abutting fragments of the left and right maxilla is described and referred to the genus Clidastes. It shows the process of tooth replacement very well. This taxon is recorded for the first time from Germany. Clidastes co-existed in central Europe with other mosasaurids such as representatives of the genus Leiodon and Mosasauridae indet.

Keywords

ClidastesmosasaursmaxillapremaxillaGermanyCampanian
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 67 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2004

References

Arnold, H., 1964. Zur Lithologie und Zyklik des Beckumer Campans. Fortschritte der Geologie in Rheinland und Westfalen 7: 679–690.Google Scholar
Bardet, N., 1990. Premiere mention du genre Hainosaurus (Squamata, Mosasauridae) en France. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris (2) 311: 751–756.Google Scholar
Bardet, N., Barbin, V., Laurin, M. & Janin, M.-C, 1997. Première découverte du mosasaure Prognathodon giganteus (Squamata) dans le Campanien (Crétacé supérieur) de Champagne, France. Revue de Paléobiologie 16: 225–230.Google Scholar
Bardet, N., Wellnhofer, P. & Herm, D., 1994. Discovery of ichthyosaur remains (Reptilia) in the Upper Cenomanian of Bavaria. Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und historische Geologie 34: 213–220.Google Scholar
Bell, G.L. Jr, 1997. A phylogenetic revision of North American and Adriatic Mosasauroidea. In: Callaway, J.M. & Nicholls, E.L. (Eds): Ancient Marine Reptiles. Academic Press (New York / London): 293–332.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1868. (Remarks on Clidastes iguanavus, Nectoportheus validus and Elasmosaurus). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 20:181.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1869. On the reptilian orders Pythonomorpha and Streptosauria. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History 12: 250–266.Google Scholar
Diedrich, C., 1997. Ein Dentale von Coniosaurus crassidens OWEN (Varanoidea) aus dem Ober-Cenoman von Halle/Westf. (NW-Deutschland). Geologie und Paläontologie Westfalens 47: 43–51.Google Scholar
Diedrich, C., 1999a. Erster Nachweis von Dolichosaurus longicollis Owen (Varanoidea) aus dem Ober-Cenoman von Halle/Westf. (NW-Deutschland). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1999 (6): 372–384.Google Scholar
Diedrich, C., 1999b. Ein Humerus der Chelonide Rhinochelis (?) cf. carusiana (Geinitz 1872–75) aus dem Mittel-Cenoman von Halle/Westf. (NW-Deutschland). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1999 (9): 541–550.Google Scholar
Dollo, L., 1882. Note sur l’ostéologie des Mosasauridae. Bulletin du Musée royale d’Histoire naturelle de Belgique 1: 55–74, 3 pis.Google Scholar
Dollo, L., 1885. Première note sur le Hainosaure, Mosasaurien nouveau de la craie brune phosphatée de Mesvin-Ciply, près Mons. Bulletin du Musée royale d’Histoire naturelle de Belgique 4: 25–35 Google Scholar
Dollo, L., 1890. Première note sur les mosasauriens de Maestricht. Bulletin de la Société belge de Géologie, de Paléontologie et d’Hydrologie 4: 151–169, pi. 8.Google Scholar
Dortangs, R.W., Schulp, A.S., Mulder, E.W.A., Jagt, J.W.M., Peeters, H.H.G. & De Graaf, D.T., 2002. A large new mosasaur from the Upper Cretaceous of the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 81: 1–8.Google Scholar
Everhart, M., 2003. www.oceansofkansas.com.Google Scholar
Geinitz, H. B., 1849. Das Quader-sandsteingebirge oder Kreidegebirge in Deutschland. Craz und Gerlach Verlag (Freiberg): 290 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geinitz, H. B., 1872-75. Das Elbthalgebirge in Sachsen. Zweiter Theil. Der mittlere und obere Quader. Palaeontographica 20: vii + 245 pp.Google Scholar
Giers, R., 1958. Die Mukronatenkreide im östlichen Münsterland. Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch 34: 1–148.Google Scholar
Hiß, M., 1995. Kreide. In: Hilden, H.D. (Ed.): Geologie im Münsterland. Geologisches Landesamt Nordrhein-Westfalen (Krefeld): 41–66.Google Scholar
Kuypers, M.M.M., Jagt, J.W.M., Peeters, H.H.G., De Graaf, D.Th., Dortangs, R.W., Deckers, M.J.M., Eysermans, D., Janssen, M.J. & Arpot, L., 1998. Laat-kretaceische mosasauriers uit Luik-Limburg: nieuwe vondsten leiden tot nieuwe inzichten. Publicaties van het Natuurhistorisch Genootschap in Limburg 41:5–47.Google Scholar
Lee, M.S.Y., 1997. On snake-like dentition in mosasaurian lizards. Journal of Natural History 31: 303–314.Google Scholar
Lindgren, J., 1998. Early Campanian mosasaurs (Reptilia; Mosasauridae) from the Kristianstad Basin, southern Sweden. Examensarbete i geologi vid Lunds Universitet 20 (95): 1–25.Google Scholar
Lindgren, J. & Siverson, M., in press. The first record of the mosasaur Clidastes from Europe and its palaeogeographic implications. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica.Google Scholar
Lingham-Soliar, T., 1992. The Tylosaurine Mosasaurs (Reptilia, Mosasauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Europe and Africa. Bulletin de l’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 62: 171–194.Google Scholar
Lingham-Soliar, T., 1994. The Mosasaur Plioplatecarpus (Reptilia, Mosasauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Europe. Bulletin de l’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 64: 177–211.Google Scholar
Lingham-Soliar, T., 1995. Anatomy and functional morphology of the largest marine reptile known, Mosasaurus hoffmanni (Mosasauridae, Reptilia) from the Upper Cretaceous, Upper Maastrichtian of the Netherlands. Philosophical Transactions of the royal Society of London B347: 155–180.Google Scholar
Lingham-Soliar, T. & Nolf, D., 1989. The mosasaur Prognathodon (Reptilia, Mosasauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Belgium. Bulletin de l’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 59: 137–190.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R., 1888. Catalogue of the fossil reptilia and amphibia in the British Museum (Natural History). I Ornithosauria, Crocodilia, Dinosauria, Squamata, Rhynchocephalia and Proterosauria. British Museum (Natural History) (London) 309 pp.Google Scholar
Machalski, M., Jagt, J.W.M., Dortangs, R.W., Mulder, E.W.A. & Radwanski, A., 2003. Campanian and Maastrichtian mosasaurid reptiles from central Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 48 (3): 397–408.Google Scholar
Merriam, J.C., 1894. Über die Pythonomorphen der Kansas Kreide. Palaeontographica 41: 1–39.Google Scholar
Milner, A.C., 2002. Reptiles. In: Smith, A.B. & Batten, D.J. (Eds): Fossils of the Chalk. Palaeontological Association Field Guides to Fossils 2: 325–343. Second edition, revised and enlarged.Google Scholar
Mulder, E.W.A., 1999. Transatlantic latest Cretaceous mosasaurs (Reptilia, Lacertilia) from the Maastrichtian type area and New Jersey. In: Jagt, J.W.M., Lambers, PH., Mulder, E.W.A. & Schulp, A.S. (Eds): Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Vertebrate Palaeontology, Maastricht, May 6–9, 1998. Geologie en Mijnbouw 78: 281–300.Google Scholar
Mulder, E.W.A., Jagt, J.W.M., Kuypers, M.M.M., Peeters, H.H.G. & Rompen, P., 1998. Preliminary observations on the stratigraphic distribution of Late Cretaceous marine and terrestrial reptiles from the Maastrichtian type area (SE Netherlands, NE Belgium). Oryctos 1: 55–64.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1850. Description of the fossil reptiles of the Chalk formations In: Dixon, F. (Ed.): The geology and fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous formations of Sussex. Longman, Brown, Green and Longman (London): 378–405.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1851. A monograph of the fossil Reptilia of the Cretaceous formations. Part I. Chelonia (Lacertilia & C.). Monographs of the Palaeontological Society1851-64: 1–118.Google Scholar
Pompeckj, J.F., 1910. Über einen Fund von Mosasaurier-Resten im Ober-Senon von Haldem. Jahresberichte des niedersächsischen geologischen Vereins 3: 122–140.Google Scholar
Riegraf, W. 1995. Radiolarien, Diatomeen, Cephalopoden und Stratigraphic im pelagischen Campanium Westfalens (Ober-kreide, NW-Deutschland). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 197: 129–200.Google Scholar
Russell, D.A., 1967. Systematics and morphology of American Mosasaurs (Reptilia, Sauria). Peabody Museum of Natural History, Bulletin 23: viii +240 pp.Google Scholar
Sachs, S., 2000. Mosasaurier-Reste aus der Ober-Kreide von Nordrhein-Westfalen. Geologie und Paläontologie Westfalens 56: 35–44.Google Scholar
Von der Marck, W., 1858. Über einige Wirbeltiere, Cruster und Cephalopoden der Westfälischen Kreide. Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft 10: 231–271.Google Scholar
Von der Marck, W., 1892. Die vorzeitlichen Reptilien und Fische Westfalens. In: Landois, H. (Ed.): Westfalens Tierleben in Wort und Bild. Band 3. Die Reptilien, Amphibien und Fische. 1. Buch. Schöningh (Paderborn): 440 p.Google Scholar
Von Meyer, H., 1856. Helochelis Danubia, aus dem Grünsande von Kehlheim in Bayern. Palaeontographica 4: 96–105.Google Scholar
Zäher, H. & Rieppel, O., 1999. Tooth implantation and replacement in squamates, with special reference to mosasaur lizards and snakes. American Museum Novitates 3271: 1–19.Google Scholar