Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:40:58.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The geometry and stratigraphic position of the Maassluis Formation (western Netherlands and southeastern North Sea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

H.S.M. Jansen ,
J. Huizer ,
J.W.A. Dijkmans ,
C. Mesdag  and
J.E. van Hinte
H.S.M. Jansen*
Affiliation:
J&G Consultants J. Rosenkrantzlaan 35, 2104 CC Heemstede, The Netherlands; e-mail:[email protected]
J. Huizer
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO - National Geological Survey, P.O. Box 80015, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands; e-mail:[email protected]
J.W.A. Dijkmans
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO - National Geological Survey, P.O. Box 80015, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands; e-mail:[email protected]
C. Mesdag
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO - National Geological Survey, P.O. Box 80015, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands; e-mail:[email protected]
J.E. van Hinte
Affiliation:
de Lairessestraat 78 lh, 1071 PH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
1(corresponding author)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The geometry and depositional history of the Maassluis Formation is described from an East-West oriented transect located in the west-central Netherlands and P- and Q-blocks in the Dutch offshore area. The Late Pliocene to Early Pleistocene Maassluis Formation was deposited under near coastal marine conditions. Two distinct facies are distinguished: (1) medium grained sands with a blocky GR/SP-log pattern that were deposited under intertidal and aeolian conditions and (2) medium to coarse grained sands deposited in a subtidal environment showing a clear coarsening upward trend. The lower part of the Maassluis Formation is laterally equivalent to the shallow marine Oosterhout Formation and gets progressively younger towards the West. The upper part is lateral equivalent to estuarine and mudflat deposits (Balk Member, c.q. Peize Formation) in the central part of The Netherlands and to river deposits (Peize Formation) further to the East.

Keywords

Maassluis FormationmarineLate PlioceneEarly Pleistocenedepositional model
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 93 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2004

References

Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Aubry, M.-P. & Hardenbol, J. (Eds), 1995. Geochronology, time scales and global stratigraphic correlation. SEPM (Tulsa): 386 pp.Google Scholar
Bijlsma, S., 1981. Fluvial sedimentation from the Fenno-scandian area into the north-west European basin during the late Cenozoic. Geologie en Mijnbouw 60: 337–345.Google Scholar
De Graciansky, P.C., Hardenbol, J., Jaquin, T. & Vail, P.R. (Eds), 1998. Mesozoic and Cenozoic sequence stratigraphy of European basins. SEPM (Tulsa): 786 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doppert, J.W. Chr., Ruegg, G.H.J., Van Staalduinen, C. J., Zagwijn, W.H. & Zandstra, J.G., 1975. Formaties van het Kwartair en Boven-Tertiair in Nederland. In: Zagwijn, W.H. & Van Staalduinen, C.J. (Eds):Toelichting bij geologische overzichtskaarten van Nederland. Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem): 114–118.Google Scholar
Doppert, J.W.C., 1980. Lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of marine neogene deposits in The Netherlands. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 32: 255–311.Google Scholar
Haq, B.U., Hardenbol, J. & Vail, P.R., 1987. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science 235: 1156–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansen, H.S.M., Huizer, J., Dijkmans, J.W.A. & Van Hinte, J.E., 2004. Strontium (87Sr/86Sr) dating of marine shells from Pliocene and Pleistocene shallow marine deposits in The Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 83/1, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munsterman, D.K., 1999. De resultaten van het dinoflagellatenonderzoek aan boring 30F470 (Noordwijk), traject: 131.25 -454.10m.TNO rapport NITG-99-108-B: 1–8.Google Scholar
Oele, E., Apon, W., Fischer, M.M., Hoogendoorn, R., Mesdag, C.S., De Mulder, E.F.J., Overzee, B., Sesören, A. & Westerhoff, W.E., 1983. Surveying the Netherlands, Sampling Techniques, Maps and their application. Geologie en Mijnbouw 62: 355–372.Google Scholar
Overeem, I., Weltje, G.J., Bishop-Kay, C. & Kroonenberg, S.B., 2001. The Late Cenozoic Eridanos delta system in the Southern North Sea basin: a climate signal in the sediment supply? Basin Research 13: 293–312.Google Scholar
Spaink, G., 1975. Zonering van het mariene Onder-Pleistoceen en Plioceen op grond van molluskenfauna’s. In: Zagwijn, W.H. & Van Staalduinen, C.J. (Eds): Toelichting bij geologische overzichtskaarten van Nederland. Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem): 118–122.Google Scholar
Vail, P.R., Mitchum, R.M. & Thompson, S. III, 1977. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level, part 11 : Glossary of terms used in seismic stratigraphy. In: Payton, C.E. (Ed.). Seismic stratigraphy applications to hydrocarbon exploration. American Association of petroleum geologists Memoir 26: 205–212.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, R.J.W., 1999. Foraminiferenonderzoek aan de boring Noordwijk 30F470.TNO rapport NITG-99-145-B: 1–8.Google Scholar
Weerts, H.J.T., Cleveringa, P., Ebbink, J.H.J. & Westerhoff, W.E., 2000. De liťhostratigrafische indeling van Nederland - Formaties uit het Tertiair en Kwartair. Rapport TNO-NITG 00–95-A.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1998. Borders and boundaries: a century of stratigraphical research in the Tegelen-Reuver area of Limburg (The Netherlands). Mededelingen Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste GeowetenschappenTNO 60: 19–34.Google Scholar
Ziegler, P.A., 1990. Geological Atlas of Western and Central Europe (2nd edition). Shell Internationale Petroleum Maatschappij: 239 pp.Google Scholar