Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:40:34.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can Recent traces help in recognising probable jellyfish remains from the Muschelkalk of Winterswijk? A comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2014

G.C. Cadée*
Affiliation:
NIOZ Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek der Zee, Postbus 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, the Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A possible other explanation is given for one of the probably jellyfish remains published by Oosterink & Winkelhorst in this Journal. Comparison with Recent traces suggests one (fig. 12) might be a ‘scribe mark’.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2013

References

Hertweck, G., 1966. Möglichkeiten des Fossilwerdens von Quallen – im Experiment. Natur und Museum 96: 456462.Google Scholar
Oosterink, H.W. & Winkelhorst, H., 2013. Probable remains of jellyfish (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) from the Lower Middel Triassic (Anisian) of Winterswijk, eastern Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 92(1): 6167.Google Scholar
Pilkey, O.H., Neal, W.J., Kedlley, J.T. & Cooper, J.A.G., 2011. The World's Beaches. A global guide to the science of the shoreline. University of California Press (Berkeley), 283 pp.Google Scholar
Schäfer, W., 1941. Fossilisations-Bedingungen von Quallen und Laichen. Senckenbergiana 23: 189216.Google Scholar
Schäfer, W., 1962. Aktuo-Paläontologie nach Studien in der Nordsee. W. Kramer (Frankfurt am Main), 666 pp.Google Scholar
Walcott, C.D., 1898. Fossil Medusae. Monographs of the United States Geological Survey 30: 1201.Google Scholar