Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:31:03.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bone damage in Allopleuron hofmanni (Cheloniidae, Late Cretaceous)∙

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2014

R. Janssen ,
R.R. van Baal  and
A.S. Schulp
R. Janssen*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
R.R. van Baal
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
A.S. Schulp
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, De Bosquetplein 6-7, 6211 KJ Maastricht, the Netherlands Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands
*
Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We describe pathologies and post-mortem damage observed in specimens of the late Maastrichtian marine cheloniid turtle Allopleuron hofmanni. Shallow circular lesions on carapace bones are common and possibly illustrate barnacle attachment/embedment. Deep, pit-like marks are confined to the neural rim and the inner surface of peripheral elements; these may have been caused either by barnacle attachment or disease. A number of linear marks found on outer carapace surfaces are identified as tooth marks of scavengers, others as possible domichnia of boring bivalves. A fragmentary scapula and prescapular process displays radular traces of molluscs (gastropods and/or polyplacophorans; ichnogenus Radulichnus). These diverse types of bone damage suggest both live and dead marine turtles to have been commonly utilised by predators, scavengers and encrusters in the type Maastrichtian marine ecosystem.

Keywords

TestudinesMaastrichtianpathologyscavengingmolluscsbarnacles
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 92 , Issue 2-3 , September 2013 , pp. 153 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2013

Footnotes

∙

In: Mulder, E.W.A., Jagt, J.W.M. & Schulp, A.S. (eds): The Sunday's child of Dutch earth sciences – a tribute to Bert Boekschoten on the occasion of his 80th birthday.

References

Cooper, J.E. & Jackson, O.F., 1981. Diseases of the Reptilia. Academic Press Inc. (London), 415 pp.Google Scholar
Dortangs, R.W., Schulp, A.S., Mulder, E.W.A., Jagt, J.W.M., Peeters, H.H.G. & De Graaf, D.T., 2002. A large new mosasaur from the Upper Cretaceous of The Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 81: 1–8.Google Scholar
Felder, P.J., 1994. Late Cretaceous (Santonian-Maastrichtian) sedimentation rates in the Maastricht (NL), Liège/Campine (B) and Aachen (D) area. Annales de la Société géologique de Belgique 117: 311–319.Google Scholar
Frick, M.G., Williams, K.L. & Robinson, M., 1998. Epibionts associated with nesting loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in Georgia, USA. Herpetological Review 29: 211–214.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E., 1831. Synopsis Reptilium; or short descriptions of the species of reptiles. Synopsis Reptilium, Part 1: Tortoises, Crocodiles and Enaliosaurians. Treuttel, Würtz & Co. (London), viii + 86 pp.Google Scholar
Hayashi, R., 2013. A checklist of turtle and whale barnacles (Cirripedia: Thoracica: Coronuloidea). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 93: 143–182.Google Scholar
Hayashi, R., Chan, B.K.K., Simon-Belcher, N., Watanabe, H., Guy-Haim, T., Yonezawa, T., Levy, Y., Shuto, T. & Achituv, Y., 2013. Phylogenetic position and evolutionary history of the turtle and whale barnacles (Cirripedia: Balanomorpha: Coronuloidea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 67: 9–14.Google Scholar
Herngreen, G.F.W. & Wong, T.E., 2007. Cretaceous. In: Wong, T.E., Batjes, D.A.J. & De Jager, J. (eds): Geology of the Netherlands. Edita-KNAW (Amsterdam): 127–150.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, A.R. & Bromley, R.G., 2009. New ichnotaxa based on tooth impressions on dinosaur and whale bones. Geological Quarterly 53: 373–382.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., 1999. Late Cretaceous-Early Palaeogene echinoderms and the K/T boundary in the southeast Netherlands and northeast Belgium – Part 1: Introduction and stratigraphy. Scripta Geologica 116: 1–57.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., 2003. The ichnofossil genera Radulichnus and Renichnus in the Maastrichtian of The Netherlands and Belgium. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 73: 175–184.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M. & Jagt-Yazykova, E.A., 2012. Stratigraphy of the type Maastrichtian – a synthesis. In: Jagt, J.W.M., Donovan, S.K. & Jagt-Yazykova, E.A. (eds): Fossils of the type Maastrichtian (Part 1). Scripta Geologica Special Issue 8: 5–32.Google Scholar
Janssen, R., Van Baal, R.R. & Schulp, A.S., 2011. On the taphonomy of the late Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) marine turtle Allopleuron hofmanni . In: Jagt, J.W.M., Jagt-Yazykova, E.A. & Schins, W.J.H. (eds): A tribute to the late Felder brothers – pioneers of Limburg geology and prehistoric archaeology. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 90: 187–196.Google Scholar
Mulder, E.W.A., 1998. Thoracosaurine vertebrae (Crocodylia: Crocodylidae) from the Maastrichtian type area. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie voor Wetenschappen 100: 161–170.Google Scholar
Mulder, E.W.A., 2003. On latest Cretaceous tetrapods from the Maastrichtian type area. Publicaties van het Natuurhistorisch Genootschap in Limburg 44: 1–188.Google Scholar
Mulder, E.W.A., Bardet, N., Godefroit, P. & Jagt, J.W.M., 2000. Elasmosaur remains from the Maastrichtian type area, and a review of the latest Cretaceous elasmosaurs (Reptilia, Plesiosauroidea). Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 70: 161–178.Google Scholar
Mulder, E.W.A., Jagt, J.W.M. & Schulp, A.S., 2005. Another record of a hadrosaurid dinosaur from the Maastrichtian type area (the Netherlands, Belgium): Seeley (1883) revisited. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 75: 201–206.Google Scholar
Pfaller, J.B., Bjorndal, K.A., Reich, K.J., Williams, K.L. & Frick, M.G., 2006. Distribution patterns of epibionts on the carapace of loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta . Journal of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Biodiversity Records (internet) 5381: 1–4. www.mba.ac.uk/jmba/jmba2biodiversityrecords.php.Google Scholar
Rothschild, B.M. & Martin, L.D., 2005. Mosasaur ascending: the phylogeny of bends. In: Schulp, A.S. & Jagt, J.W.M. (eds): Proceedings of the First Mosasaur Meeting. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 84: 341–344.Google Scholar
Rothschild, B.M., Martin, L.D. & Schulp, A.S., 2005. Sharks eating mosasaurs, dead or alive?. In: Schulp, A.S. & Jagt, J.W.M. (eds): Proceedings of the First Mosasaur Meeting. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 84: 335–340.Google Scholar
Rothschild, B.M., Schultze, H.-P. & Pellegrini, R., 2013. Osseous and other hard tissue pathologies in turtles and abnormalities of mineral deposition. In: Brinkman, D.B., Holroyd, P.A. & Gardner, J.D. (eds): Morphology and evolution of turtles. Springer (Dordrecht): 501–534.Google Scholar
Schiøler, P., Brinkhuis, H., Roncaglia, L. & Wilson, G.J., 1997. Dinoflagellate biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy of the Type Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous), ENCI Quarry, the Netherlands. Marine Micropaleontology 31: 65–95.Google Scholar
Schulp, A.S., 2006. On Maastricht mosasaurs. Publicaties van het Natuurhistorisch Genootschap in Limburg 45: 1–140.Google Scholar
Schulp, A.S., Walenkamp, G.H.I.M., Hofman, P.A.M., Rothschild, B.M. & Jagt, J.W.M., 2004. Rib fracture in Prognathodon saturator (Mosasauridae, Late Cretaceous). Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 83: 251–254.Google Scholar
Schwimmer, D.R., Stewart, J.D. & Williams, G.D., 1997. Scavenging by sharks of the genus Squalicorax in the Late Cretaceous of North America. Palaios 12: 71–83.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.C., Johnson, L.E. & Hawkins, S.J., 1997. A method for spatial and temporal assessment of gastropod grazing intensity in the field: the use of radula scrapes on wax surfaces. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 218: 63–76.Google Scholar
Van, der Ham R.W.J.M., Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J.H.A. & Indeherberge, L., 2007. Seagrass foliage from the Maastrichtian type area (Maastrichtian, Danian, NE Belgium, SE Netherlands). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 144: 301–321.Google Scholar
Voigt, E., 1977. On grazing traces produced by the radula of fossil and Recent gastropods and chitons. In: Crimes, T.P. & Harper, J.C. (eds): Trace fossils 2. Seel House Press (Liverpool): 335–346.Google Scholar
Voigt, E. & Domke, W., 1955. Thalassocharis bosqueti Debey ex Miquel, ein strukturell erhaltenes Seegras aus der holländischen Kreide. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologischen Staatsinstitut in Hamburg 24: 87–102.Google Scholar