Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:37:01.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Private International Law – Custody

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Netherlands Judicial Decisions
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , August 1974 , pp. 195 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* J.E.J.Th. Deelen, editor.

* but see Pres. District Court Rotterdam March 29, 1972, AK 7808 (summary proceedings) simply stating that an Austrian custody order, made after an Austrian divorce, “could not be enforced in the Netherlands, where the child presently is”, adding that is was not in the interest of the child to change the situation pending an application by the mother to the Dutch Kantonrechter. Cf. the recognition of a guardianship decree, made by a Greek court, because of “exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of the children's residence”, (in a different situation however) (Court of Appeal of Amsterdam NJ 1967, 302).