Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:44:40.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Netherlands Judicial Decisions Regarding the Application of the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

P. Vlas
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , December 1996 , pp. 397 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

**

Professor of Private International and Comparative Law, Free University, Amsterdam; Editor-in-Chief.

References

1. See on the subject of uniform interpretation of the Lugano Convention: DuintjerTebbens, H., ‘The European Jurisdiction and Enforcement Conventions: Interpretation, Concurrence and Prospects’, 40 NILR (1993) p. 474 et seqCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. Apart from the Netherlands, France and Switzerland, the Lugano Convention is now in force between the following Contracting States: Luxembourg (as from 1 February 1992), the United Kingdom (as from 1 May 1992), Portugal (as from 1 July 1992), Italy (as from 1 December 1992), Sweden (as from 1 January 1993), Norway (as from 1 May 1993), Finland (as from 1 July 1993), Ireland (as from 1 December 1993), Spain (as from 1 November 1994), Germany (as from 1 March 1995), Iceland (as from 1 December 1995), Denmark (as from 1 March 1996) and Austria (as from 1 September 1996).

3. See also Duintjer Tebbens, loc. cit. n. 1, p. 478 and Pellis, L., ‘All Roads Lead to Brussels: Towards a Uniform European Civil Procedure’, 37 NILR (1990) p. 387Google Scholar.

4. See Jayme, E. and Chr. Kohler, , ‘Europäisches Kollisionsrecht 1996 — Anpassung und Transformation der nationalen Rechte’, 16 IPRax (1996) p. 382Google Scholar.