Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:23:04.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gut Dam Arbitration*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Documents
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1969 , pp. 161 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This exclusively informative paper only reflects the personal view of the present author. It does not in any respect engage the Governments of the United States and Canada. For obvious reasons evaluation of the case has strictly been omitted.

2 30 Stat. 1151 (1899).

3 Infra p. 185.Google Scholar

4 Supra p. 173 and p. 177.

5 Oster, Clay et al. v. Dominion of Canada, 144Google Scholar F. Supp. 746 (N.D.N.Y.) (1956), aff d 238 F.2d 400 (1956), cert, denied 313 U.S. 936 (1957). A digest of the case in 50 Am. Journ. Int. Law (1956), p. 962.Google Scholar

6 For the text of the Agreement see Treaties and other International Acts Series (T.I.A.S.) 6114.

7 59 Am. Journ. Int. Law (1965), p. 892et sqq.Google Scholar

8 Senate Document 89th Congr. ist Sess. — Executive C No. 35–118

9 Reported in 19 External Affairs (1967), p. 98et sqq.Google Scholar