Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:38:21.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discharging a Bankruptcy in France and the Recovery of an Undischarged Claim against a Debtor in the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

Titia M. Bos
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , December 1996 , pp. 390 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Among other references, see: District Court of Leeuwarden, 22 October 1981, NIPR 1983 no. 202; Pres. District Court of The Hague, 20 October 1992, NIPR 1993, no. 177; District Court of Amsterdam, 19 May 1993, NIPR 1994, no. 128; Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 10 March 1994, NIPR 1994, no. 292.

2. See: District Court of Roermond, 6 March 1986, NIPR 1986 no. 484; District Court of Roermond, 5 June 1986, NIPR 1987 no. 166; Subdistrict Court of The Hague, 9 April 1992, NIPR 1992 no. 282; Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 13 January 1994, NIPR 1994 no. 290; District Court of Amsterdam, 30 March 1994, NIPR 1994 no. 267.

3. Convention on Insolvency Proceedings of the European Union, Brussels, 25 September 1995.

4. Bos, T.M., ‘Cross-Border Insolvency’, in ‘Netherlands Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of Private International Law’, 42 NILR (1995) pp. 121–130Google Scholar.

5. The Advocate General here refers to: Kosters, J. and Dubbink, C.W., Algemeen deel van hetNederlandseinternationaalprivaatrecht, 2nd edn. (1962)p. 868Google Scholar; Verheul, J.P., ‘Overzichtder Nederlandse Rechtspraak, Internationaal Privaatrecht; Faillissement (1979–1986)’, WPNR (1986) 5805, p. 704Google Scholar, referring to the President of the District Court of Rotterdam, 30 August 1982.

6. P. Colle and F. t'Kint, ‘Report for Belgium’, in Fletcher, I.F., Cross-Border Insolvency: National and Comparative Studies (1992) pp. 63–68Google Scholar;van Hecke, G., ‘Company Bankruptcy and Similar Proceedings in Belgian Private International Law’, in Voskuil, C. C. A. et al. , eds., Corporate Bankruptcy and Similar Proceedings. Hague-Zagreb-Ghent Essays (7) on the Law of International Trade (1989) pp. 86–87Google Scholar. The Convention Between Belgium and France Concerning Judicial Competence, and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judicial Decisions, Arbitration Decisions and Authentic Acts, entered into in Paris on 8 July 1899, does not apply. Although Art. 8 does recognise bankruptcies, it limits their scope to merchants of Belgian or French nationality; see: Weser, M., Traité Franco-Beige du 8 juillet 1899 (1950) p. 233 et seqGoogle Scholar.