Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:49:22.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-Border Insolvency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

Titia M. Bos
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Law, Faculty of Economics, University of Amsterdam
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Netherlands Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of Private International Law
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See also: R.I.V.F. Bertrams, ‘Set-off in Private International Law’, in Boele-Woelki, K. et al. , eds., Comparability and Evaluation. Essays on Comparative Law, Private International Law and International Commercial Arbitration (1994) p. 164.Google Scholar

2. P. Vlas, ‘Bilaterale Executieverdragen’, in Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering, loose-leaf pub., p. 5 et seq. See also: Hanisch, H., ‘Die Wende im deutschen internationalen Insolvenzrecht’, ZIP (1985) p. 1243.Google Scholar

3. J.H. Dalhuisen, ‘Report for the Netherlands’, in Fletcher, I.F., ed., Cross-Border Insolvency: National and Comparative Studies (1992) pp. 190191.Google Scholar

4. Drobnig, U., ‘Cross-border Insolvency: General Problems‘, 19 FORUM Int. (11 1993) p. 13Google Scholar (Special Issue Seminar on Cross-border Insolvency).

5. I.F. Fletcher, ‘General Report’, in Fletcher, I.F., ed., Cross-Border Insolvency: National and Comparative Studies (1992) p. 281.Google Scholar

6. Beukenhorst, D.H., ‘Het Internationale faillissementsrecht’, in Het faillissement in de tijd van Molengraaff en nu. Preadvies van de Vereeniging Handelsrecht (1993) p. 192.Google Scholar

7. In much the same way as the German Supreme Court clarified matters for German legal practice with a judgment rendered in 1985 (BGH 11 July 1985 IPRspr. 1985 No. 218).