Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:18:50.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BASRAH: an automatic system to identify the meter of Arabic poetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2012

MAYTHAM ALABBAS ,
ZAINAB A. KHALAF  and
KHASHAN M. KHASHAN
MAYTHAM ALABBAS
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, College of Science, Basrah University, Basrah, Iraq e-mail: [email protected]
ZAINAB A. KHALAF
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, College of Science, Basrah University, Basrah, Iraq e-mail: [email protected] School of Computer Science, University Science Malaysia (USM), 11800 Penang, Malaysia e-mail: [email protected]
KHASHAN M. KHASHAN
Affiliation:
P.O. BOX 42821, Riyadh 11551, Saudi Arabia e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arabic prosody is the science that studies the music of Arabic poetry, which is mainly meter and rhyme. The identification of meters for Arabic verses or poems is a complicated task. This task requires a certain level of expertise to identify the meter to which a verse belongs. In this paper, we present BASRAH1, a system that automatically identifies the meter of Arabic poetry by using the numerical prosody method. The numerical prosody method depends on verse coding, which is derived from the general concept of Al-Khalil's feet by using two primary units (cord = 2) and (peg = 3). On testing both old and modern Arabic verses and poems, BASRAH has proved to be an efficient tool to help inexperienced users to determine the meter of Arabic verses and poems.

Type
Articles
Information
Natural Language Engineering , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 131 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdullateef, M. 2007. (Al-byna' Al-ςrwDy llqSydħ Al-ςrbyħ). Cairo, Egypt: Dar Ghareeb llteba‘a wa al-Nasher.Google Scholar
Ahmad, S. 2006. (Al-kAfy fy ςlmy Al-ςruD wa Al-qwAfy), 1st ed. Cairo, Egypt: Mktabat al-Thaqafa al-Denya.Google Scholar
Al-‘Ali, F. 1998. (Al-mysr Al-kAfy fy Al-ςrwD wa Al-qwAfy). Amman, Jordan: Dar al-Thaqafah Llnasher wa al-Tawzee‘.Google Scholar
Al-‘edany, J. 2001. (Hwsbt ςlm Al-ςrwD Al-ςrby). Basrah, Iraq: University of Basrah.Google Scholar
Al-Hanafi, J. 1991. (Al-ςrwD thðybh wa ĂςAdt tdwynh). Baghdad, Iraq: Dar al-Sh'oon al-Thaqafya al-‘ama.Google Scholar
Al-Hussian, A. n.d. Program of Azkary Al-Hussian for Al-ςrwD Al-ςrby. http://azahou45.free.fr/arod1.php Accessed Sep 2010.Google Scholar
Al-Katib, M. 1971. (Al-šςr Al-ςrby bAstςmAl Al-ArqAm Al-θnA'yħ). Basrah, Iraq: Mtba‘t Mslahat al-Moany' al-Iraqia.Google Scholar
Al-Taweel, M. 2006. “” (fy ςrwD Al-šςr Al-ςrby “qDAyA wa mnAkšAt”). Cairo, Egypt: Dar Ghareeb Llteba‘a wa al-Nasher.Google Scholar
Etmeesh, M. 2006. (thwylAt Al-šjrħ, drAsħ fy mwsyqħ Al-šςr Al-jdyd). Baghdad, Iraq: Dar al-Sh'oon al-Thaqafya al-‘ama.Google Scholar
Habash, N. 2010. Introduction to Arabic natural language processing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies 3 (1): 1–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habash, N., Rambow, O., and Roth, R. 2009. Mada+ tokan: A toolkit for Arabic tokenization, diacritization, morphological disambiguation, pos tagging, stemming and lemmatization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Arabic Language Resources and Tools (MEDAR), pp. 242–254. Cairo, Eygpt.Google Scholar
Habash, N., Soudi, A., and Buckwalter, T. 2007. On Arabic transliteration. In Soudi, Abdelhadi, van den Bosch, Antal and Neumann, Günter (eds.), Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-Based and Empirical Methods, pp. 15–22. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkat, M. 2007. (Al-lsAnyAt Al-ryADyħ wa Al-ςrwD). Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Hadatha Llteba‘a wa al-Nasher.Google Scholar
Isa, F. 2010. (Al-ςrwD Al-ςrby wa mHAwlAt Al-tTwyr wa Al-tjdyd fyh), 1st ed.Alexandria, Egypt: Dar al-Ma'rifah al-Jami'iah.Google Scholar
Khalaf, Z., Shahed, M., and Ali, S. 2009. (Hwsbħ mwAzyn Al-šςr Al-ςrby). University of Sharjah Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 6 (1): 41–62.Google Scholar
Khalil, I. 2009. (ςrwD Al-šςr Al-ςrby), 1st ed.Amman, Jordan: Dar al-Masyrah lltyba'ah wa al-Nashr.Google Scholar
Khashan, K. 2003. 1 (Al-xlyl wa Al-ςrwD Al-rqmy 1). Journal of Arabic Linguistics Tradition (JALT) 1: 25–34.Google Scholar
Khashan, K. 2004. 2 (Al-xlyl wa Al-ςrwD Al-rqmy 2). Journal of Arabic Linguistics Tradition (JALT) 2: 1–12.Google Scholar
Khashan, K. 2005. 3 (Al-xlyl wa Al-ςrwD Al-rqmy 3). Journal of Arabic Linguistics Tradition (JALT) 3: 24–47.Google Scholar
Khashan, K. 2006. 4 (Al-xlyl wa Al-ςrwD Al-rqmy 4). Journal of Arabic Linguistics Tradition (JALT) 4: 46–67.Google Scholar
Kushek, A. 2004. (mHAwlAt Al-tjdyd fy ĂyqAς Al-šςr). Cairo, Egypt: Dar Ghareeb Llteba‘a wa al-Nasher.Google Scholar
Maling, J. 1973. The Theory of Classical Arabic Metrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Mukhtar, A. 1985. (dAŷrħ Al-wHdħ fy ÂwzAn Al-šςr Al-ςrby). Tunis, Tunisia: al-Monadhama al-Arabia Lltarbya wa al-Thaqafa wa al-‘llom.Google Scholar
Mustafa, M. 2005. (Âhdý sbyl Ălý ςlmy Al-xlyl, Al-ςrwD wa Al-qwAfy). Beirut, Lebanon: ‘alaam al-Kutoob Llteba‘a wa al-Nasher wa al-Tawzee’.Google Scholar
Mustajeer, A. 2005. (mdxl ryAdy Ălý ςrwD Al-šςr Al-ςrby). Cairo, Egypt: Dar al-'ayn Llnasher.Google Scholar
Shittu, S. 2006. Rules of metrics, alterations and addition in Arabic prosody. An Encyclopaedia of The Art 2 (1): 1–5.Google Scholar
Uthman, M. 2004. (Al-mršd Al-wAfy fy Al-ςrwD wa Al-qwafy). Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutoob al-‘lmya.Google Scholar
Wajeeh, M. 2007. (Al-ςrwD wa Al-qAfyħ byn Al-trAθ wa Al-tjdyd). Cairo, Egypt: Mo‘ssat al-Mukhtar Llnasher wa al-Tawzee‘.Google Scholar