Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T04:41:14.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Worlds Apart: The Swabian Expulsion from Hungary after World War II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Thomas Spira
Thomas Spira*
Affiliation:
University of Prince Edward Island and editor of Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The German expulsion is a sad chapter of post-World War II Hungrian history. After 1945, hundreds of thousands of Hungary's German-speaking citizens (popularly known as Swabians) were expelled as traitors. They were accused of having joined the Nazi-oriented Volksbund, or of having “volunteered” in the Third Reich's SS forces. The legality, morality, and rationality of the Hungarian government's action will be disputed for many years to come. More useful, however, might be an exploration of this apparently arbitrary and cruel expulsion of German-speaking Hungarian citizens. This essay surveys the troubled relationship that bound the Swabians and Hungarians together in ceaseless controversy from 1918 until the end of World War II. Their misunderstandings were basic and defied solution through dialogue, mutual concessions, or compromise.

Prior to World War I, Hungary's German citizens considered themselves relatively secure in their adopted Magyar-dominated homeland. As Hungarian citizens, they owed allegiance to Franz Josef I in his dual capacity as king of Hungary and as emperor of the supra-national Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. Despite some assimilationist efforts by the Magyars after the Ausgleich of 1868, the Swabians felt protected by the presence of a German king-emperor, and by the fact that the empire was largely Germandominated.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Fall 1985 , pp. 188 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Association for the Study of the Nationalities of the USSR and Eastern Europe, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a general history of the expulsion, see de Zayas, Alfred M., Nemesis at Potsdam: The Anglo-Americans and the Expulsion of the Germans: Background, Execution, Consequences (London and Boston, 1977).Google Scholar

2 For a general history of the period before World War I, see Senz, Ingomar, Die nationale Bewegung der ungarländischen Deutschen vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg (Munich, 1977).Google Scholar

3 Bleyer, Jakob, “A hazai németség,” Budapesti Szemle, March 1917, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

4 Bleyer, Jakob, “Bericht über die Lage der deutschen Minderheit in Ungarn,” in Deutsch-Ungarische Probleme, ed. Gustáv Gratz (Budapest, 1938), p. 245.Google Scholar

5 See, for example, Paikert, G.C., “Hungary's National Minority Policies, 1920–1945,” The American Slavic and East European Review, 12 (April 1953): 101–104. Paikert, a former Hungarian Ministry of Education official, pointed out, however, that non-Magyar parents frequently insisted on Magyar schools so that their children might become proficient in the official language. C.A. Macartney, Hungary and her Successors, 1919–1937 (Oxford, 1937), pp. 451-452, corroborated this view.Google Scholar

6 Spira, Thomas, German-Hungarian Relations and the Swabian Problem (New York, 1977), pp. 27–36.Google Scholar

7 Right after the war, Bleyer demanded equal cultural and linguistic rights for Hungary's Swabians. See Bleyer's statement in his newspaper, the Neue Post, 10 November 1918. These demands were reiterated throughout the interwar period by various Swabian leaders.Google Scholar

8 Years before the perceived Nazi menace, the Hungarian government worried about growing interest in Germany in compatriots residing beyond the homeland. See, for example, Gustav Stresemann's views on this question in “Fragen der deutschen Aussenpolitik: Dr. Stresemann über das Auslands-Deutschtum,” Deutsches Volksblatt (Stuttgart), 27 May 1927. During the Nazi era, Magyar fears intensified. For the Gömbös government's reaction ot the illegal subsidizing of völkisch Swabians by Reich government agencies, see especially “Vor der neuen Schulverordnung: Exzellenz Gustav Gratz über seine Aussprache mit dem Ministerpräsidenten,” Sonntagsblatt, 25 August 1935.Google Scholar

9 See various articles published in the Neue Post around this time, expecially “Christen zur Rettung der Kinderseelen,” 7 March 1919.Google Scholar

10 For the Kun regime's views on the nationality problem, see Béla Kun, Válogatott írások és beszédek, ed. Henrik Vass, István Frissné, and Eva Szabó, 2 vols. (Budapest, 1966), 1:107, and “A nyugat-magyarországi németek a sæovjetállamban,” Soproni Vöros Újság, 30 April 1919.Google Scholar

11 Budapesti Közlöny, 15 August 1919.Google Scholar

12 See the text in Budapesti Közlöny, 19 and 23 November 1919. The delay in publication was due to censorship by Romanian occupation forces.Google Scholar

13 For Bleyer's bitter recriminations with his colleagues because they had failed to implement the nationality statute, see OL ME 1919 XXII 5440 and OL ME 1920 XLII/a 8634, reporting cabinet session of 2 October 1919. Also see Béla, Beliér, “Az ellenforradalmi rendszer elsö éveinek nemzetiségi politikája,” Századok, (1963): 1290.Google Scholar

14 The Swabians blamed “liberal politicans” for the fiasco of the nationality law. See “Die Verdienste des Ministeriums der nationalen Minderheiten,” Neue Post, 23 October 1920. Swabian elementary schools felt the neglect keenly. For example, German elementary schools with 7,506 pupils in 1921–1922 dwindled to 9 schools with 239 pupils in 1923–1924. See Belügyminisztérium, M.K., Magyar statisztikai évkönyv és jelentés (Budapest, 1923–1925), pp. 230–232.Google Scholar

15 Budapesti Közlöny, 22 June 1923.Google Scholar

16 These complaints were constantly publicized in Hungary's German press, especially Bleyer's Sonntagsblatt, which replaced the Neue Post in 1921. See, for example, Jakob Bleyer, “Über die Schulverordnung,” Sonntagsblatt, 23 September 1923, and Gustav Gratz, “Bethlen külpolitikája és kisebbségi politikája,” Magyar Szemle, 22 (1934): 133-135. In his article, Gratz maintained that the government had honest intentions, but that chauvinistic local officials obstructed the school law.Google Scholar

17 “Deutsche Vereinwesen in Ungarn,” Sonntagsblatt, 15 July 1923; Jakob Bleyer, “Quertreibereien,” Sonntagsblatt, 29 March 1925.Google Scholar

18 Publications in Germany devoted to the affairs of Germans living abroad dismissed the UDV as a government organization. See, for example, the editor's comments in “Ungarn,” Der Auslandsdeutsche, 14 (1931): 639.Google Scholar

19 For details of this episode, see Spira, German-Hungarian Relations, pp. 207–208.Google Scholar

20 Budapesti Hírlap, a semi-official daily, regularly abused the Swabians. Magyarország and Esti Hírlap lumped Swabians and Nazis into the same category. See also A. König, “Die Krise unserer Nationalitätenpolitik,” Sonntagsblatt, 5 February 1933, for the Swabian response to these attacks.Google Scholar

21 It was formally introduced in the parliament on 20 May 1936. See Napló 8 (1936): 63ff.Google Scholar

22 G[eorg] G[oldschmidt], “Die Schulfrage und die jetztige Leitung des UDV,” Deutscher Volksbote, 4, no. 1 (February 1938): 3; Georg Goldschmidt, “Gewissenlose Irreführung,” Deutscher Volksbote, 4, no. 3 (May 1938): 5; and Heinrich Mühl, “Noche immer die Schulfrage,” Deutscher Volksbote, 4, nos. 6-7 (October 1938): 4.Google Scholar

23 “Das Wesen unseres Volkstumskampfes,” Deutsche Volksbote, 4, no. 2 (April 1938): 6; “Sind Assimilierungsbestrebungen vorhanden?” Deutsche Volksbote, 4, no. 2 (April 1938): 6-7.Google Scholar

24 Beer, Georg, “Der Sinn unseres Volkstumskampfes,” Deutsche Volksbote, 4, no. 4 (July 1938): 4.Google Scholar

25 Count Albert Apponyi summed up the Magyar viewpoint during his presentation before the representatives of the peace conference. See Deák, Francis, Hungary at the Paris Peace Conference (New York, 1972), pp. 539–549.Google Scholar

26 Faulstich, Ágidius, “Volksgruppe und Mutterland,” Deutscher Volksbote, 4, no. 1 (February 1938): 1.Google Scholar

27 Basch, Franz, “Deutscher Aufbruch in Ungrarn,” Nation und Staat, 12 (1938–1939): 210–211.Google Scholar

28 See Tilkovszky, L., Ez volt a Volksbund (Budapest, 1978), and Hillinger, Michael, “German National Movement in Interwar Hungary” (, Columbia University, 1973).Google Scholar

29 These demands are thoroughly discussed in Tilkovszky, Ez volt a Volskbund, pp. 161ff.Google Scholar

30 See Jagow's report of 20 February 1942, in György Ránki et al., eds., A Wilhelmstrasse és Magyarország: Nehmet diplomáciai iratok Magyarországról, 1933–1944 (Budapest, 1968), doc. 479.Google Scholar

31 OL ME NO 222. cs. 2/1941-42.Google Scholar

32 OL FT 10 944 d.E. 518-537-4, of 14 April 1944; and Auswärtiges Amt, PA, Büro des Staatssekretärs, Ungarn, Bd. 12. Veesenmayer's telegram of 1 June 1944.Google Scholar

33 Cited in Tilkovszky, Ez volt a Volksbund, p. 323.Google Scholar

34 OL FT 14362 d.E. 518515-18.Google Scholar