Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:30:42.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whose land is it? Land reform, minorities, and the titular “nation” in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Brent Hierman  and
Navruz Nekbakhtshoev
Brent Hierman*
Affiliation:
aInternational Studies & Political Science, Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, VA, USA
Navruz Nekbakhtshoev
Affiliation:
bPolitical Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Each of the post-Soviet Central Asian states inherited both inefficient collectivized agricultural systems and an understanding of the nation rooted in categories defined by Soviet nationality policy. Despite the importance placed on territorial homelands in many contemporary understandings of nationalism, the divergent formal responses to these dual Soviet legacies have generally been studied in isolation from one another. However, there are conceptual reasons to expect more overlap in these responses than generally assumed; in this paper, we engage in a focused comparison of three post-Soviet Central Asian states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan) in order to investigate how nationalizing policies and discourse, land distribution, and ethnic tensions interact with each other over time. We reveal that the nationalizing discourses of the three states – despite promoting the titular groups vis-à-vis other groups – have had limited influence on the actual processes of land distribution. Furthermore, the Kyrgyzstani case challenges the assumption that the effect flows unidirectionally from nationalizing policies and discourse to land reform implementation; in this case, there is evidence that the disruption caused by farm reorganization generated grievances which were then articulated by some nationalistic political elites.

Keywords

land reformnation-buildingCentral Asia
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 336 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albertus, Michael. 2012. “Vote Buying With Multiple Distributive Goods.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (9): 1082–1111.Google Scholar
Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2004. “Sub Rosa Resistance and the Politics of Economic Reform: Land Redistribution in Post-Soviet Ukraine.” World Politics 56 (4): 554–581.Google Scholar
Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2008. The Post-Soviet Potemkin Village: Politics and Property Rights in the Black Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Babak, Vladimir, Vaisman, Demian, and Wasserman, Aryeh. 2004. Political Organization in Central Asia and Azerbijan: Sources and Documents. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Baland, Jean-Marie, and Robinson, James A. 2012. “The Political Value of Land: Political Reform and Land Prices in Chile.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 601–619.Google Scholar
Bloch, Peter C. 2002. “Kyrgyzstan: Almost Done, What Next?” Problems of Post Communism 49 (1): 53–62.Google Scholar
Bohr, Annette. 1998. “The Central Asian States as Nationalizing Regimes.” In Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Borderlands: The Politics of National Identities, edited by Law Graham Smith, Vivien, Wilson, Andrew, Bohr, Annette and Allworth, Edward, 139–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonnenfant, Isik Kuscu. 2012. “Constructing the Homeland: Kazakhstan's Discourse and Policies Surrounding its Ethnic Return-migration Policy.” Central Asian Survey 31 (1): 31–44. doi:10.1080/02634937.2012.650004.Google Scholar
Boone, Catherine. 2007. “Property and Constitutional Order: Land Tenure Reform and the Future of the African State.” African Affairs 106 (425): 557–586.Google Scholar
Boone, Catherine. 2009. “Electoral Populism Where Property Rights Are Weak: Land Politics in Contemporary Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Politics 41 (2): 183–201.Google Scholar
Boone, Catherine. 2011. “Politically Allocated Land Rights and the Geography of Electoral Violence: The Case of Kenya in the 1990s.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (10): 1311–1342.Google Scholar
Boone, Catherine, and Kriger, Norma. 2010. “Multiparty Elections and Land Patronage: Zimbabwe and Cote d'Ivoire.” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 48 (2): 173–202.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2011. “Nationalizing States Revisited: Projects and Processes of Nationalization in Post-Soviet States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (11): 1785–1814. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2011.579137.Google Scholar
Chakravorty, Sanjoy. 2013. The Price of Land: Acquisition, Conflict, Consequence. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Kathleen. 2006. Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Commercio, Michele E. 2010. Russian Minority Politics in Post-Soviet Latvia and Kyrgyzstan: The Transformative Power of Informal Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Dercon, Stefan, and Gutierrez-Romero, Roxana. 2012. “Triggers and Characteristics of the 2007 Kenyan Electoral Violence.” World Development 40 (4): 731–744.Google Scholar
Driscoll, Jesse. 2009. “Exiting Anarchy: Militia Politics after the Post-Soviet Wars.” PhD diss., Stanford University.Google Scholar
Dudwick, Nora, Fock, Karin, and Sedik, David J. 2007. Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Transition Countries: The Experience of Bulgaria, Moldova, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Gaisina, Sholpan. 2011. “Credit Policies for Kazakhstani Agriculture.” Central Asian Survey 30 (2): 257–274. doi:10.1080/02634937.2011.565228.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, Gregory. 1992. Land Reform in the New States of Central Asia. Washington, DC: National Council for Soviet and East European Research.Google Scholar
Green, Elliott D. 2006. “Ethnicity and the Politics of Land Tenure Reform in Central Uganda.” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 44 (3): 370–388.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. 2009. “Cause Without a Rebel: Kazakhstan's Unionist Nationalism in the USSR and CIS.” Nationalities Papers 37 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Hierman, Brent. 2010. “What Use Was the Election to Us? Clientelism and Political Trust Amongst Ethnic Uzbeks in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.” Nationalities Papers 38 (2): 245–263.Google Scholar
Huskey, Eugene. 1997. “Kyrgyzstan: The Fate of Political Liberalization.” In Conflict, Cleavage, and Change in Central Asia and the Caucasus, edited by Dawisha, Karen and Parrott, Bruce, 242–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Kevin D. 2004. “Land Privatization and Conflict in Central Asia: Is Kyrgyzstan a Model?” In In the Tracks of Tamerlane: Central Asia's Path to the 21st Century, edited by Burghart, Daniel L. and Sabonis-Helf, Theresa, 259–273. Washington, DC: National Defense University, Center for Technology and National Security Policy.Google Scholar
Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joshi, Madhav, and David Mason, T. 2008. “Between Democracy and Revolution: Peasant Support for Insurgency versus Democracy in Nepal.” Journal of Peace Research 45 (6): 765–782.Google Scholar
Joshi, Madhav, and David Mason, T. 2011. “Peasants, Patrons, and Parties: The Tension Between Clientelism and Democracy in Nepall.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (1): 151–175.Google Scholar
Kramon, Eric, and Posner, Daniel N. 2013. “Who Benefits from Distributive Politics? How the Outcome One Studies Affects the Answer One Gets.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (2): 461–474.Google Scholar
Laruelle, Marlene. 2007. “The Return of the Aryan Myth: Tajikistan in Search of a Secularized National Ideology.” Nationalities Papers 35 (1): 51–70. doi:10.1080/00905990601124462.Google Scholar
Laruelle, Marlene. 2012. “The Paradigm of Nationalism in Kyrgyzstan. Evolving Narrative, The Sovereignty Issue, and Political Agenda.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45 (1-2): 39–49.Google Scholar
Lerman, Zvi, and Sedik, David. 2009. Agrarian Reform in Kyrgyzstan: Achievements and the Unfinished Agenda. Policy Studies on Rural Transition No. 2009-1. Budapest: FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marat, Erica. 2008. “Imagined Past, Uncertain Future: The Creation of National Ideologies in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.” Problems of Post-Communism 55 (1): 12–24.Google Scholar
McGlinchey, Eric M. 2011. Chaos, Violence, Dynasty: Politics and Islam in Central Asia. Pittsburgh, PA.: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Megoran, Nick. 2012. Averting Violence in Kyrgyzstan: Understanding and Responding to Nationalism. Russia and Eurasia Programme Paper. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Mudahar, Mohinder S. 1998. Kyrgyz Republic: Strategy for Rural Growth and Poverty Alleviation. World Bank Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank, Rural Development and Environment Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region.Google Scholar
Nakaya, Sumie. 2009. “Aid and Transition from a War Economy to an Oligarchy in Post-War Tajikistan.” Central Asian Survey 28 (3): 259–273. doi:10.1080/02634930903421764.Google Scholar
Olcott, Martha Brill. 1997. “Democratization and the Growth of Political Participation in Kazakhstan.” In Conflict, Cleavage, and Change in Central Asia and the Caucasus, edited by Dawisha, Karen and Parrott, Bruce, 201–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radnitz, Scott. 2010. Weapons of the Wealthy: Predatory Regimes and Elite-led Protests in Central Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ronsijn, Wouter. 2006. Coping During Transition in Rural Areas: The Case of Post-Soviet Southern Kyrgyzstan. Conflict Research Group Working Paper (4). Ghent, BE: Conflict Research Group, Ghent University.Google Scholar
Roy, Olivier. 2000. The New Central Asia: The Creation of Nations. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sanghera, Balihar, and Satybaldieva, Elmira. 2012. “Ethics of Property, Illegal Settlements and the Right to Subsistence.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 32 (1/2): 96–114.Google Scholar
Sarsembayev, Azamat. 1999. “Imagined Communities: Kazak nationalism and Kazakification in the 1990s.” Central Asian Survey 18 (3): 319–346. doi:10.1080/02634939995605.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward A. D. 2000. “Framing Strategies and Non-conflict in Multi-Ethnic Kazakhstan.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 6 (2): 71–94. doi:10.1080/13537110008428596.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 2009. Ethno-Symbolism and Nationalism: A Cultural Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spector, Regine A. 2004. “The Transformation of Askar Akaev, President of Kyrgyzstan”. Working Paper Series: Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies.Google Scholar
Swinnen, Johan F. M. 1997. “The Choice of Privatization and Decollectivization Policies in Central and Eastern European Agriculture: Observations and Political Economy Hypotheses.” In Political Economy of Agrarian Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Swinnen, Johan F. M., 363–398. Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Swinnen, Johan F. M. 1999. “The Political Economy of Land Reform Choices in Central and Eastern Europe.” The Economics of Transition 7 (3): 637–664.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). 2010. Country Profiles on the Housing Section – Kyrgyzstan. New York: UNECE Information Service.Google Scholar
USAID (United States Agency for International Development). 2005a. Assessment of the Implementation of the Interim Provisions, Land Code in Kazakhstan: Final Report. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
USAID (United States Agency for International Development). 2005b. Land Tenure and Property Rights Assessment for Kyrgyzstan. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
USAID (United States Agency for International Development). 2011. USAID Country Profile: Kyrgyzstan- Property Rights and Resource Governance. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
Verdery, Katherine. 2003. The Vanishing Hectare : Property and Value in Postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2012. Farmer and Farm Worker Perceptions of Land Reform and Sustainable Agriculture in Tajikistan. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zakon KR o gosudarstvennykh garantiiakh etnicheskim kyrgyzam, vozvrashchaiushchimsia na istoricheskuiu rodinu [The Law of the KR on State Guarantees for Ethnic Kyrgyz Returning to their Historical Homeland]. Passed in the Jogorku Kenesh on October 10, 2007; Amended July 18, 2008 (No 157).Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2008. “Does Landholding Inequality Block Democratization? A Test of the ‘Bread and Democracy’ Thesis and the Case of Prussia.” World Politics 60 (4): 610–641.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2009. “Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case of Nineteenth-Century Germany.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar