Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Traditionally in Eastern Europe, one national group constituted a majority in the countryside but a minority in the urban areas. Thus, while the cities of Eastern Europe possessed a disproportionate share of an area's political and socio-economic resources, for the most part they were ethnically alien to the peasantry. This was not a problem until the nineteenth century, which by 1914 turned Eastern Europe into a cauldron of inter-ethnic and anti-Semitic tensions. In the subsequent struggle for power, the national movements of both the urban and rural areas claimed the cities as well as the surrounding countryside. Inasmuch as these movements did not possess a common set of interests, whatever the proposed solution — whether territorial autonomy, irredentism, independence, expansion, or the maintenance of the status quo — hardly any provision was made for minority rights.
1. See Bauer, Otto, Die Nationalitätenfrage und die Sozialdemokratie (Vienna, 1907), and Renner, Karl, Das Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Nationen (Leipzig-Vienna, 1918).Google Scholar
2. See Pipes, Richard, The Formation of the Soviet Union, rev. ed. (New York,- 1968), pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
3. See Boshyk, George Y., “The Rise of Ukrainian Political Parties in Russia, 1900-1907: With Special Reference to Social Democracy,” unpublished , University of Oxford, 1981.Google Scholar
4. Ukraina: Statystychnyi shchorichnyk 1929 (Kharkiv, 1929), Table 4, p. 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Quoted in Visnyk Soiuza vyzvolennia Ukrainy, 4, no. 22. (May 27, 1917): 351; and in Henryk Jablonski, Polska Autonomia Narodowa na Ukraine, 1917-1918 (Warsaw, 1948), p. 30.Google Scholar
6. The delegates to the Congress had the opportunity to hear talks on such topics as “The State and the Federalistic Aspirations in the Ukraine,” “Federalism and the Requirements of the Democratic Russian Republic,” “The Rights of the Minorities and Their Guarantees,” “The Autonomy of the Ukraine in a Federal Republic,” “About the Means of Creating an Autonomous Government in the Ukraine,” and “About the Guaranteeing of the Rights of the National Minorities.” Doroshenko, Dmytro, Istoriia Ukrainy, 1917-1923 (Uzhhorod, 1932; reprint: New York, 1954), 1: 58.Google Scholar
7. Khrystiuk, Pavlo, Zamitky i materialy do istorii ukrains'koi revoliutsii, 1917-1920 (Vienna, 1921), 1: 134n.Google Scholar
8. Manilov, V., ed., 7977 god na Kievshchine (Kiev, 1928), p. 72.Google Scholar
9. Quoted in Reshetar, John S. Jr., The Ukrainian Revolution, 1917-1920 (Princeton, N.J., 1952).Google Scholar
10. For the text of the First Universal, see Khrystiuk, , Zamitky, 1: 72–74; Doroshenko, Istoriia, 1: 89-92; Volodymyr Vynnychenko, Vidrodzhennia natsii (Vienna, 1920), 1: 219-24; and Iakiv Zozulia, Velyka Ukrains'ka revoliutsiia (New York, 1967), pp. 65-68.Google Scholar
11. Rafes, M., Dva goda revoliutsii na Ukraine (Moscow, 1920), p. 38.Google Scholar
12. For the text of the Second Universal, see Khrystiuk, , Zamitky, 1: 92–93; Vynnychenko, Vidrodzhennia, 1: 279-82; Doroshenko, Istoriia, 1: 115-16; Zozulia, Velyka, pp. 68-70; Visti z Ukrains'koi Tsentral'noi Rady, no. 10 (June 1917), p. 1.Google Scholar
13. For the text of the draft, see Khrystiuk, , Zamitky, 1: 96–97; Vynnychenko Vidrodzhennia, pp. 298-302; and Zozulia, Velyka, pp. 79-80.Google Scholar
14. For the text of the Provisional Government's instruction, see Doroshenko, , Istoriia, I pp. 128-29; Zozulia, Velyka, pp. 77-79; and Pipes, Formation, pp. 64-65.Google Scholar
15. Zozulia, , Velyka, p. 31.Google Scholar
16. For the text of the Third Universal, see Vynnychenko, , Vidrodzhennia, pp. 74–80; Doroshenko, , Istoriia, pp. 179-81; Zozulia, Velyka, pp. 70-73; Khrystiuk, Zamitky, 2: 51-53.Google Scholar
17. For the text of the Fourth Universal, see Zozulia, , Velyka, pp. 73–77; Doroshenko, Istoriia, pp. 264-68; Khrystiuk, Zamitky, 1: 103-06.Google Scholar
18. For the text of the law, see Zozulia, , Velyka, pp. 77–81.Google Scholar
19. See Goldelman, S., Jewish National Autonomy in the Ukraine, 1917-1920 (Chicago, 1963).Google Scholar
20. Ianivs'kyi, B., ed., Kostomarov's Books of the Genesis of the Ukrainian People (New York, 1954).Google Scholar
21. Dragomanov, M., “Vol'nyi soiuz,” in Sobraine politicheskikh’ sochinenii M. P. Dragomanova (Paris, 1905), 1: 273–375.Google Scholar
22. Rybalka, L. [Lev Iurkevych], Rosiis'ki sotsial-demokraty i natslonal'ne pytannia (Munich, 1969), p. 27.Google Scholar
23. For the text of the platform, see Chykalenko, Evhen, Spohady, 1861-1907 (L'viv, 1925), 3:9–10.Google Scholar
24. For the text of the platform, see Lotots'kyi, O., Storynky mynuloho (Warsaw, 1934), 3:33–34.Google Scholar
25. These articles were collected and published in Hrushevs'kyi, M., Vybrani pratsi (New York, 1960).Google Scholar
26. Hrushevs'kyi, M., “Narodnostiam Ukrainy,” in his Vil'na Ukraina (New York, 1918), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
27. Ibid., p. 19.Google Scholar
28. Ibid., p. 20.Google Scholar
29. Porsch, Mykola, Pro avtonomiiu Ukrainy (Kiev, 1907).Google Scholar
30. Ibid., p. 112.Google Scholar
31. Manilov, , 1917 god, pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
32. Zhitlovskii, C., Sotsializm i natsional'ne pytannie (Vienna, 1915); Juares, J., Bat'kivshchyna i robitnytstvo (Vienna, 1915); E. Pernerstorfer, Pro novitnii natsionalizm (Vienna, 1915); K. Renner, Gosudarstvo i natsiia: K natsional'nomu voprosu v Avstrii (Kiev, 1906); Natsiia iak pravna ideia i Internatsional (Vienna, 1915); Probliemy Skhodu (Natsional'ne pytannie na Skhodi) (Vienna, 1915); K. Renner and O. Hammer, Natsional'na sprava, internatsionalizm, imperializm i sotsializm (Vienna, 1915).Google Scholar
33. Manilov, , 1917 god, pp. 111-12.Google Scholar
34. Ibid., p. 404.Google Scholar
35. Hrushevs'kyi, M., Khto taki ukraintsi i choho vony khochut'? (Kiev, 1917), p. 14.Google Scholar
36. For the protocols of this Congress, see Svobodnyi soiuz, no. 1 (October 1917).Google Scholar
37. Khrystiuk, Zamitky, 2: 20.Google Scholar
38. Svobodnyi soiuz, pp. 9–10; Dimanshtein, S.M., ed., Revoliutsiia i natsional'nyi vopros (Moskow, 1930), 3: 444-45.Google Scholar
39. Hrushevs'kyi, M., “Iakoi my khochemo avtonomii i federatsii?”, in his Vybrani pratsi, p. 148.Google Scholar
40. Manilov, , 1917 god, p. 415.Google Scholar
41. Doroshenko, , Istoriia, 1: 143.Google Scholar
42. Ibid. Google Scholar
43. Manilov, , 1917 god, p. 415.Google Scholar
44. Cf. the results of the elections to the Constituent Assembly in Poltava province, where 97.6 percent of the population was Ukrainian in 1897, and where the Ukrainian parties had received approximately 83.3 percent of the November 1917 vote. See Radkey, Oliver H., The Election to the Russian Constituent Assembly of 1917 (Cambridge, Mass., 1950), p. 29n, 30. Of the 8,201,163 votes cast in the Ukrainian provinces, 5,557,560 or approximately 67.7 percent of the voters voted for Ukrainian parties or joint SR-Ukrainian lists. Calculated from Radkey, The Election, p. 79.Google Scholar
45. See Jablonski, , Polska Autonomia.Google Scholar
46. Vynnychenko, , Vidrodzhennia, 1: 296.Google Scholar
47. Claude, I. L. Jr., Swords into Ploughshares (New York, 1956), pp. 137-38; quoted in Rupert Emerson, From Empire to Nation (Boston, 1962), p. 331.Google Scholar
48. Vynnychenko, , Vidrodzhennia, 1: 255-56.Google Scholar
49. Ibid., p. 258.Google Scholar
50. Ibid., p. 256.Google Scholar
51. Hrushevs'kyi, M., “Chy Ukraina til'ky dlia ukraintsiv?”, in his Vil'na Ukraina, pp. 24–25.Google Scholar
52. Hrushevs'kyi, M., “Narodnotiam Ukrainy,” in ibid., p.21.Google Scholar
53. Vynnychenko, , Vidrodzhennia, 1: 295 Google Scholar
54. Doroshenko, , Istoriia 1: 127.Google Scholar
55. Tcherikower, Elias, Antisemitizm i progromy na Ukraine 1917-1918 gg. (Berlin, 1923), pp. 216-18.Google Scholar